DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Galaxy–Galaxy Weak-lensing Measurements from SDSS. I. Image Processing and Lensing Signals

Journal Article · · The Astrophysical Journal (Online)
ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [3];  [3];  [4]; ORCiD logo [5];  [6];  [4];  [7]; ORCiD logo [8]; ORCiD logo [9];  [9];  [10];  [11]
  1. Shanghai Astronomical Observatory (China); Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (China); Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA (United States)
  2. Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA (United States); Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (China)
  3. Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA (United States)
  4. Shanghai Normal Univ. (China)
  5. Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA (United States); Tsinghua Univ., Beijing (China)
  6. Yale Univ., New Haven, CT (United States)
  7. Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing (China). Key Lab. for Computational Astrophysics
  8. Univ. of Chicago, IL (United States); Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States); Univ. of Chicago, IL (United States). Kavli Inst. for Cosmological Physics (KICP)
  9. Peking Univ., Beijing (China)
  10. Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States). Dept. of Astronomy
  11. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF), Napoli (Italy); Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF), Padova (Italy)

We present our image processing pipeline that corrects the systematics introduced by the point-spread function (PSF). Using this pipeline, we processed Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) DR7 imaging data in r band and generated a galaxy catalog containing the shape information. Based on our shape measurements of the galaxy images from SDSS DR7, we extract the galaxy–galaxy (GG) lensing signals around foreground spectroscopic galaxies binned in different luminosities and stellar masses. We estimated the systematics, e.g., selection bias, PSF reconstruction bias, PSF dilution bias, shear responsivity bias, and noise rectification bias, which in total is between -9.1% and 20.8% at 2σ levels. The overall GG lensing signals we measured are in good agreement with Mandelbaum et al. The reduced $χ^2$ between the two measurements in different luminosity bins are from 0.43 to 0.83. Larger reduced $χ^2$ from 0.60 to 1.87 are seen for different stellar mass bins, which is mainly caused by the different stellar mass estimator. The results in this paper with higher signal-to-noise ratio are due to the larger survey area than SDSS DR4, confirming that more luminous/massive galaxies bear stronger GG lensing signals. We divide the foreground galaxies into red/blue and star-forming/quenched subsamples and measure their GG lensing signals. We find that, at a specific stellar mass/luminosity, the red/quenched galaxies have stronger GG lensing signals than their counterparts, especially at large radii. These GG lensing signals can be used to probe the galaxy–halo mass relations and their environmental dependences in the halo occupation or conditional luminosity function framework.

Research Organization:
Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) - Strategic Priority Research Program; National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC02-06CH11357
OSTI ID:
1494715
Journal Information:
The Astrophysical Journal (Online), Journal Name: The Astrophysical Journal (Online) Journal Issue: 1 Vol. 836; ISSN 1538-4357
Publisher:
Institute of Physics (IOP)Copyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (84)

Weak gravitational lensing journal January 2001
GalSim: The modular galaxy image simulation toolkit journal April 2015
Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints journal January 2005
Galaxy Formation and Evolution book January 2010
Understanding the results of galaxy-galaxy lensing using galaxy-mass correlation in numerical simulations journal February 2003
Stellar masses and star formation histories for 10 5 galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey journal May 2003
Shear calibration biases in weak-lensing surveys journal August 2003
Mapping the 3D dark matter potential with weak shear journal October 2003
The CFHTLS strong lensing legacy survey: I. Survey overview and T0002 release sample journal October 2006
Very weak lensing in the CFHTLS wide: cosmology from cosmic shear in the linear regime journal December 2007
SExtractor: Software for source extraction journal June 1996
A Method for Weak Lensing Observations journal August 1995
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric Camera journal December 1998
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary journal September 2000
Weak Lensing Measurements: A Revisited Method and Application to Hubble Space Telescope Images journal June 2000
A New Shear Estimator for Weak‐Lensing Observations journal July 2000
Shapes and Shears, Stars and Smears: Optimal Measurements for Weak Lensing journal February 2002
Strong Gravitational Lensing Time Delay Statistics and the Density Profile of Dark Halos journal April 2002
Estimating Fixed-Frame Galaxy Magnitudes in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey journal May 2003
The Optical and Near‐Infrared Properties of Galaxies. I. Luminosity and Stellar Mass Functions journal December 2003
The Galaxy-Mass Correlation Function Measured from Weak Lensing in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey journal May 2004
A Probable z  ∼ 7 Galaxy Strongly Lensed by the Rich Cluster A2218: Exploring the Dark Ages journal June 2004
Strong‐Lensing Analysis of A1689 from Deep Advanced Camera Images journal March 2005
New York University Value-Added Galaxy Catalog: A Galaxy Catalog Based on New Public Surveys journal June 2005
The Sloan Lens ACS Survey. II. Stellar Populations and Internal Structure of Early‐Type Lens Galaxies journal April 2006
Observational Evidence for an Age Dependence of Halo Bias journal January 2006
First Results on Shear‐selected Clusters from the Deep Lens Survey: Optical Imaging, Spectroscopy, and X‐Ray Follow‐up journal May 2006
COSMOS: Hubble Space Telescope Observations journal September 2007
The Cosmic Evolution Survey (COSMOS): Overview journal September 2007
Weak Gravitational Lensing with COSMOS: Galaxy Selection and Shape Measurements
  • Leauthaud, Alexie; Massey, Richard; Kneib, Jean‐Paul
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 172, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1086/516598
journal September 2007
The COSMOS Survey: Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys Observations and Data Processing journal September 2007
Galaxy Groups in the SDSS DR4. I. The Catalog and Basic Properties journal December 2007
Galaxy Groups in the SDSS DR4. II. Halo Occupation Statistics journal March 2008
The Sloan Lens ACS Survey. V. The Full ACS Strong‐Lens Sample journal August 2008
Comprehensive Two-Point Analyses of weak Gravitational Lensing Surveys journal April 2009
Subaru weak Lensing Measurements of four Strong Lensing Clusters: are Lensing Clusters Overconcentrated? journal June 2009
Cross-Correlation weak Lensing of sdss Galaxy Clusters. i. Measurements journal September 2009
Evolution of the Galaxy–Dark Matter Connection and the Assembly of Galaxies in dark Matter Halos journal May 2012
Galaxies in X-Ray Groups. ii. a weak Lensing Study of halo Centering journal August 2012
CLASH: THREE STRONGLY LENSED IMAGES OF A CANDIDATE z ≈ 11 GALAXY journal December 2012
Constraining the star Formation Histories in dark Matter Halos. i. Central Galaxies journal June 2013
The Seventh data Release of the Sloan Digital sky Survey journal May 2009
The Third Gravitational Lensing Accuracy Testing (Great3) Challenge Handbook journal April 2014
Measuring the reduced shear journal November 2011
Accurate shear measurement with faint sources journal January 2015
Connections Between Galaxy Mergers and Starburst: Evidence from the Local Universe journal June 2014
Spectroscopy of QSO candidates from the Jodrell Bank 966 MHz survey journal December 1979
Bayesian galaxy shape measurement for weak lensing surveys – III. Application to the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey journal January 2013
CFHTLenS: combined probe cosmological model comparison using 2D weak gravitational lensing journal February 2013
Constraining the substructure of dark matter haloes with galaxy–galaxy lensing journal March 2013
Bayesian lensing shear measurement journal January 2014
First galaxy–galaxy lensing measurement of satellite halo mass in the CFHT Stripe-82 Survey journal January 2014
Measuring the X-ray luminosities of SDSS DR7 clusters from ROSAT All Sky Survey journal January 2014
Cosmological parameter constraints from galaxy–galaxy lensing and galaxy clustering with the SDSS DR7 journal April 2013
Gravitational lensing analysis of the Kilo-Degree Survey journal October 2015
GREAT3 results – I. Systematic errors in shear estimation and the impact of real galaxy morphology journal May 2015
Cosmological constraints from weak lensing peak statistics with Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Stripe 82 Survey journal May 2015
Measuring subhalo mass in redMaPPer clusters with CFHT Stripe 82 Survey journal March 2016
The quest for an accurate measurement of cosmic shear journal April 2016
A scheme to deal accurately and efficiently with complex angular masks in galaxy surveys journal March 2004
Galaxy-galaxy weak lensing in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: intrinsic alignments and shear calibration errors journal September 2004
Cosmological weak lensing with the HST GEMS survey journal July 2005
Systematic errors in weak lensing: application to SDSS galaxy-galaxy weak lensing journal August 2005
Galaxy halo masses and satellite fractions from galaxy-galaxy lensing in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: stellar mass, luminosity, morphology and environment dependencies journal May 2006
The Shear Testing Programme – I. Weak lensing analysis of simulated ground-based observations journal April 2006
Weak lensing by galaxies in groups and clusters – I. Theoretical expectations journal November 2006
The Shear Testing Programme 2: Factors affecting high-precision weak-lensing analyses journal March 2007
Bayesian galaxy shape measurement for weak lensing surveys - I. Methodology and a fast-fitting algorithm journal November 2007
Precision photometric redshift calibration for galaxy–galaxy weak lensing journal May 2008
Bayesian galaxy shape measurement for weak lensing surveys - II. Application to simulations journal October 2008
Halo masses for optically selected and for radio-loud AGN from clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing journal February 2009
Galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing: a promising union to constrain cosmological parameters journal April 2009
Modelling galaxy-galaxy weak lensing with Sloan Digital Sky Survey groups journal April 2009
Galaxy density profiles and shapes - II. Selection biases in strong lensing surveys journal September 2009
Pixel-based correction for Charge Transfer Inefficiency in the Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys journal January 2010
Simple treatments of the photon noise and the pixelation effect in weak lensing: Simple treatments of noise and pixelation journal January 2010
Direct measurement of dark matter halo ellipticity from two-dimensional lensing shear maps of 25 massive clusters★: Measurement of dark matter halo ellipticity journal April 2010
Precision simulation of ground-based lensing data using observations from space: Ground-based image simulation journal December 2011
CFHTLenS: the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey: CFHTLenS journal October 2012
Subaru Telescope conference August 1998
Probing the Cluster mass Distribution Using Subaru weak Lensing data journal September 2007
Dark Matter Candidates from Particle Physics and Methods of Detection journal August 2010
Weak Gravitational Lensing by Large-Scale Structure journal September 2003
Handbook for the GREAT08 Challenge: An image analysis competition for cosmological lensing journal March 2009

Cited By (3)