DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Predicting impacts of chemicals from organisms to ecosystem service delivery: A case study of endocrine disruptor effects on trout

Abstract

We demonstrate how mechanistic modeling can be used to predict whether and how biological responses to chemicals at (sub)organismal levels in model species (i.e., what we typically measure) translate into impacts on ecosystem service delivery (i.e., what we care about). We consider a hypothetical case study of two species of trout, brown trout (Salmo trutta; BT) and greenback cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii stomias; GCT). These hypothetical populations live in a high-altitude river system and are exposed to human-derived estrogen (17α-ethinyl estradiol, EE2), which is the bioactive estrogen in many contraceptives. We use the individual-based model inSTREAM to explore how seasonally varying concentrations of EE2 could influence male spawning and sperm quality. Resulting impacts on trout recruitment and the consequences of such for anglers and for the continued viability of populations of GCT (the state fish of Colorado) are explored. inSTREAM incorporates seasonally varying river flow and temperature, fishing pressure, the influence of EE2 on species-specific demography, and inter-specific competition. The model facilitates quantitative exploration of the relative importance of endocrine disruption and inter-species competition on trout population dynamics. Simulations predicted constant EE2 loading to have more impacts on GCT than BT. However, increasing removal of BT by anglers can enhancemore » the persistence of GCT and offset some of the negative effects of EE2. We demonstrate how models that quantitatively link impacts of chemicals and other stressors on individual survival, growth, and reproduction to consequences for populations and ecosystem service delivery, can be coupled with ecosystem service valuation. The approach facilitates interpretation of toxicity data in an ecological context and gives beneficiaries of ecosystem services a more explicit role in management decisions. Although challenges remain, this type of approach may be particularly helpful for site-specific risk assessments and those in which tradeoffs and synergies among ecosystem services need to be considered.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [1];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [6];  [7];  [8];  [9];  [7];  [10];  [11];  [12];  [13]
  1. Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (United States)
  2. Lang Railsback & Associates, Arcata, CA (United States)
  3. Univ. of California, Santa Barbara, CA (United States)
  4. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Cincinnati, OH (United States)
  5. Bayer AG, Monheaim am Rhein (Germany)
  6. Syngenta Crop Protections, LLC, Greensboro, NC (United States)
  7. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Washington, DC (United States)
  8. USDA Forest Service, Arcata, CA (United States). Pacific Southwest Research Station
  9. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
  10. Integreal Consulting, Woodinville, WA (United States)
  11. Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE (United States)
  12. Syngenta, Bracknell (United Kingdom)
  13. Towson Univ., Towson, MD (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1470856
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1761215
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725; DBI-1300426
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Science of the Total Environment
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 649; Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 0048-9697
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Citation Formats

Forbes, Valery E., Railsback, Steve, Accolla, Chiara, Birnir, Bjorn, Bruins, Randall J. F., Ducrot, Virginie, Galic, Nika, Garber, Kristina, Harvey, Bret C., Jager, Henriette I., Kanarek, Andrew, Pastorok, Robert, Rebarber, Richard, Thorbek, Pernille, and Salice, Chris J. Predicting impacts of chemicals from organisms to ecosystem service delivery: A case study of endocrine disruptor effects on trout. United States: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.344.
Forbes, Valery E., Railsback, Steve, Accolla, Chiara, Birnir, Bjorn, Bruins, Randall J. F., Ducrot, Virginie, Galic, Nika, Garber, Kristina, Harvey, Bret C., Jager, Henriette I., Kanarek, Andrew, Pastorok, Robert, Rebarber, Richard, Thorbek, Pernille, & Salice, Chris J. Predicting impacts of chemicals from organisms to ecosystem service delivery: A case study of endocrine disruptor effects on trout. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.344
Forbes, Valery E., Railsback, Steve, Accolla, Chiara, Birnir, Bjorn, Bruins, Randall J. F., Ducrot, Virginie, Galic, Nika, Garber, Kristina, Harvey, Bret C., Jager, Henriette I., Kanarek, Andrew, Pastorok, Robert, Rebarber, Richard, Thorbek, Pernille, and Salice, Chris J. Tue . "Predicting impacts of chemicals from organisms to ecosystem service delivery: A case study of endocrine disruptor effects on trout". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.344. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1470856.
@article{osti_1470856,
title = {Predicting impacts of chemicals from organisms to ecosystem service delivery: A case study of endocrine disruptor effects on trout},
author = {Forbes, Valery E. and Railsback, Steve and Accolla, Chiara and Birnir, Bjorn and Bruins, Randall J. F. and Ducrot, Virginie and Galic, Nika and Garber, Kristina and Harvey, Bret C. and Jager, Henriette I. and Kanarek, Andrew and Pastorok, Robert and Rebarber, Richard and Thorbek, Pernille and Salice, Chris J.},
abstractNote = {We demonstrate how mechanistic modeling can be used to predict whether and how biological responses to chemicals at (sub)organismal levels in model species (i.e., what we typically measure) translate into impacts on ecosystem service delivery (i.e., what we care about). We consider a hypothetical case study of two species of trout, brown trout (Salmo trutta; BT) and greenback cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii stomias; GCT). These hypothetical populations live in a high-altitude river system and are exposed to human-derived estrogen (17α-ethinyl estradiol, EE2), which is the bioactive estrogen in many contraceptives. We use the individual-based model inSTREAM to explore how seasonally varying concentrations of EE2 could influence male spawning and sperm quality. Resulting impacts on trout recruitment and the consequences of such for anglers and for the continued viability of populations of GCT (the state fish of Colorado) are explored. inSTREAM incorporates seasonally varying river flow and temperature, fishing pressure, the influence of EE2 on species-specific demography, and inter-specific competition. The model facilitates quantitative exploration of the relative importance of endocrine disruption and inter-species competition on trout population dynamics. Simulations predicted constant EE2 loading to have more impacts on GCT than BT. However, increasing removal of BT by anglers can enhance the persistence of GCT and offset some of the negative effects of EE2. We demonstrate how models that quantitatively link impacts of chemicals and other stressors on individual survival, growth, and reproduction to consequences for populations and ecosystem service delivery, can be coupled with ecosystem service valuation. The approach facilitates interpretation of toxicity data in an ecological context and gives beneficiaries of ecosystem services a more explicit role in management decisions. Although challenges remain, this type of approach may be particularly helpful for site-specific risk assessments and those in which tradeoffs and synergies among ecosystem services need to be considered.},
doi = {10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.344},
journal = {Science of the Total Environment},
number = C,
volume = 649,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Aug 28 00:00:00 EDT 2018},
month = {Tue Aug 28 00:00:00 EDT 2018}
}

Journal Article:

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 19 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

A Review of Catch-and-Release Angling Mortality with Implications for No-take Reserves
journal, February 2005

  • Bartholomew, Aaron; Bohnsack, James A.
  • Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, Vol. 15, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11160-005-2175-1

What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units
journal, August 2007


Metapopulation dynamics and stochastic bioeconomic modeling
journal, August 1999


Predicted-no-effect concentrations for the steroid estrogens estrone, 17β-estradiol, estriol, and 17α-ethinylestradiol
journal, April 2012

  • Caldwell, Daniel J.; Mastrocco, Frank; Anderson, Paul D.
  • Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Vol. 31, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/etc.1825

A Framework for Developing Management Goals for Species at Risk with Examples from Military Installations in the United States
journal, October 2009

  • Efroymson, Rebecca; Jager, Henriette; Dale, Virginia
  • Environmental Management, Vol. 44, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00267-009-9385-6

Developing predictive systems models to address complexity and relevance for ecological risk assessment: PSMs for ERA
journal, June 2013

  • Forbes, Valery E.; Calow, Peter
  • Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, Vol. 9, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1425

The Extrapolation Problem and how Population Modeling can help
journal, January 2008

  • Forbes, Valery E.; Calow, Peter; Sibly, Richard M.
  • Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Vol. 27, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1897/08-029.1

A framework for predicting impacts on ecosystem services from (sub)organismal responses to chemicals
journal, March 2017

  • Forbes, Valery E.; Salice, Chris J.; Birnir, Bjorn
  • Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Vol. 36, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/etc.3720

Mechanistic effect modeling for ecological risk assessment: Where to go from here?: Mechanistic Effect Modeling
journal, June 2013

  • Grimm, Volker; Martin, Benjamin T.
  • Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, Vol. 9, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1423

Effects of Passage Barriers on Demographics and Stability Properties of a Virtual Trout Population: Effects of Barriers on Trout Populations
journal, August 2011

  • Harvey, B. C.; Railsback, S. F.
  • River Research and Applications, Vol. 28, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/rra.1574

Contingent valuation, net marginal benefits, and the scale of riparian ecosystem restoration
journal, May 2004


How to use mechanistic effect models in environmental risk assessment of pesticides: Case studies and recommendations from the SETAC workshop MODELINK: MODELINK workshop summary
journal, October 2015

  • Hommen, Udo; Forbes, Valery; Grimm, Volker
  • Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, Vol. 12, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1704

Pharmaceuticals, Hormones, and Other Organic Wastewater Contaminants in U.S. Streams, 1999−2000:  A National Reconnaissance
journal, March 2002

  • Kolpin, Dana W.; Furlong, Edward T.; Meyer, Michael T.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 36, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1021/es011055j

Population-relevant endpoints in the evaluation of endocrine-active substances (EAS) for ecotoxicological hazard and risk assessment: Population-Relevant Endocrine Endpoints
journal, February 2017

  • Marty, Mary S.; Blankinship, Amy; Chambers, Janice
  • Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, Vol. 13, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1887

Experimental Effects of Nonnative Brown Trout on the Individual- and Population-Level Performance of Native Bonneville Cutthroat Trout
journal, November 2006

  • McHugh, Peter; Budy, Phaedra
  • Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, Vol. 135, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1577/T05-309.1

The impact of trout introductions on macro- and micro-invertebrate communities of fishless boreal lakes
journal, February 2016

  • Milardi, Marco; Siitonen, Susanna; Lappalainen, Jyrki
  • Journal of Paleolimnology, Vol. 55, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10933-016-9879-1

Where is the consensus? A proposed foundation for moving ecosystem service concepts into practice
journal, May 2012


Benefit Transfer Challenges: Perspectives from U.S. Practitioners
journal, February 2018

  • Newbold, Stephen; David Simpson, R.; Matthew Massey, D.
  • Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 69, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10640-017-0207-7

Development of a framework based on an ecosystem services approach for deriving specific protection goals for environmental risk assessment of pesticides
journal, January 2012


Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies
journal, September 2010

  • Power, Alison G.
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 365, Issue 1554
  • DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0143

Effects of Spatial Extent on Modeled Relations between Habitat and Anadromous Salmonid Spawning Success
journal, October 2015

  • Railsback, Steven F.; Harvey, Bret C.; White, Jason L.
  • Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, Vol. 144, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1080/00028487.2015.1079553

Sensitivity of brown trout reproduction to long-term estrogenic exposure
journal, October 2008


Short-term exposure to 17α-ethynylestradiol decreases the fertility of sexually maturing male rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss )
journal, June 2003

  • Schultz, Irvin R.; Skillman, Ann; Nicolas, Jean-Marc
  • Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Vol. 22, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/etc.5620220613

P OPULATION -L EVEL E FFECTS OF P ESTICIDES AND O THER T OXICANTS ON A RTHROPODS
journal, January 2003


Interactions between stochastic and deterministic processes in stream fish community assembly
journal, January 1993

  • Strange, Elizabeth M.; Moyle, Peter B.; Foin, Theodore C.
  • Environmental Biology of Fishes, Vol. 36, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF00005973

Works referencing / citing this record:

Analysis of an Ecological Flow Regime during the Ctenopharyngodon Idella Spawning Period Based on Reservoir Operations
journal, September 2019


Applying ecosystem services for pre‐market environmental risk assessments of regulated stressors
journal, July 2019