DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Life‐cycle analysis of integrated biorefineries with co‐production of biofuels and bio‐based chemicals: co‐product handling methods and implications

Abstract

Abstract New integrated biorefinery (IBR) concepts are being investigated to co‐produce hydrocarbon fuels and high‐value bio‐based chemicals to improve the economic viability of IBRs, to enhance biomass resource utilization efficiencies, and to maximize potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions. Unlike fuel‐only biorefineries, IBRs may co‐produce a significant amount of bio‐based chemicals, whose emission implications for specific biorefinery products and the biorefinery as a whole need to be evaluated. We discuss this in principle and apply three sets of co‐product handling methods to conduct life‐cycle analysis (LCA) of modeled IBRs with co‐production of two bioproduct examples – succinic acid and adipic acid – alongside a renewable diesel blendstock fuel product. The LCA results for the specific co‐product handling methods that were examined shed light on potential artifacts of product‐specific LCA with selected co‐product methods. We discuss the advantages and limitations of each method and conclude that (i) a system‐level or ‘black‐box’ LCA allocation method is too simplistic to reflect appropriately the GHG burdens of distinctly different processing trains for fuels and chemicals in the IBR context, and (ii) the displacement method is the only co‐product handling method that accounts fully for the emission effects of both the fuel product and themore » non‐fuel bio‐based co‐products in the IBRs within the context of the existing fuel‐focused GHG regulatory framework. Alternatively, biorefinery system‐level LCA combines benefits of individual products to offer a complete picture. This system‐level LCA approach offers a holistic LCA without somewhat arbitrary decisions either on an allocation basis or by the selection of an evaluation metric based on specific products. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [2];  [2]
  1. Systems Assessment Group, Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory USA
  2. National Bioenergy Center National Renewable Energy Laboratory IL USA
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1441227
Resource Type:
Publisher's Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining Journal Volume: 12 Journal Issue: 5; Journal ID: ISSN 1932-104X
Publisher:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Cai, Hao, Han, Jeongwoo, Wang, Michael, Davis, Ryan, Biddy, Mary, and Tan, Eric. Life‐cycle analysis of integrated biorefineries with co‐production of biofuels and bio‐based chemicals: co‐product handling methods and implications. United Kingdom: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1002/bbb.1893.
Cai, Hao, Han, Jeongwoo, Wang, Michael, Davis, Ryan, Biddy, Mary, & Tan, Eric. Life‐cycle analysis of integrated biorefineries with co‐production of biofuels and bio‐based chemicals: co‐product handling methods and implications. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1893
Cai, Hao, Han, Jeongwoo, Wang, Michael, Davis, Ryan, Biddy, Mary, and Tan, Eric. Tue . "Life‐cycle analysis of integrated biorefineries with co‐production of biofuels and bio‐based chemicals: co‐product handling methods and implications". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1893.
@article{osti_1441227,
title = {Life‐cycle analysis of integrated biorefineries with co‐production of biofuels and bio‐based chemicals: co‐product handling methods and implications},
author = {Cai, Hao and Han, Jeongwoo and Wang, Michael and Davis, Ryan and Biddy, Mary and Tan, Eric},
abstractNote = {Abstract New integrated biorefinery (IBR) concepts are being investigated to co‐produce hydrocarbon fuels and high‐value bio‐based chemicals to improve the economic viability of IBRs, to enhance biomass resource utilization efficiencies, and to maximize potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions. Unlike fuel‐only biorefineries, IBRs may co‐produce a significant amount of bio‐based chemicals, whose emission implications for specific biorefinery products and the biorefinery as a whole need to be evaluated. We discuss this in principle and apply three sets of co‐product handling methods to conduct life‐cycle analysis (LCA) of modeled IBRs with co‐production of two bioproduct examples – succinic acid and adipic acid – alongside a renewable diesel blendstock fuel product. The LCA results for the specific co‐product handling methods that were examined shed light on potential artifacts of product‐specific LCA with selected co‐product methods. We discuss the advantages and limitations of each method and conclude that (i) a system‐level or ‘black‐box’ LCA allocation method is too simplistic to reflect appropriately the GHG burdens of distinctly different processing trains for fuels and chemicals in the IBR context, and (ii) the displacement method is the only co‐product handling method that accounts fully for the emission effects of both the fuel product and the non‐fuel bio‐based co‐products in the IBRs within the context of the existing fuel‐focused GHG regulatory framework. Alternatively, biorefinery system‐level LCA combines benefits of individual products to offer a complete picture. This system‐level LCA approach offers a holistic LCA without somewhat arbitrary decisions either on an allocation basis or by the selection of an evaluation metric based on specific products. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.},
doi = {10.1002/bbb.1893},
journal = {Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining},
number = 5,
volume = 12,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Tue Jun 12 00:00:00 EDT 2018},
month = {Tue Jun 12 00:00:00 EDT 2018}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1893

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 36 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Life-cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of production of bioethanol from sorghum in the United States
journal, January 2013

  • Cai, Hao; Dunn, Jennifer B.; Wang, Zhichao
  • Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-141

Policy Implications of Allocation Methods in the Life Cycle Analysis of Integrated Corn and Corn Stover Ethanol Production
journal, August 2015


Production pathways for renewable jet fuel: a review of commercialization status and future prospects: Renewable jet fuel technologies: commercialisation status and future prospects
journal, April 2016

  • Mawhood, Rebecca; Gazis, Evangelos; de Jong, Sierk
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 10, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1644

Bioreactors for lignocellulose conversion into fermentable sugars for production of high added value products
journal, November 2015

  • Liguori, Rossana; Ventorino, Valeria; Pepe, Olimpia
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Vol. 100, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00253-015-7125-9

Well-to-wheels energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ethanol from corn, sugarcane and cellulosic biomass for US use
journal, December 2012


An assessment of the potential products and economic and environmental impacts resulting from a billion ton bioeconomy
journal, November 2016

  • Rogers, Jonathan N.; Stokes, Bryce; Dunn, Jennifer
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 11, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1728

The Catalytic Valorization of Lignin for the Production of Renewable Chemicals
journal, June 2010

  • Zakzeski, Joseph; Bruijnincx, Pieter C. A.; Jongerius, Anna L.
  • Chemical Reviews, Vol. 110, Issue 6, p. 3552-3599
  • DOI: 10.1021/cr900354u

Cellulosic ethanol: status and innovation
journal, June 2017


Biological production of adipic acid from renewable substrates: Current and future methods
journal, January 2016


Carbon recovery from wastewater through bioconversion into biodegradable polymers
journal, July 2017

  • Valentino, Francesco; Morgan-Sagastume, Fernando; Campanari, Sabrina
  • New Biotechnology, Vol. 37
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2016.05.007

Succinic acid from renewable resources as a C 4 building-block chemical—a review of the catalytic possibilities in aqueous media
journal, January 2009

  • Delhomme, Clara; Weuster-Botz, Dirk; Kühn, Fritz E.
  • Green Chem., Vol. 11, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1039/B810684C

Bio-oil based biorefinery strategy for the production of succinic acid
journal, January 2013

  • Wang, Caixia; Thygesen, Anders; Liu, Yilan
  • Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-74

Review of US and EU initiatives toward development, demonstration, and commercialization of lignocellulosic biofuels
journal, August 2013

  • Balan, Venkatesh; Chiaramonti, David; Kumar, Sandeep
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 7, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1436

Life cycle environmental sustainability of lignocellulosic ethanol produced in integrated thermo-chemical biorefineries
journal, April 2015

  • Jeswani, Harish K.; Falano, Temitope; Azapagic, Adisa
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 9, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1558

Methods of dealing with co-products of biofuels in life-cycle analysis and consequent results within the U.S. context
journal, October 2011


Life-cycle analysis of bio-based aviation fuels
journal, December 2013


A review of current technology for biodiesel production: State of the art
journal, February 2014


Allocation in lca of wood-based products experiences of cost action E9 part i. methodology
journal, September 2002

  • Jungmeier, Gerfried; Werner, Frank; Jarnehammar, Anna
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 7, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF02978890

Chemicals from Biomass: A Market Assessment of Bioproducts with Near-Term Potential
report, March 2016

  • Biddy, Mary J.; Scarlata, Christopher; Kinchin, Christopher
  • DOI: 10.2172/1244312

The Techno-Economic Basis for Coproduct Manufacturing To Enable Hydrocarbon Fuel Production from Lignocellulosic Biomass
journal, May 2016


Identification and thermochemical analysis of high-lignin feedstocks for biofuel and biochemical production
journal, January 2011

  • Mendu, Venugopal; Harman-Ware, Anne E.; Crocker, Mark
  • Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 4, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-4-43

Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emission Intensity of Petroleum Products at U.S. Refineries
journal, June 2014

  • Elgowainy, Amgad; Han, Jeongwoo; Cai, Hao
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 48, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1021/es5010347

Environmental Impacts of Wild Caught Cod and Farmed Salmon - A Comparison with Chicken (7 pp)
journal, January 2006

  • Ellingsen, Harald; Aanondsen, Svein Aanond
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 11, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1065/lca2006.01.236

Life Cycle Carbon Footprint of Ethanol and Potassium Acetate Produced from a Forest Product Wastewater Stream by a Co-Located Biorefinery
journal, July 2014

  • Liu, Jifei; Shonnard, David R.
  • ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, Vol. 2, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1021/sc500256y