DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: A Review of Approaches for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Regional River Habitat Restoration Programs

Abstract

Abstract Large regional programs to restore riverine habitat for fish and aquatic organisms have become common throughout North America, Europe, and elsewhere. Evaluating the effectiveness of projects implemented under these programs—sometimes called programmatic monitoring and evaluation—has proven challenging, and little guidance exists on programmatic monitoring and evaluation approaches and their effectiveness. In this paper, we review different approaches for evaluating the effectiveness of river restoration projects implemented across a region. These programmatic monitoring and evaluation approaches include case studies, meta‐analyses, multiple before–after control–impact ( mBACI ), extensive posttreatment ( EPT ), intensively monitored watersheds ( IMW s), and hybrid programmatic approaches that use a combination of different experimental designs. For each approach, we discuss the pros and cons as well as provide examples. The most appropriate approach depends in part on the questions that the programmatic monitoring and evaluation strives to address, the spatial and temporal scale at which detection of a response is expected, and the scale of inference. Case studies and mBACI approaches can answer questions about individual projects but have several limitations in terms of cost, timely results, and feasibility. A meta‐analysis, which can provide broadly applicable results, is dependent upon a large number of case studiesmore » being completed. The EPT approach can provide relatively quick and easy‐to‐interpret results, but it requires a large population of completed projects and careful selection of controls. The IMW approach has been broadly applied in western North America but has had limited success and appears to be tractable only in small catchments where restoration and monitoring can be well controlled. Based on results from recent efforts in the USA and Europe, the most feasible programmatic monitoring and evaluation approach in terms of cost, implementability, and production of timely results appears to be a hybrid approach that uses a combination of the EPT and mBACI approaches.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [2]
  1. Cramer Fish Sciences Watershed Sciences Lab 1125 12th Avenue Northwest, Suite B‐1 Issaquah Washington 98027 USA, School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington 1122 Northeast Boat Street Seattle Washington 98105 USA
  2. Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology Department of Surface Waters, Research and Management Seestrasse 79 6047 Kastanienbaum Switzerland
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1476660
Resource Type:
Publisher's Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
North American Journal of Fisheries Management
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: North American Journal of Fisheries Management Journal Volume: 38 Journal Issue: 5; Journal ID: ISSN 0275-5947
Publisher:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Roni, Philip, Åberg, Ulrika, and Weber, Christine. A Review of Approaches for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Regional River Habitat Restoration Programs. United States: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1002/nafm.10222.
Roni, Philip, Åberg, Ulrika, & Weber, Christine. A Review of Approaches for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Regional River Habitat Restoration Programs. United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10222
Roni, Philip, Åberg, Ulrika, and Weber, Christine. Fri . "A Review of Approaches for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Regional River Habitat Restoration Programs". United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10222.
@article{osti_1476660,
title = {A Review of Approaches for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Regional River Habitat Restoration Programs},
author = {Roni, Philip and Åberg, Ulrika and Weber, Christine},
abstractNote = {Abstract Large regional programs to restore riverine habitat for fish and aquatic organisms have become common throughout North America, Europe, and elsewhere. Evaluating the effectiveness of projects implemented under these programs—sometimes called programmatic monitoring and evaluation—has proven challenging, and little guidance exists on programmatic monitoring and evaluation approaches and their effectiveness. In this paper, we review different approaches for evaluating the effectiveness of river restoration projects implemented across a region. These programmatic monitoring and evaluation approaches include case studies, meta‐analyses, multiple before–after control–impact ( mBACI ), extensive posttreatment ( EPT ), intensively monitored watersheds ( IMW s), and hybrid programmatic approaches that use a combination of different experimental designs. For each approach, we discuss the pros and cons as well as provide examples. The most appropriate approach depends in part on the questions that the programmatic monitoring and evaluation strives to address, the spatial and temporal scale at which detection of a response is expected, and the scale of inference. Case studies and mBACI approaches can answer questions about individual projects but have several limitations in terms of cost, timely results, and feasibility. A meta‐analysis, which can provide broadly applicable results, is dependent upon a large number of case studies being completed. The EPT approach can provide relatively quick and easy‐to‐interpret results, but it requires a large population of completed projects and careful selection of controls. The IMW approach has been broadly applied in western North America but has had limited success and appears to be tractable only in small catchments where restoration and monitoring can be well controlled. Based on results from recent efforts in the USA and Europe, the most feasible programmatic monitoring and evaluation approach in terms of cost, implementability, and production of timely results appears to be a hybrid approach that uses a combination of the EPT and mBACI approaches.},
doi = {10.1002/nafm.10222},
journal = {North American Journal of Fisheries Management},
number = 5,
volume = 38,
place = {United States},
year = {Fri Oct 05 00:00:00 EDT 2018},
month = {Fri Oct 05 00:00:00 EDT 2018}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10222

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 22 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Designs for Evaluating Local and Regional Scale Trends
journal, January 2001


Effect Size in Ecological Experiments: The Application of Biological Models in Meta‐Analysis
journal, December 1997

  • Osenberg, Craig W.; Sarnelle, Orlando; Cooper, Scott D.
  • The American Naturalist, Vol. 150, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1086/286095

Do in-stream restoration structures enhance salmonid abundance? A meta-analysis
journal, May 2010

  • Whiteway, Sarah L.; Biron, Pascale M.; Zimmermann, André
  • Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Vol. 67, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1139/F10-021

Effects of increasing winter rearing habitat on abundance of salmonids in two coastal Oregon streams
journal, May 2000

  • Solazzi, M. F.; Nickelson, T. E.; Johnson, S. L.
  • Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Vol. 57, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1139/f00-030

Rehabilitation of bedrock stream channels: the effects of boulder weir placement on aquatic habitat and biota
journal, January 2006

  • Roni, Phil; Bennett, Todd; Morley, Sarah
  • River Research and Applications, Vol. 22, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1002/rra.954

Global Review of the Physical and Biological Effectiveness of Stream Habitat Rehabilitation Techniques
journal, June 2008

  • Roni, Phil; Hanson, Karrie; Beechie, Tim
  • North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Vol. 28, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1577/M06-169.1

Effects of Wood Placement on Movements of Trout and Juvenile Coho Salmon in Natural and Artificial Stream Channels
journal, July 2001


Hydromorphological restoration of running waters: effects on benthic invertebrate assemblages: Benthic invertebrate response to restoration
journal, April 2011


Experimental Evidence on the Value of Trout Stream Improvement in Michigan
journal, January 1937


Twenty years of stream restoration in Finland: little response by benthic macroinvertebrate communities
journal, September 2011

  • Louhi, Pauliina; Mykrä, Heikki; Paavola, Riku
  • Ecological Applications, Vol. 21, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1890/10-0591.1

Pulsed Monitoring for Watershed and Stream Restoration
journal, November 1995


The Economic and Employment Impacts of Forest and Watershed Restoration
journal, July 2012


Cautions on using the Before-After-Control-Impact design in environmental effects monitoring programs
journal, May 2017


Long-term monitoring reveals the success of salmonid habitat restoration
journal, December 2016

  • Louhi, Pauliina; Vehanen, Teppo; Huusko, Ari
  • Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Vol. 73, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-2015-0546

Evaluation of Instream Enhancement Structures for Salmonid Spawning and Rearing in a Coastal Oregon Stream
journal, April 1985


ECOLOGY: Synthesizing U.S. River Restoration Efforts
journal, April 2005


Effectiveness of Habitat Manipulation for Wild Salmonids in Wyoming Streams
journal, August 2004

  • Binns, N. Allen
  • North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Vol. 24, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1577/M03-101.1

The Epidemiology of Monitoring1
journal, August 2001


Response of trout populations in five Colorado streams two decades after habitat manipulation
journal, December 2011

  • White, Shannon L.; Gowan, Charles; Fausch, Kurt D.
  • Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Vol. 68, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1139/f2011-125

A Comparison of the Performance and Compatibility of Protocols Used by Seven Monitoring Groups to Measure Stream Habitat in the Pacific Northwest
journal, April 2010

  • Roper, Brett B.; Buffington, John M.; Bennett, Stephen
  • North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Vol. 30, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1577/M09-061.1

Assessing restoration effects on hydromorphology in European mid-sized rivers by key hydromorphological parameters
journal, October 2015


Effects of Natural-Channel-Design Restoration on Habitat Quality in Catskill Mountain Streams, New York
journal, March 2010

  • Ernst, Anne G.; Baldigo, Barry P.; Mulvihill, Christiane I.
  • Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, Vol. 139, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1577/T08-153.1

The effect of river restoration on fish, macroinvertebrates and aquatic macrophytes: A meta-analysis
journal, November 2015


How is success or failure in river restoration projects evaluated? Feedback from French restoration projects
journal, May 2014


On Beyond BACI: Sampling Designs that Might Reliably Detect Environmental Disturbances
journal, February 1994

  • Underwood, A. J.
  • Ecological Applications, Vol. 4, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.2307/1942110

Response of fish assemblages to hydromorphological restoration in central and northern European rivers
journal, July 2015


Long-Term Demographic Responses of Trout Populations to Habitat Manipulation in Six Colorado Streams
journal, August 1996

  • Gowan, Charles; Fausch, Kurt D.
  • Ecological Applications, Vol. 6, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.2307/2269496

A Long-Term Evaluation of Trout Habitat Development and Its Relation to Improving Management-Related Research
journal, May 1976


Experimental Designs for Estimating Transient Responses to Management Disturbances
journal, March 1988

  • Walters, Carl J.; Collie, Jeremy S.; Webb, Timothy
  • Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Vol. 45, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1139/f88-062

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
journal, July 2009


Comparing Stream Restoration Project Effectiveness Using a Programmatic Evaluation of Salmonid Habitat and Fish Response
journal, May 2016

  • O’Neal, Jennifer S.; Roni, Phil; Crawford, Bruce
  • North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Vol. 36, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1080/02755947.2016.1165773

Effects of an increase in large wood on abundance and survival of juvenile salmonids ( Oncorhynchus spp.) in an Oregon coastal stream
journal, February 2005

  • Johnson, Steven L.; Rodgers, Jeffrey D.; Solazzi, Mario F.
  • Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Vol. 62, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1139/f04-222

Juvenile salmonid ( Oncorhynchus spp.) use of constructed and natural side channels in Pacific Northwest rivers
journal, December 2005

  • Morley, Sarah A.; Garcia, Patricia S.; Bennett, Todd R.
  • Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Vol. 62, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1139/f05-185

Contrasting the roles of section length and instream habitat enhancement for river restoration success: a field study of 20 European restoration projects
journal, September 2015

  • Hering, Daniel; Aroviita, Jukka; Baattrup-Pedersen, Annette
  • Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 52, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12531

Detection of Regional Trends in Salmonid Habitat in Coastal Streams, Oregon
journal, February 2011

  • Anlauf, Kara J.; Gaeuman, William; Jones, Kim K.
  • Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, Vol. 140, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1080/00028487.2010.550496

Streambank Restoration Effectiveness: Lessons Learned from a Comparative Study
journal, June 2007


Long-term, habitat-specific response of a macroinvertebrate community to river restoration
journal, January 1998


Ecological effects of rehabilitation measures at the Austrian Danube: a meta-analysis of fish assemblages
journal, April 2013


Standards for ecologically successful river restoration: Ecological success in river restoration
journal, March 2005


Estimating the Size and Impact of the Ecological Restoration Economy
journal, June 2015


Assessment of a catchmentwide salmon habitat rehabilitation scheme on a drained river system in Northern Ireland
journal, May 2014

  • Kennedy, R. J.; Johnston, P.; Allen, M.
  • Fisheries Management and Ecology, Vol. 21, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1111/fme.12077

Detecting persistent change in the habitat of salmon-bearing streams in the Pacific Northwest
journal, February 2004

  • Larsen, David P.; Kaufmann, Philip R.; Kincaid, Thomas M.
  • Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Vol. 61, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1139/f03-157

Development of Vegetation and Aquatic Habitat in Restored Riparian Sites of California's North Coast Rangelands
journal, March 2011


Stream Restoration and Enhancement Projects: Is Anyone Monitoring?
journal, June 2002


The Use (and Abuse) of Meta-Analysis in Environmental and Natural Resource Economics: An Assessment
journal, December 2008


A Review of Stream Restoration Techniques and a Hierarchical Strategy for Prioritizing Restoration in Pacific Northwest Watersheds
journal, February 2002


Goals and principles for programmatic river restoration monitoring and evaluation: collaborative learning across multiple projects: Programmatic river restoration monitoring and evaluation
journal, October 2017

  • Weber, Christine; Åberg, Ulrika; Buijse, Anthonie D.
  • Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, Vol. 5, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/wat2.1257

Five Elements for Effective Evaluation of Stream Restoration
journal, June 1995


Giants' shoulders 15 years later: lessons, challenges and guidelines in fisheries meta-analysis
journal, October 2013

  • Thorson, James T.; Cope, Jason M.; Kleisner, Kristin M.
  • Fish and Fisheries, Vol. 16, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1111/faf.12061

Pattern and Process in a Forested Ecosystem
book, January 1994


Structural and functional responses of floodplain vegetation to stream ecosystem restoration
journal, July 2015