DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: What are the effects of Agro-Ecological Zones and land use region boundaries on land resource projection using the Global Change Assessment Model?

Abstract

Understanding potential impacts of climate change is complicated by spatially mismatched land representations between gridded datasets and models, and land use models with larger regions defined by geopolitical and/or biophysical criteria. Here in this study, we quantify the sensitivity of Global Change Assessment Model (GCAM) outputs to the delineation of Agro-Ecological Zones (AEZs), which are normally based on historical (1961–1990) climate. We reconstruct GCAM's land regions using projected (2071–2100) climate, and find large differences in estimated future land use that correspond with differences in agricultural commodity prices and production volumes. Importantly, historically delineated AEZs experience spatially heterogeneous climate impacts over time, and do not necessarily provide more homogenous initial land productivity than projected AEZs. Finally, we conclude that non-climatic criteria for land use region delineation are likely preferable for modeling land use change in the context of climate change, and that uncertainty associated with land delineation needs to be quantified.

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [3]
  1. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States). Climate and Ecosystems Sciences Division
  2. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States). Joint Global Change Research Institute
  3. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States). Climate and Ecosystems Sciences Division; Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA (United States). Berkeley Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
OSTI Identifier:
1439208
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1396547
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-05CH11231
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Environmental Modelling and Software
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 85; Journal Issue: C; Related Information: © 2016 Elsevier Ltd; Journal ID: ISSN 1364-8152
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; 58 GEOSCIENCES; AEZ; Agro-ecological zone; Climate change; GCAM; Integrated assessment model; Land use; Scale

Citation Formats

Di Vittorio, Alan V., Kyle, Page, and Collins, William D. What are the effects of Agro-Ecological Zones and land use region boundaries on land resource projection using the Global Change Assessment Model?. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.08.016.
Di Vittorio, Alan V., Kyle, Page, & Collins, William D. What are the effects of Agro-Ecological Zones and land use region boundaries on land resource projection using the Global Change Assessment Model?. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.08.016
Di Vittorio, Alan V., Kyle, Page, and Collins, William D. Sat . "What are the effects of Agro-Ecological Zones and land use region boundaries on land resource projection using the Global Change Assessment Model?". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.08.016. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1439208.
@article{osti_1439208,
title = {What are the effects of Agro-Ecological Zones and land use region boundaries on land resource projection using the Global Change Assessment Model?},
author = {Di Vittorio, Alan V. and Kyle, Page and Collins, William D.},
abstractNote = {Understanding potential impacts of climate change is complicated by spatially mismatched land representations between gridded datasets and models, and land use models with larger regions defined by geopolitical and/or biophysical criteria. Here in this study, we quantify the sensitivity of Global Change Assessment Model (GCAM) outputs to the delineation of Agro-Ecological Zones (AEZs), which are normally based on historical (1961–1990) climate. We reconstruct GCAM's land regions using projected (2071–2100) climate, and find large differences in estimated future land use that correspond with differences in agricultural commodity prices and production volumes. Importantly, historically delineated AEZs experience spatially heterogeneous climate impacts over time, and do not necessarily provide more homogenous initial land productivity than projected AEZs. Finally, we conclude that non-climatic criteria for land use region delineation are likely preferable for modeling land use change in the context of climate change, and that uncertainty associated with land delineation needs to be quantified.},
doi = {10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.08.016},
journal = {Environmental Modelling and Software},
number = C,
volume = 85,
place = {United States},
year = {Sat Sep 03 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Sat Sep 03 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}

Journal Article:

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 12 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

The geography of climate change: implications for conservation biogeography: Geography of climate change
journal, April 2010


Adjustment of global gridded precipitation for systematic bias: GLOBAL GRIDDED PRECIPITATION
journal, May 2003

  • Adam, Jennifer C.; Lettenmaier, Dennis P.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 108, Issue D9
  • DOI: 10.1029/2002JD002499

Climate change impacts on US agriculture and forestry: benefits of global climate stabilization
journal, September 2015


Opportunities to improve impact, integration, and evaluation of land change models
journal, October 2013

  • Brown, Daniel G.; Verburg, Peter H.; Pontius, Robert Gilmore
  • Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Vol. 5, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.012

Implications of simultaneously mitigating and adapting to climate change: initial experiments using GCAM
journal, December 2012


Reducing the impact of model scale on simulated, gridded switchgrass yields
journal, January 2014


Forecasting technological change in agriculture—An endogenous implementation in a global land use model
journal, January 2014

  • Dietrich, Jan Philipp; Schmitz, Christoph; Lotze-Campen, Hermann
  • Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 81
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.02.003

The climate velocity of the contiguous United States during the 20th century
journal, October 2012

  • Dobrowski, Solomon Z.; Abatzoglou, John; Swanson, Alan K.
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 19, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12026

Socio-economic and climate change impacts on agriculture: an integrated assessment, 1990–2080
journal, October 2005

  • Fischer, Günther; Shah, Mahendra; N. Tubiello, Francesco
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 360, Issue 1463
  • DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1744

Crop Productivity and the Global Livestock Sector: Implications for Land Use Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
journal, December 2012

  • Havlik, P.; Valin, H.; Mosnier, A.
  • American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 95, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/ajae/aas085

Scenarios for the risk of hunger in the twenty-first century using Shared Socioeconomic Pathways
journal, January 2015


Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas
journal, January 2005

  • Hijmans, Robert J.; Cameron, Susan E.; Parra, Juan L.
  • International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 25, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1002/joc.1276

Greenhouse Gas Policy Influences Climate via Direct Effects of Land-Use Change
journal, June 2013


Potential influence of climate-induced vegetation shifts on future land use and associated land carbon fluxes in Northern Eurasia
journal, March 2014


Long-term dynamic modeling of global population and built-up area in a spatially explicit way: HYDE 3.1
journal, March 2010


Meeting the radiative forcing targets of the representative concentration pathways in a world with agricultural climate impacts: KYLE ET AL.
journal, February 2014

  • Kyle, Page; Müller, Christoph; Calvin, Katherine
  • Earth's Future, Vol. 2, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013EF000199

The global carbon budget 1959–2011
journal, January 2013


The velocity of climate change
journal, December 2009

  • Loarie, Scott R.; Duffy, Philip B.; Hamilton, Healy
  • Nature, Vol. 462, Issue 7276
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature08649

An emission pathway for stabilization at 6 Wm−2 radiative forcing
journal, August 2011


Climate model based consensus on the hydrologic impacts of climate change to the Rio Lempa basin of Central America
journal, January 2009

  • Maurer, E. P.; Adam, J. C.; Wood, A. W.
  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 13, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/hess-13-183-2009

Climate change projections of the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP)
journal, July 2013


Farming the planet: 2. Geographic distribution of crop areas, yields, physiological types, and net primary production in the year 2000: GLOBAL CROP AREAS AND YIELDS IN 2000
journal, March 2008

  • Monfreda, Chad; Ramankutty, Navin; Foley, Jonathan A.
  • Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Vol. 22, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007GB002947

The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment
journal, February 2010

  • Moss, Richard H.; Edmonds, Jae A.; Hibbard, Kathy A.
  • Nature, Vol. 463, Issue 7282
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature08823

Projecting future crop productivity for global economic modeling
journal, December 2013

  • Müller, Christoph; Robertson, Richard D.
  • Agricultural Economics, Vol. 45, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/agec.12088

Estimating historical changes in global land cover: Croplands from 1700 to 1992
journal, December 1999

  • Ramankutty, Navin; Foley, Jonathan A.
  • Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Vol. 13, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1029/1999GB900046

Farming the planet: 1. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000: GLOBAL AGRICULTURAL LANDS IN 2000
journal, January 2008

  • Ramankutty, Navin; Evan, Amato T.; Monfreda, Chad
  • Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Vol. 22, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007GB002952

Using Land To Mitigate Climate Change: Hitting the Target, Recognizing the Trade-offs
journal, May 2012

  • Reilly, John; Melillo, Jerry; Cai, Yongxia
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 46, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1021/es2034729

RCP 8.5—A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions
journal, August 2011


Regional CO 2 and latent heat surface fluxes in the Southern Great Plains: Measurements, modeling, and scaling
journal, January 2009

  • Riley, W. J.; Biraud, S. C.; Torn, M. S.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 114, Issue G4
  • DOI: 10.1029/2009JG001003

Land-use change trajectories up to 2050: insights from a global agro-economic model comparison
journal, December 2013

  • Schmitz, Christoph; van Meijl, Hans; Kyle, Page
  • Agricultural Economics, Vol. 45, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/agec.12090

A reassessment of global bioenergy potential in 2050
journal, February 2014


Using dynamic vegetation models to simulate plant range shifts
journal, March 2014

  • Snell, R. S.; Huth, A.; Nabel, J. E. M. S.
  • Ecography, Vol. 37, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1111/ecog.00580

Forest Management, Conservation, and Global Timber Markets
journal, February 1999

  • Sohngen, Brent; Mendelsohn, Robert; Sedjo, Roger
  • American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 81, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.2307/1244446

An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design
journal, April 2012

  • Taylor, Karl E.; Stouffer, Ronald J.; Meehl, Gerald A.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 93, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1

RCP4.5: a pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by 2100
journal, July 2011

  • Thomson, Allison M.; Calvin, Katherine V.; Smith, Steven J.
  • Climatic Change, Vol. 109, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10584-011-0151-4

The representative concentration pathways: an overview
journal, August 2011


RCP2.6: exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2°C
journal, August 2011

  • van Vuuren, Detlef P.; Stehfest, Elke; den Elzen, Michel G. J.
  • Climatic Change, Vol. 109, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10584-011-0152-3

A new scenario framework for Climate Change Research: scenario matrix architecture
journal, October 2013

  • van Vuuren, Detlef P.; Kriegler, Elmar; O’Neill, Brian C.
  • Climatic Change, Vol. 122, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10584-013-0906-1

Land system change and food security: towards multi-scale land system solutions
journal, October 2013

  • Verburg, Peter H.; Mertz, Ole; Erb, Karl-Heinz
  • Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Vol. 5, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.003

Why do global long-term scenarios for agriculture differ? An overview of the AgMIP Global Economic Model Intercomparison
journal, December 2013

  • von Lampe, Martin; Willenbockel, Dirk; Ahammad, Helal
  • Agricultural Economics, Vol. 45, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/agec.12086

Comparing the influence of net and gross anthropogenic land-use and land-cover changes on the carbon cycle in the MPI-ESM
journal, January 2014


Works referencing / citing this record:

Issues with Large Area Thematic Accuracy Assessment for Mapping Cropland Extent: A Tale of Three Continents
journal, December 2017

  • Yadav, Kamini; Congalton, Russell
  • Remote Sensing, Vol. 10, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3390/rs10010053

GCAM v5.1: representing the linkages between energy, water, land, climate, and economic systems
journal, January 2019

  • Calvin, Katherine; Patel, Pralit; Clarke, Leon
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-12-677-2019

Current challenges of implementing anthropogenic land-use and land-cover change in models contributing to climate change assessments
journal, January 2017

  • Prestele, Reinhard; Arneth, Almut; Bondeau, Alberte
  • Earth System Dynamics, Vol. 8, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/esd-8-369-2017

Modelling feedbacks between human and natural processes in the land system
journal, January 2018

  • Robinson, Derek T.; Di Vittorio, Alan; Alexander, Peter
  • Earth System Dynamics, Vol. 9, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/esd-9-895-2018

Impact of Farmland Change on Soybean Production Potential in Recent 40 Years: A Case Study in Western Jilin, China
journal, July 2018

  • Pu, Luoman; Zhang, Shuwen; Li, Fei
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 15, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15071522

Downscaling of national crop area statistics using drivers of cropland productivity measured at fine resolutions
journal, October 2018