DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Self-calibration method for II and GI types of intrinsic alignments of galaxies

Abstract

We introduce a self-calibration method that can be applied to the intrinsic ellipticity–intrinsic ellipticity (II) and gravitational shear–intrinsic ellipticity (GI) types of intrinsic alignment of galaxies. The method combines previous self-calibration techniques with modifications to one of them in order to use autospectra in addition to cross-spectra between redshift bins. This allows one to use the self-calibration while preserving all the constraining power of cosmic shear from surveys. We show that the new method provides more flexibility in using various redshift bin widths. We perform cosmological parameter constraint forecast when this method is applied to the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope. Compared to the original self-calibration, we find that the new method provides further significant reduction in any residual shift in the cosmological parameters (e.g. factors of 2-4 for the dark energy equation of state) which is promising for accurate cosmology.

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3];
  1. Department of Physics, The University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX 75080, USA, Department of Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao-Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  2. Department of Physics, The University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX 75080, USA
  3. Department of Physics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States). National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC); Univ. of California, Oakland, CA (United States); Stanford Univ., CA (United States); Univ. of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
Contributing Org.:
LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration
OSTI Identifier:
1484404
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1543977
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-05CH11231; AC02-76SF00515; SC0019206
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Journal Volume: 483 Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 0035-8711
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Subject:
79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS; Astronomy & Astrophysics

Citation Formats

Yao, Ji, Ishak, Mustapha, Troxel, M. A., and LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration. Self-calibration method for II and GI types of intrinsic alignments of galaxies. United Kingdom: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3188.
Yao, Ji, Ishak, Mustapha, Troxel, M. A., & LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration. Self-calibration method for II and GI types of intrinsic alignments of galaxies. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty3188
Yao, Ji, Ishak, Mustapha, Troxel, M. A., and LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration. Mon . "Self-calibration method for II and GI types of intrinsic alignments of galaxies". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty3188.
@article{osti_1484404,
title = {Self-calibration method for II and GI types of intrinsic alignments of galaxies},
author = {Yao, Ji and Ishak, Mustapha and Troxel, M. A. and LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration},
abstractNote = {We introduce a self-calibration method that can be applied to the intrinsic ellipticity–intrinsic ellipticity (II) and gravitational shear–intrinsic ellipticity (GI) types of intrinsic alignment of galaxies. The method combines previous self-calibration techniques with modifications to one of them in order to use autospectra in addition to cross-spectra between redshift bins. This allows one to use the self-calibration while preserving all the constraining power of cosmic shear from surveys. We show that the new method provides more flexibility in using various redshift bin widths. We perform cosmological parameter constraint forecast when this method is applied to the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope. Compared to the original self-calibration, we find that the new method provides further significant reduction in any residual shift in the cosmological parameters (e.g. factors of 2-4 for the dark energy equation of state) which is promising for accurate cosmology.},
doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty3188},
journal = {Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},
number = 1,
volume = 483,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Mon Nov 26 00:00:00 EST 2018},
month = {Mon Nov 26 00:00:00 EST 2018}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty3188

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 7 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Numerical simulations of weak lensing measurements
journal, August 2001


Shapes and Shears, Stars and Smears: Optimal Measurements for Weak Lensing
journal, February 2002

  • Bernstein, G. M.; Jarvis, M.
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 123, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/338085

Photometric redshifts for the Kilo-Degree Survey: Machine-learning analysis with artificial neural networks
journal, August 2018


Tidal alignment of galaxies
journal, August 2015

  • Blazek, Jonathan; Vlah, Zvonimir; Seljak, Uroš
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2015, Issue 08
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/08/015

Dark energy constraints from cosmic shear power spectra: impact of intrinsic alignments on photometric redshift requirements
journal, December 2007


Intrinsic and extrinsic galaxy alignment
journal, January 2001


The effective number density of galaxies for weak lensing measurements in the LSST project
journal, July 2013

  • Chang, C.; Jarvis, M.; Jain, B.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 434, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1156

Galaxy–halo alignments in the Horizon-AGN cosmological hydrodynamical simulation
journal, August 2017

  • Chisari, N. E.; Koukoufilippas, N.; Jindal, A.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 472, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1998

A prescription for galaxy biasing evolution as a nuisance parameter
journal, February 2015

  • Clerkin, L.; Kirk, D.; Lahav, O.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 448, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu2754

Spatial curvature and cosmological tests of general relativity
journal, November 2012


Effects of dark energy perturbations on cosmological tests of general relativity
journal, November 2013


How accurately can we measure weak gravitational shear?
journal, February 2001


Alignment between galaxies and large-scale structure
journal, January 2009

  • Faltenbacher, A.; Li, Cheng; White, Simon D. M.
  • Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 9, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1088/1674-4527/9/1/004

Weak lensing: Dark Matter, Dark Energy and Dark Gravity
journal, October 2009


Intrinsic correlation of galaxy shapes: implications for weak lensing measurements
journal, December 2000


Weak lensing with COMBO-17: estimation and removal of intrinsic alignments
journal, January 2004


KiDS-450: cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing
journal, November 2016

  • Hildebrandt, H.; Viola, M.; Heymans, C.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 465, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2805

Shear calibration biases in weak-lensing surveys
journal, August 2003


Intrinsic galaxy alignments from the 2SLAQ and SDSS surveys: luminosity and redshift scalings and implications for weak lensing surveys: Intrinsic alignments
journal, September 2007

  • Hirata, Christopher M.; Mandelbaum, Rachel; Ishak, Mustapha
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 381, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12312.x

Weak Lensing: Prospects for Measuring Cosmological Parameters
journal, April 1999

  • Hu, Wayne; Tegmark, Max
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 514, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/311947

Nulling tomography with weak gravitational lensing
journal, August 2005


Probing decisive answers to dark energy questions from cosmic complementarity and lensing tomography
journal, October 2005


Remarks on the Formulation of the Cosmological Constant/Dark Energy Problems
journal, September 2007


Weak lensing and CMB: Parameter forecasts including a running spectral index
journal, April 2004


Probing cosmic acceleration beyond the equation of state: Distinguishing between dark energy and modified gravity models
journal, August 2006


Galaxy Alignments: An Overview
journal, July 2015

  • Joachimi, Benjamin; Cacciato, Marcello; Kitching, Thomas D.
  • Space Science Reviews, Vol. 193, Issue 1-4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11214-015-0177-4

The removal of shear-ellipticity correlations from the cosmic shear signal via nulling techniques
journal, July 2008


Constraints on intrinsic alignment contamination of weak lensing surveys using the MegaZ-LRG sample
journal, January 2011


Intrinsic galaxy shapes and alignments – II. Modelling the intrinsic alignment contamination of weak lensing surveys
journal, September 2013

  • Joachimi, B.; Semboloni, E.; Hilbert, S.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 436, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1618

CFHTLenS revisited: assessing concordance with Planck including astrophysical systematics
journal, October 2016

  • Joudaki, Shahab; Blake, Chris; Heymans, Catherine
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 465, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2665

Weak lensing and dark energy: The impact of dark energy on nonlinear dark matter clustering
journal, July 2009


Weak gravitational lensing of distant galaxies
journal, March 1992

  • Kaiser, Nick
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 388
  • DOI: 10.1086/171151

Galaxy Alignments: Theory, Modelling & Simulations
journal, September 2015

  • Kiessling, Alina; Cacciato, Marcello; Joachimi, Benjamin
  • Space Science Reviews, Vol. 193, Issue 1-4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11214-015-0203-6

Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
journal, July 2015


Cosmic shear as a tool for precision cosmology: minimising intrinsic galaxy alignment-lensing interference
journal, September 2005


Galaxy Alignments: Observations and Impact on Cosmology
journal, October 2015

  • Kirk, Donnacha; Brown, Michael L.; Hoekstra, Henk
  • Space Science Reviews, Vol. 193, Issue 1-4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11214-015-0213-4

The cosmological impact of intrinsic alignment model choice for cosmic shear
journal, August 2012


The impact of intrinsic alignment on current and future cosmic shear surveys
journal, December 2015

  • Krause, Elisabeth; Eifler, Tim; Blazek, Jonathan
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 456, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2615

Parameterized beyond-Einstein growth
journal, December 2007


Effects of Photometric Redshift Uncertainties on Weak‐Lensing Tomography
journal, January 2006

  • Ma, Zhaoming; Hu, Wayne; Huterer, Dragan
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 636, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/497068

Detection of large-scale intrinsic ellipticity--density correlation from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and implications for weak lensing surveys
journal, April 2006


Verifications of Scaling Relations Useful for the Intrinsic Alignment Self-calibration
journal, August 2018


Intrinsic Ellipticity Correlation of sdss Luminous red Galaxies and Misalignment with Their host dark Matter Halos
journal, March 2009


Weak Gravitational Lensing by Large-Scale Structure
journal, September 2003


A halo model for intrinsic alignments of galaxy ellipticities
journal, March 2010


Sources of contamination to weak lensing tomography: redshift-dependent shear measurement bias
journal, August 2009

  • Semboloni, Elisabetta; Tereno, Ismael; van Waerbeke, Ludovic
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 397, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14926.x

Intrinsic alignments of SDSS-III BOSS LOWZ sample galaxies
journal, May 2015

  • Singh, Sukhdeep; Mandelbaum, Rachel; More, Surhud
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 450, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv778

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear
journal, August 2018


Self-calibration technique for three-point intrinsic alignment correlations in weak lensing surveys: GGI self-calibration
journal, December 2011


Self-calibration for three-point intrinsic alignment autocorrelations in weak lensing surveys: Three-point IA self-calibration
journal, May 2012


Self-calibrating the gravitational shear–intrinsic ellipticity–intrinsic ellipticity cross-correlation: GII self-calibration
journal, November 2012


Angular ellipticity correlations in a composite alignment model for elliptical and spiral galaxies and inference from weak lensing
journal, February 2018

  • Tugendhat, Tim M.; Schäfer, Björn Malte
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 476, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty323

Observational probes of cosmic acceleration
journal, September 2013


The rotational excitation of methanol by molecular hydrogen: The rotational excitation of methanol by H2
journal, May 2010


Self-Calibration of Gravitational Shear-Galaxy Intrinsic Ellipticity Correlation in weak Lensing Surveys
journal, August 2010


CosmoSIS: Modular cosmological parameter estimation
journal, September 2015


Works referencing / citing this record:

Towards determining the neutrino mass hierarchy: weak lensing and galaxy clustering forecasts with baryons and intrinsic alignments
journal, February 2020

  • Copeland, David; Taylor, Andy; Hall, Alex
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 493, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa314

Intrinsic alignment statistics of density and velocity fields at large scales: Formulation, modeling, and baryon acoustic oscillation features
journal, November 2019