DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Geologic carbon sequestration injection wells in overpressured storage reservoirs: estimating area of review

Abstract

Abstract The Area of Review (AoR) under the US Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Class VI CO 2 injection permit is defined as the region surrounding the geologic carbon sequestration (GCS) project where underground sources of drinking water (USDWs) may be endangered. Estimation of the AoR is based on the calculated reservoir pressurization due to CO 2 injection and the associated potential to lift saline water into potable groundwater aquifers through open flow paths (e.g. wells) assuming the system is hydrostatic. In cases where the storage reservoirs are not initially hydrostatic, and in particular where they are overpressured, AoR estimation methods need to be altered. In this paper, we present and apply an approach to evaluating potential endangerment of USDW based on comparing brine leakage through a hypothetical open flow path in a no‐injection scenario and brine leakage in a CO 2 ‐injection scenario. We present six possible ways to normalize injection‐related leakage relative to no‐injection leakage. We calculate leakage using semi‐analytical solutions for single‐phase flow and model reservoir pressurization and flow up (single) leaky wells located progressively farther from the injection well. For an example case of relative overpressure and using an injection‐rate‐based approach, results show 50‒60% larger open‐well‐leakage ratesmore » for wells located at 2 km and 10% increase for wells located at 10 km from the injection well relative to the no‐injection case. If total brine leakage is considered, the results depend strongly on the assumed pre‐injection to post‐injection time frames and on the methods of normalization used to calculate incremental leakage. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [2]
  1. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
  2. Montana State Univ., Bozeman, MT (United States). Big Sky Carbon Sequestration Partnership
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Fossil Energy (FE)
OSTI Identifier:
1474985
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1400985
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-05CH11231; DE‐AC02‐05CH11231
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 6; Journal Issue: 6; Journal ID: ISSN 2152-3878
Publisher:
Society of Chemical Industry, Wiley
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
58 GEOSCIENCES; 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; Class VI; overpressured reservoirs; non‐hydrostatic; USDW endangerment

Citation Formats

Oldenburg, Curtis M., Cihan, Abdullah, Zhou, Quanlin, Fairweather, Stacey, and Spangler, Lee H. Geologic carbon sequestration injection wells in overpressured storage reservoirs: estimating area of review. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1002/ghg.1607.
Oldenburg, Curtis M., Cihan, Abdullah, Zhou, Quanlin, Fairweather, Stacey, & Spangler, Lee H. Geologic carbon sequestration injection wells in overpressured storage reservoirs: estimating area of review. United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1607
Oldenburg, Curtis M., Cihan, Abdullah, Zhou, Quanlin, Fairweather, Stacey, and Spangler, Lee H. Wed . "Geologic carbon sequestration injection wells in overpressured storage reservoirs: estimating area of review". United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1607. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1474985.
@article{osti_1474985,
title = {Geologic carbon sequestration injection wells in overpressured storage reservoirs: estimating area of review},
author = {Oldenburg, Curtis M. and Cihan, Abdullah and Zhou, Quanlin and Fairweather, Stacey and Spangler, Lee H.},
abstractNote = {Abstract The Area of Review (AoR) under the US Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Class VI CO 2 injection permit is defined as the region surrounding the geologic carbon sequestration (GCS) project where underground sources of drinking water (USDWs) may be endangered. Estimation of the AoR is based on the calculated reservoir pressurization due to CO 2 injection and the associated potential to lift saline water into potable groundwater aquifers through open flow paths (e.g. wells) assuming the system is hydrostatic. In cases where the storage reservoirs are not initially hydrostatic, and in particular where they are overpressured, AoR estimation methods need to be altered. In this paper, we present and apply an approach to evaluating potential endangerment of USDW based on comparing brine leakage through a hypothetical open flow path in a no‐injection scenario and brine leakage in a CO 2 ‐injection scenario. We present six possible ways to normalize injection‐related leakage relative to no‐injection leakage. We calculate leakage using semi‐analytical solutions for single‐phase flow and model reservoir pressurization and flow up (single) leaky wells located progressively farther from the injection well. For an example case of relative overpressure and using an injection‐rate‐based approach, results show 50‒60% larger open‐well‐leakage rates for wells located at 2 km and 10% increase for wells located at 10 km from the injection well relative to the no‐injection case. If total brine leakage is considered, the results depend strongly on the assumed pre‐injection to post‐injection time frames and on the methods of normalization used to calculate incremental leakage. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd},
doi = {10.1002/ghg.1607},
journal = {Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology},
number = 6,
volume = 6,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Jun 29 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Wed Jun 29 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 5 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Brine flow up a well caused by pressure perturbation from geologic carbon sequestration: Static and dynamic evaluations
journal, July 2011

  • Birkholzer, Jens T.; Nicot, Jean Philippe; Oldenburg, Curtis M.
  • International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 5, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.01.003

Possible effects of erosional changes of the topographic relief on pore pressures at depth
journal, December 1983


Evaluation of large-scale CO2 storage on fresh-water sections of aquifers: An example from the Texas Gulf Coast Basin
journal, October 2008


Algorithm 368: Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms [D5]
journal, January 1970


Pressure perturbations from geologic carbon sequestration: Area-of-review boundaries and borehole leakage driving forces
journal, February 2009


A tiered area-of-review framework for geologic carbon sequestration: Perspective: A tiered area-of-review framework for geologic carbon sequestration
journal, December 2013

  • Birkholzer, Jens; Cihan, Abdullah; Bandilla, Karl
  • Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Vol. 4, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/ghg.1393

Buoyancy Effects on Upward Brine Displacement Caused by CO2 Injection
journal, December 2010


Active CO2 reservoir management for carbon storage: Analysis of operational strategies to relieve pressure buildup and improve injectivity
journal, January 2012

  • Buscheck, Thomas A.; Sun, Yunwei; Chen, Mingjie
  • International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 6
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.11.007

Remark on algorithm 368: Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms
journal, October 1970


Delineating Area of Review in a System with Pre-injection Relative Overpressure
journal, January 2014


On the Maintenance of Anomalous Fluid Pressures: I. Thick Sedimentary Sequences
journal, January 1968


Pressure Buildup and Brine Migration During CO 2 Storage in Multilayered Aquifers
journal, August 2012