DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Scenario analysis for techno-economic model development of U.S. offshore wind support structures

Abstract

Abstract Challenging bathymetry and soil conditions of future US offshore wind power plants might promote the use of multimember, fixed‐bottom structures (or ‘jackets’) in place of monopiles. Support structures affect costs associated with the balance of system and operation and maintenance. Understanding the link between these costs and the main environmental design drivers is crucial in the quest for a lower levelized cost of energy, and it is the main rationale for this work. Actual cost and engineering data are still scarce; hence, we evaluated a simplified engineering approach to tie key site and turbine parameters (e.g. water depth, wave height, tower‐head mass, hub height and generator rating) to the overall support weight. A jacket‐and‐tower sizing tool, part of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's system engineering software suite, was utilized to achieve mass‐optimized support structures for 81 different configurations. This tool set provides preliminary sizing of all jacket components. Results showed reasonable agreement with the available industry data, and that the jacket mass is mainly driven by water depth, but hub height and tower‐head mass become more influential at greater turbine ratings. A larger sensitivity of the structural mass to wave height and target eigenfrequency was observed for the deepestmore » water conditions (>40 m). Thus, techno‐economic analyses using this model should be based on accurate estimates of actual metocean conditions and turbine parameters especially for deep waters. The relationships derived from this study will inform National Renewable Energy Laboratory's offshore balance of system cost model, and they will be used to evaluate the impact of changes in technology on offshore wind lower levelized cost of energy. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.« less

Authors:
 [1]; ORCiD logo [2];  [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
  2. Brigham Young Univ., Provo, UT (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Wind and Water Technologies Office (EE-4W)
OSTI Identifier:
1348156
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1400795
Report Number(s):
NREL/JA-5000-66252
Journal ID: ISSN 1095-4244
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC36-08GO28308; 36-08GO28308
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Wind Energy
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 20; Journal Issue: 4; Journal ID: ISSN 1095-4244
Publisher:
Wiley
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
17 WIND ENERGY; offshore wind; jacket substructure; mass sensitivity to environmental variables; balance of system; cost analysis

Citation Formats

Damiani, Rick, Ning, Andrew, Maples, Ben, Smith, Aaron, and Dykes, Katherine. Scenario analysis for techno-economic model development of U.S. offshore wind support structures. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1002/we.2021.
Damiani, Rick, Ning, Andrew, Maples, Ben, Smith, Aaron, & Dykes, Katherine. Scenario analysis for techno-economic model development of U.S. offshore wind support structures. United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2021
Damiani, Rick, Ning, Andrew, Maples, Ben, Smith, Aaron, and Dykes, Katherine. Thu . "Scenario analysis for techno-economic model development of U.S. offshore wind support structures". United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2021. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1348156.
@article{osti_1348156,
title = {Scenario analysis for techno-economic model development of U.S. offshore wind support structures},
author = {Damiani, Rick and Ning, Andrew and Maples, Ben and Smith, Aaron and Dykes, Katherine},
abstractNote = {Abstract Challenging bathymetry and soil conditions of future US offshore wind power plants might promote the use of multimember, fixed‐bottom structures (or ‘jackets’) in place of monopiles. Support structures affect costs associated with the balance of system and operation and maintenance. Understanding the link between these costs and the main environmental design drivers is crucial in the quest for a lower levelized cost of energy, and it is the main rationale for this work. Actual cost and engineering data are still scarce; hence, we evaluated a simplified engineering approach to tie key site and turbine parameters (e.g. water depth, wave height, tower‐head mass, hub height and generator rating) to the overall support weight. A jacket‐and‐tower sizing tool, part of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's system engineering software suite, was utilized to achieve mass‐optimized support structures for 81 different configurations. This tool set provides preliminary sizing of all jacket components. Results showed reasonable agreement with the available industry data, and that the jacket mass is mainly driven by water depth, but hub height and tower‐head mass become more influential at greater turbine ratings. A larger sensitivity of the structural mass to wave height and target eigenfrequency was observed for the deepest water conditions (>40 m). Thus, techno‐economic analyses using this model should be based on accurate estimates of actual metocean conditions and turbine parameters especially for deep waters. The relationships derived from this study will inform National Renewable Energy Laboratory's offshore balance of system cost model, and they will be used to evaluate the impact of changes in technology on offshore wind lower levelized cost of energy. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.},
doi = {10.1002/we.2021},
journal = {Wind Energy},
number = 4,
volume = 20,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Sep 22 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Thu Sep 22 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 6 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

SNOPT: An SQP Algorithm for Large-Scale Constrained Optimization
journal, January 2005


Energy From Offshore Wind
conference, April 2013

  • Musial, W.; Butterfield, S.; Ram, B.
  • Offshore Technology Conference
  • DOI: 10.4043/18355-MS

A Direct Search Optimization Method That Models the Objective and Constraint Functions by Linear Interpolation
book, January 1994


Design Drivers for Offshore Wind Turbine Jacket Support Structures
conference, October 2011

  • Cordle, Andrew; McCann, Graeme; de Vries, Wybren
  • ASME 2011 30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Volume 5: Ocean Space Utilization; Ocean Renewable Energy
  • DOI: 10.1115/OMAE2011-49338

Multi-criteria assessment of offshore wind turbine support structures
journal, November 2011


A Jacket Sizing Tool for Offshore Wind Turbines Within the Systems Engineering Initiative
conference, May 2013

  • Damiani, Rick; Song, Huimin
  • Offshore Technology Conference
  • DOI: 10.4043/24140-MS

Gust Response Factor Methodology for Wind Turbine Tower Assemblies
journal, January 2007


2013 Cost of Wind Energy Review
report, February 2015


Sensitivity Analysis of Wind Plant Performance to Key Turbine Design Parameters: A Systems Engineering Approach
conference, January 2014

  • Dykes, Katherine; Ning, Andrew; King, Ryan
  • 32nd ASME Wind Energy Symposium
  • DOI: 10.2514/6.2014-1087

Offshore Wind Energy Cost Modeling: Installation and Decommissioning
book, January 2012


ADS Experiments for the Effectiveness of External Source
book, January 2012


Comparison of different approaches to load calculation for the OWEC Quattropod jacket support structure
journal, December 2014


Simulation-based optimization of lattice support structures for offshore wind energy converters with the simultaneous perturbation algorithm
journal, December 2014


Aseismic pile foundation design analysis
journal, March 1993


Ocean Environment
book, January 2005


Works referencing / citing this record:

Structural optimization with several discrete design variables per part by outer approximation
journal, April 2018

  • Stolpe, Mathias; Sandal, Kasper
  • Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 57, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00158-018-1941-3

Conceptual jacket design by structural optimization
journal, September 2018

  • Sandal, Kasper; Verbart, Alexander; Stolpe, Mathias
  • Wind Energy, Vol. 21, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1002/we.2264

A systematic approach to offshore wind turbine jacket predesign and optimization: geometry, cost, and surrogate structural code check models
journal, January 2018

  • Häfele, Jan; Damiani, Rick R.; King, Ryan N.
  • Wind Energy Science, Vol. 3, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/wes-3-553-2018

A systematic approach to offshore wind turbine jacket predesign and optimization: geometry, cost, and surrogate structural code check models
other, January 2018

  • Häfele, Jan; Damiani, Rick R.; King, Ryan N.
  • Oldenburg : European Academy of Wind Energy (EAWE)
  • DOI: 10.15488/4112