DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Tuning goodness-of-fit tests†

Abstract

As modern precision cosmological measurements continue to show agreement with the broad features of the standard Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) cosmological model, we are increasingly motivated to look for small departures from the standard model’s predictions that might not be detected with standard approaches. While searches for extensions and modifications of ΛCDM have to date turned up no convincing evidence of beyond-the-standard-model cosmology, the list of models compared against ΛCDM is by no means complete and is often governed by readily coded modifications to standard Boltzmann codes. Also, standard goodness-of-fit methods such as a naive χ2 test fail to put strong pressure on the null hypothesis, since modern data sets have orders of magnitudes more degrees of freedom than the null hypothesis. Here we present a method of tuning goodness-of-fit tests to detect potential subdominant extra-ΛCDM signals present in the data through compressing observations in a way that maximizes extra-ΛCDM signal variation over noise and ΛCDM variation. This method, based on a Karhunen–Loève transformation of the data, is tuned to be maximally sensitive to particular types of variations characteristic of the tuning model, but unlike direct model comparison, the test is also sensitive to features that only partially mimicmore » the tuning model. As an example of its use, we apply this method in the context of a non-standard primordial spectrum compared against the 2015 Planck cosmic microwave background temperature power spectrum. We find no evidence for extra-ΛCDM physics.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [2];  [1]
  1. Department of Physics, University of California, Davis One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616, USA
  2. Department of Statistics, University of California, Davis One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616, USA
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Univ. of California, Davis, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
OSTI Identifier:
1492122
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1611318
Grant/Contract Number:  
SC-0009999; SC0019081; SC0009999
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Journal Volume: 484 Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 0035-8711
Publisher:
Royal Astronomical Society
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Subject:
79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS; Astronomy & Astrophysics; methods: statistical; cosmic background radiation

Citation Formats

Arrasmith, A., Follin, B., Anderes, E., and Knox, L. Tuning goodness-of-fit tests†. United Kingdom: N. p., 2019. Web. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz066.
Arrasmith, A., Follin, B., Anderes, E., & Knox, L. Tuning goodness-of-fit tests†. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz066
Arrasmith, A., Follin, B., Anderes, E., and Knox, L. Wed . "Tuning goodness-of-fit tests†". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz066.
@article{osti_1492122,
title = {Tuning goodness-of-fit tests†},
author = {Arrasmith, A. and Follin, B. and Anderes, E. and Knox, L.},
abstractNote = {As modern precision cosmological measurements continue to show agreement with the broad features of the standard Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) cosmological model, we are increasingly motivated to look for small departures from the standard model’s predictions that might not be detected with standard approaches. While searches for extensions and modifications of ΛCDM have to date turned up no convincing evidence of beyond-the-standard-model cosmology, the list of models compared against ΛCDM is by no means complete and is often governed by readily coded modifications to standard Boltzmann codes. Also, standard goodness-of-fit methods such as a naive χ2 test fail to put strong pressure on the null hypothesis, since modern data sets have orders of magnitudes more degrees of freedom than the null hypothesis. Here we present a method of tuning goodness-of-fit tests to detect potential subdominant extra-ΛCDM signals present in the data through compressing observations in a way that maximizes extra-ΛCDM signal variation over noise and ΛCDM variation. This method, based on a Karhunen–Loève transformation of the data, is tuned to be maximally sensitive to particular types of variations characteristic of the tuning model, but unlike direct model comparison, the test is also sensitive to features that only partially mimic the tuning model. As an example of its use, we apply this method in the context of a non-standard primordial spectrum compared against the 2015 Planck cosmic microwave background temperature power spectrum. We find no evidence for extra-ΛCDM physics.},
doi = {10.1093/mnras/stz066},
journal = {Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},
number = 2,
volume = 484,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Wed Jan 09 00:00:00 EST 2019},
month = {Wed Jan 09 00:00:00 EST 2019}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz066

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 1 work
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Signal-to-Noise Eigenmode Analysis of the Two-Year COBE Maps
journal, May 1995


CMB constraints on principal components of the inflaton potential
journal, August 2010


Measurement of the cosmic microwave background spectrum by the COBE FIRAS instrument
journal, January 1994

  • Mather, J. C.; Cheng, E. S.; Cottingham, D. A.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 420
  • DOI: 10.1086/173574

Planck 2015 results : XI. CMB power spectra, likelihoods, and robustness of parameters
journal, September 2016


Encyclopædia Inflationaris
journal, December 2014


Planck 2013 results. XXII. Constraints on inflation
journal, October 2014


Planck 2015 results : XIII. Cosmological parameters
journal, September 2016


Principal power of the CMB
journal, February 2004


Model-independent reionization observables in the CMB
journal, July 2003


Planck 2015 results : I. Overview of products and scientific results
journal, September 2016


QUANTIFYING DISCORDANCE IN THE 2015 PLANCK CMB SPECTRUM
journal, February 2016


Searching for dark matter in the CMB: A compact parametrization of energy injection from new physics
journal, February 2012


Estimating the power spectrum of the cosmic microwave background
journal, February 1998


NINE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE ( WMAP ) OBSERVATIONS: FINAL MAPS AND RESULTS
journal, September 2013

  • Bennett, C. L.; Larson, D.; Weiland, J. L.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 208, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/20