DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Quantifying the indirect impacts of climate on agriculture: an inter-method comparison

Abstract

Climate change and increases in CO2 concentration affect the productivity of land, with implications for land use, land cover, and agricultural production. Much of the literature on the effect of climate on agriculture has focused on linking projections of changes in climate to process-based or statistical crop models. However, the changes in productivity have broader economic implications that cannot be quantified in crop models alone. How important are these socio-economic feedbacks to a comprehensive assessment of the impacts of climate change on agriculture? In this paper, we attempt to measure the importance of these interaction effects through an inter-method comparison between process models, statistical models, and integrated assessment model (IAMs). We find the impacts on crop yields vary widely between these three modeling approaches. Yield impacts generated by the IAMs are 20%-40% higher than the yield impacts generated by process-based or statistical crop models, with indirect climate effects adjusting yields by between - 12% and + 15% (e.g. input substitution and crop switching). The remaining effects are due to technological change.

Authors:
 [1];  [2]
  1. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States). Joint Global Change Research Inst.
  2. Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
OSTI Identifier:
1405199
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1422312
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-122866
Journal ID: ISSN 1748-9326
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-76RL01830; SC0005171
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Environmental Research Letters
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Environmental Research Letters Journal Volume: 12 Journal Issue: 11; Journal ID: ISSN 1748-9326
Publisher:
IOP Publishing
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; integrated assessment modeling; climate change; agriculture impacts

Citation Formats

Calvin, Kate, and Fisher-Vanden, Karen. Quantifying the indirect impacts of climate on agriculture: an inter-method comparison. United Kingdom: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa843c.
Calvin, Kate, & Fisher-Vanden, Karen. Quantifying the indirect impacts of climate on agriculture: an inter-method comparison. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa843c
Calvin, Kate, and Fisher-Vanden, Karen. Fri . "Quantifying the indirect impacts of climate on agriculture: an inter-method comparison". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa843c.
@article{osti_1405199,
title = {Quantifying the indirect impacts of climate on agriculture: an inter-method comparison},
author = {Calvin, Kate and Fisher-Vanden, Karen},
abstractNote = {Climate change and increases in CO2 concentration affect the productivity of land, with implications for land use, land cover, and agricultural production. Much of the literature on the effect of climate on agriculture has focused on linking projections of changes in climate to process-based or statistical crop models. However, the changes in productivity have broader economic implications that cannot be quantified in crop models alone. How important are these socio-economic feedbacks to a comprehensive assessment of the impacts of climate change on agriculture? In this paper, we attempt to measure the importance of these interaction effects through an inter-method comparison between process models, statistical models, and integrated assessment model (IAMs). We find the impacts on crop yields vary widely between these three modeling approaches. Yield impacts generated by the IAMs are 20%-40% higher than the yield impacts generated by process-based or statistical crop models, with indirect climate effects adjusting yields by between - 12% and + 15% (e.g. input substitution and crop switching). The remaining effects are due to technological change.},
doi = {10.1088/1748-9326/aa843c},
journal = {Environmental Research Letters},
number = 11,
volume = 12,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Fri Oct 27 00:00:00 EDT 2017},
month = {Fri Oct 27 00:00:00 EDT 2017}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa843c

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 14 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison
journal, December 2013

  • Rosenzweig, Cynthia; Elliott, Joshua; Deryng, Delphine
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1222463110

Projecting future crop productivity for global economic modeling
journal, December 2013

  • Müller, Christoph; Robertson, Richard D.
  • Agricultural Economics, Vol. 45, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/agec.12088

Economic and Physical Modeling of land use in gcam 3.0 and an Application to Agricultural Productivity, Land, and Terrestrial Carbon
journal, May 2014


Integrated Assessment Models of Global Climate Change
journal, November 1997


Works referencing / citing this record:

Synthesis and Review: an inter-method comparison of climate change impacts on agriculture
journal, June 2018

  • Ciscar, Juan-Carlos; Fisher-Vanden, Karen; Lobell, David B.
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aac7cb

Toward sustainable climate change adaptation
journal, January 2020

  • Yang, Yi; Liu, Beibei; Wang, Peng
  • Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 24, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12984

GCAM v5.1: representing the linkages between energy, water, land, climate, and economic systems
journal, January 2019

  • Calvin, Katherine; Patel, Pralit; Clarke, Leon
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-12-677-2019