DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Recognizing economic value in multifunctional buffers in the lower Mississippi river basin: The value proposition of multi-functional riparian buffers

Abstract

Integrating conservation practices with bioenergy has been recommended as a promising strategy to improve bioeconomy and water quality but the literature on the economics of this strategy is limited. This study evaluated the value proposition of reducing nutrient loss from cropland by implementing switchgrass riparian buffers in the Lower Mississippi River Basin (LMRB). Nutrient loss was simulated by using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool. The value proposition of nutrient abatement was quantified by estimating (1) value of trapped nutrients as fertilizer and (2) potential net returns of harvesting switchgrass as bioenergy feedstock at different farm-gate prices. Results suggest that switchgrass buffers may reduce mean annual total nitrogen and total phosphorus loads from cropland in the LMRB by 23% and 31%, respectively. The value of trapped nutrients is considerable (mean = $69 ha-1 year-1) but far less than the cost of implementing a switchgrass buffer (mean = 163 dollars ha-1 year-1). At biomass prices of 20 dollars, 40 dollars, 60 dollars, and 80 dollars per dry-ton, mean net returns of switchgrass buffers (without considering land-use change from cropland to buffers) were estimated to be around -66 dollars, 199 dollars, 463 dollars, and 727 dollars ha-1 year-1, respectively. Total net returnsmore » for the LMRB may be reduced by 20% if switchgrass is grown without the addition of commercial fertilizer. The results highlight the potential of switchgrass buffers for improving water sustainability of both agricultural and bioenergy production. The value proposition of switchgrass buffers is nevertheless sensitive to future feedstock price. The impact of fertilizer prices change and forgone income on benefit analysis is also presented.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont Illinois 60439 USA
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)
OSTI Identifier:
1467920
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1467922; OSTI ID: 1493898
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-06CH11357
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining Journal Volume: 13 Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 1932-104X
Publisher:
Wiley
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Subject:
09 BIOMASS FUELS; riparian buffer; bioenergy; economics; nutrient retention; water quality

Citation Formats

Xu, Hui, Wu, May, and Ha, Miae. Recognizing economic value in multifunctional buffers in the lower Mississippi river basin: The value proposition of multi-functional riparian buffers. United Kingdom: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1002/bbb.1930.
Xu, Hui, Wu, May, & Ha, Miae. Recognizing economic value in multifunctional buffers in the lower Mississippi river basin: The value proposition of multi-functional riparian buffers. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1930
Xu, Hui, Wu, May, and Ha, Miae. Fri . "Recognizing economic value in multifunctional buffers in the lower Mississippi river basin: The value proposition of multi-functional riparian buffers". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1930.
@article{osti_1467920,
title = {Recognizing economic value in multifunctional buffers in the lower Mississippi river basin: The value proposition of multi-functional riparian buffers},
author = {Xu, Hui and Wu, May and Ha, Miae},
abstractNote = {Integrating conservation practices with bioenergy has been recommended as a promising strategy to improve bioeconomy and water quality but the literature on the economics of this strategy is limited. This study evaluated the value proposition of reducing nutrient loss from cropland by implementing switchgrass riparian buffers in the Lower Mississippi River Basin (LMRB). Nutrient loss was simulated by using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool. The value proposition of nutrient abatement was quantified by estimating (1) value of trapped nutrients as fertilizer and (2) potential net returns of harvesting switchgrass as bioenergy feedstock at different farm-gate prices. Results suggest that switchgrass buffers may reduce mean annual total nitrogen and total phosphorus loads from cropland in the LMRB by 23% and 31%, respectively. The value of trapped nutrients is considerable (mean = $69 ha-1 year-1) but far less than the cost of implementing a switchgrass buffer (mean = 163 dollars ha-1 year-1). At biomass prices of 20 dollars, 40 dollars, 60 dollars, and 80 dollars per dry-ton, mean net returns of switchgrass buffers (without considering land-use change from cropland to buffers) were estimated to be around -66 dollars, 199 dollars, 463 dollars, and 727 dollars ha-1 year-1, respectively. Total net returns for the LMRB may be reduced by 20% if switchgrass is grown without the addition of commercial fertilizer. The results highlight the potential of switchgrass buffers for improving water sustainability of both agricultural and bioenergy production. The value proposition of switchgrass buffers is nevertheless sensitive to future feedstock price. The impact of fertilizer prices change and forgone income on benefit analysis is also presented.},
doi = {10.1002/bbb.1930},
journal = {Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining},
number = 1,
volume = 13,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Fri Aug 31 00:00:00 EDT 2018},
month = {Fri Aug 31 00:00:00 EDT 2018}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1930

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 9 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Progress toward Evaluating the Sustainability of Switchgrass as a Bioenergy Crop using the SWAT Model
journal, January 2010


Biomass Production of ‘Alamo’ Switchgrass in Response to Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Row Spacing
journal, January 2001


The Economics of Dead Zones: Causes, Impacts, Policy Challenges, and a Model of the Gulf of Mexico Hypoxic Zone
journal, January 2014

  • Rabotyagov, S. S.; Kling, C. L.; Gassman, P. W.
  • Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Vol. 8, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/reep/ret024

Incorporating bioenergy into sustainable landscape designs
journal, April 2016

  • Dale, Virginia H.; Kline, Keith L.; Buford, Marilyn A.
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 56
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.038

Large area Hydrologic Modeling and Assessment part i: Model Development
journal, February 1998


Empirical geographic modeling of switchgrass yields in the United States: EMPIRICAL SWITCHGRASS MODELING
journal, September 2010


Biomass production in the Lower Mississippi River Basin: Mitigating associated nutrient and sediment discharge to the Gulf of Mexico
journal, September 2018


Biomass Yield and Nutrient Responses of Switchgrass to Phosphorus Application
journal, January 2012


Multifunctional landscapes: Site characterization and field-scale design to incorporate biomass production into an agricultural system
journal, September 2015


Effects of Agricultural Conservation Practices on N Loads in the Mississippi–Atchafalaya River Basin
journal, January 2014

  • Santhi, C.; Arnold, J. G.; White, M.
  • Journal of Environment Quality, Vol. 43, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.2134/jeq2013.10.0403

Integrating economic costs into conservation planning
journal, December 2006


Regional Effects of Agricultural Conservation Practices on Nutrient Transport in the Upper Mississippi River Basin
journal, June 2016

  • García, Ana María; Alexander, Richard B.; Arnold, Jeffrey G.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 50, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03543

Cost-effective design of agri-environmental payment programs: U.S. experience in theory and practice
journal, May 2008


Land management strategies for improving water quality in biomass production under changing climate
journal, March 2017


Improving water quality in the Chesapeake Bay using payments for ecosystem services for perennial biomass for bioenergy and biofuel production
journal, July 2018


The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions
journal, January 2007


Seasonal variability in net ecosystem carbon dioxide exchange over a young Switchgrass stand
journal, February 2013

  • Wagle, Pradeep; Kakani, Vijaya Gopal
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 6, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12049

Economic competitiveness of ethanol production from cellulosic feedstock in Tennessee
journal, November 2013


A Scenario and Forecast Model for Gulf of Mexico Hypoxic Area and Volume
journal, September 2013

  • Scavia, Donald; Evans, Mary Anne; Obenour, Daniel R.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 47, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1021/es4025035

Multiple ecosystem services provision and biomass logistics management in bioenergy buffers: A state-of-the-art review
journal, June 2017

  • Ferrarini, Andrea; Serra, Paolo; Almagro, María
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 73
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.052

Environmental and economic analysis of using SWAT to simulate the effects of switchgrass production on water quality in an impaired watershed
journal, October 2015

  • Zhou, Xia Vivian; Clark, Christopher D.; Nair, Sujithkumar Surendran
  • Agricultural Water Management, Vol. 160
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.06.018

The economics of growing shrub willow as a bioenergy buffer on agricultural fields: A case study in the Midwest Corn Belt: Shrub Willow Economics
journal, August 2016

  • Ssegane, Herbert; Zumpf, Colleen; Cristina Negri, M.
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 10, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1679

Effectiveness of best management practices in improving water quality in a pasture-dominated watershed
journal, November 2010

  • Chaubey, I.; Chiang, L.; Gitau, M. W.
  • Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol. 65, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.2489/jswc.65.6.424

Environmental and economic assessment of biomass sourcing from extensively cultivated buffer strips along water bodies
journal, March 2016


Switchgrass Yield Response Functions and Profit-Maximizing Nitrogen Rates on Four Landscapes in Tennessee
journal, January 2012

  • Boyer, Christopher N.; Tyler, Donald D.; Roberts, Roland K.
  • Agronomy Journal, Vol. 104, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.2134/agronj2012.0179

Switchgrass Response to Harvest Frequency and Time and Rate of Applied Nitrogen
journal, January 2005

  • Thomason, W. E.; Raun, W. R.; Johnson, G. V.
  • Journal of Plant Nutrition, Vol. 27, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1081/PLN-120038544

Harvest timing and N application rate effects on switchgrass yield, nutrient cycling, and partitioning
journal, March 2017


Least-cost control of agricultural nutrient contributions to the Gulf of Mexico hypoxic zone
journal, September 2010

  • Rabotyagov, Sergey; Campbell, Todd; Jha, Manoj
  • Ecological Applications, Vol. 20, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1890/08-0680.1

Integrated Economic and Environmental Assessment of Cellulosic Biofuel Production in an Agricultural Watershed
journal, February 2017


Cost of areal reduction of gulf hypoxia through agricultural practice
journal, February 2015


How cost-effective are cover crops, wetlands, and two-stage ditches for nitrogen removal in the Mississippi River Basin?
journal, July 2016


Switchgrass for forage and bioenergy: harvest and nitrogen rate effects on biomass yields and nutrient composition
journal, April 2010


Soil nitrogen dynamics in switchgrass seeded to a marginal cropland in South Dakota
journal, August 2017

  • Lai, Liming; Oh Hong, Chang; Kumar, Sandeep
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 10, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12475

Riparian Buffer Strips as a Multifunctional Management Tool in Agricultural Landscapes: Introduction
journal, January 2012

  • Stutter, Marc I.; Chardon, Wim J.; Kronvang, Brian
  • Journal of Environment Quality, Vol. 41, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.2134/jeq2011.0439

Response of “Alamo” switchgrass tissue chemistry and biomass to nitrogen fertilization in West Tennessee, USA
journal, January 2011

  • Garten, Charles T.; Brice, Deanne J.; Castro, Hector F.
  • Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 140, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2010.12.016

Valuing ecosystem services from wetlands restoration in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley
journal, March 2010


Beyond the nutrient strategies: Common ground to accelerate agricultural water quality improvement in the upper Midwest
journal, January 2018


Cost-effective targeting of conservation investments to reduce the northern Gulf of Mexico hypoxic zone
journal, December 2014

  • Rabotyagov, Sergey S.; Campbell, Todd D.; White, Michael
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111, Issue 52
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1405837111

Reducing Nitrogen Export from the Corn Belt to the Gulf of Mexico: Agricultural Strategies for Remediating Hypoxia
journal, October 2014

  • McLellan, Eileen; Robertson, Dale; Schilling, Keith
  • JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 51, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/jawr.12246

Optimizing Spatial Land Management to Balance Water Quality and Economic Returns in a Lake Erie Watershed
journal, March 2018


Nitrogen and Harvest Frequency Effect on Yield and Cost for Four Perennial Grasses
journal, January 2009


Switchgrass, Bermudagrass, Flaccidgrass, and Lovegrass biomass yield response to nitrogen for single and double harvest
journal, January 2011