The impact of shale gas on the cost and feasibility of meeting climate targets—A global energy system model analysis and an exploration of uncertainties
Abstract
There exists considerable uncertainty over both shale and conventional gas resource availability and extraction costs, as well as the fugitive methane emissions associated with shale gas extraction and its possible role in mitigating climate change. This study uses a multi-region energy system model, TIAM (TIMES integrated assessment model), to consider the impact of a range of conventional and shale gas cost and availability assessments on mitigation scenarios aimed at achieving a limit to global warming of below 2 °C in 2100, with a 50% likelihood. When adding shale gas to the global energy mix, the reduction to the global energy system cost is relatively small (up to 0.4%), and the mitigation cost increases by 1%–3% under all cost assumptions. The impact of a “dash for shale gas”, of unavailability of carbon capture and storage, of increased barriers to investment in low carbon technologies, and of higher than expected leakage rates, are also considered; and are each found to have the potential to increase the cost and reduce feasibility of meeting global temperature goals. Finally, we conclude that the extraction of shale gas is not likely to significantly reduce the effort required to mitigate climate change under globally coordinated action, butmore »
- Authors:
-
- Imperial College London, London (United Kingdom)
- Met Office Hadley Centre, Devon (United Kingdom)
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Imperial College London, London (United Kingdom)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE Office of Science (SC)
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1358443
- Grant/Contract Number:
- SC0009988
- Resource Type:
- Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Name:
- Energies
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Volume: 10; Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 1996-1073
- Publisher:
- MDPI AG
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 04 OIL SHALES AND TAR SANDS; shale gas; natural gas; supply curves; climate change mitigation; energy system analysis; energy scenarios; TIMES Integrated AssessmentModel (TIAM); fugitive methane emissions; energy economics
Citation Formats
Few, Sheridan, Gambhir, Ajay, Napp, Tamaryn, Hawkes, Adam, Mangeon, Stephane, Bernie, Dan, and Lowe, Jason. The impact of shale gas on the cost and feasibility of meeting climate targets—A global energy system model analysis and an exploration of uncertainties. United States: N. p., 2017.
Web. doi:10.3390/en10020158.
Few, Sheridan, Gambhir, Ajay, Napp, Tamaryn, Hawkes, Adam, Mangeon, Stephane, Bernie, Dan, & Lowe, Jason. The impact of shale gas on the cost and feasibility of meeting climate targets—A global energy system model analysis and an exploration of uncertainties. United States. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10020158
Few, Sheridan, Gambhir, Ajay, Napp, Tamaryn, Hawkes, Adam, Mangeon, Stephane, Bernie, Dan, and Lowe, Jason. Fri .
"The impact of shale gas on the cost and feasibility of meeting climate targets—A global energy system model analysis and an exploration of uncertainties". United States. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10020158. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1358443.
@article{osti_1358443,
title = {The impact of shale gas on the cost and feasibility of meeting climate targets—A global energy system model analysis and an exploration of uncertainties},
author = {Few, Sheridan and Gambhir, Ajay and Napp, Tamaryn and Hawkes, Adam and Mangeon, Stephane and Bernie, Dan and Lowe, Jason},
abstractNote = {There exists considerable uncertainty over both shale and conventional gas resource availability and extraction costs, as well as the fugitive methane emissions associated with shale gas extraction and its possible role in mitigating climate change. This study uses a multi-region energy system model, TIAM (TIMES integrated assessment model), to consider the impact of a range of conventional and shale gas cost and availability assessments on mitigation scenarios aimed at achieving a limit to global warming of below 2 °C in 2100, with a 50% likelihood. When adding shale gas to the global energy mix, the reduction to the global energy system cost is relatively small (up to 0.4%), and the mitigation cost increases by 1%–3% under all cost assumptions. The impact of a “dash for shale gas”, of unavailability of carbon capture and storage, of increased barriers to investment in low carbon technologies, and of higher than expected leakage rates, are also considered; and are each found to have the potential to increase the cost and reduce feasibility of meeting global temperature goals. Finally, we conclude that the extraction of shale gas is not likely to significantly reduce the effort required to mitigate climate change under globally coordinated action, but could increase required mitigation effort if not handled sufficiently carefully.},
doi = {10.3390/en10020158},
journal = {Energies},
number = 2,
volume = 10,
place = {United States},
year = {Fri Jan 27 00:00:00 EST 2017},
month = {Fri Jan 27 00:00:00 EST 2017}
}
Web of Science
Works referenced in this record:
Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States
journal, November 2013
- Miller, S. M.; Wofsy, S. C.; Michalak, A. M.
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 110, Issue 50
Deterministic and stochastic analysis of alternative climate targets under differentiated cooperation regimes
journal, December 2009
- Loulou, Richard; Labriet, Maryse; Kanudia, Amit
- Energy Economics, Vol. 31
Information Collection, Access, and Dissemination to Support Evidence-Based Shale Gas Policies
journal, November 2014
- Gamper-Rabindran, Shanti
- Energy Technology, Vol. 2, Issue 12
International climate policy architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios
journal, December 2009
- Clarke, Leon; Edmonds, Jae; Krey, Volker
- Energy Economics, Vol. 31
Unconventional gas – A review of regional and global resource estimates
journal, June 2013
- McGlade, Christophe; Speirs, Jamie; Sorrell, Steve
- Energy, Vol. 55
Toward a better understanding and quantification of methane emissions from shale gas development
journal, April 2014
- Caulton, D. R.; Shepson, P. B.; Santoro, R. L.
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111, Issue 17
Drivers of the US CO2 emissions 1997–2013
journal, July 2015
- Feng, Kuishuang; Davis, Steven J.; Sun, Laixiang
- Nature Communications, Vol. 6, Issue 1
Reconciling divergent estimates of oil and gas methane emissions
journal, December 2015
- Zavala-Araiza, Daniel; Lyon, David R.; Alvarez, Ramón A.
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
University of Texas study underestimates national methane emissions at natural gas production sites due to instrument sensor failure
journal, August 2015
- Howard, Touché
- Energy Science & Engineering, Vol. 3, Issue 5
Energy systems modeling for twenty-first century energy challenges
journal, May 2014
- Pfenninger, Stefan; Hawkes, Adam; Keirstead, James
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 33
The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C
journal, January 2015
- McGlade, Christophe; Ekins, Paul
- Nature, Vol. 517, Issue 7533
Boom or bust? Mapping out the known unknowns of global shale gas production potential
journal, May 2015
- Hilaire, Jérôme; Bauer, Nico; Brecha, Robert J.
- Energy Economics, Vol. 49
Methane Emissions from Conventional and Unconventional Natural Gas Production Sites in the Marcellus Shale Basin
journal, January 2016
- Omara, Mark; Sullivan, Melissa R.; Li, Xiang
- Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 50, Issue 4
Aircraft-Based Measurements of Point Source Methane Emissions in the Barnett Shale Basin
journal, June 2015
- Lavoie, Tegan N.; Shepson, Paul B.; Cambaliza, Maria O. L.
- Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 13
Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure
journal, April 2012
- Alvarez, R. A.; Pacala, S. W.; Winebrake, J. J.
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 109, Issue 17
The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies
journal, January 2014
- Kriegler, Elmar; Weyant, John P.; Blanford, Geoffrey J.
- Climatic Change, Vol. 123, Issue 3-4
Exploring the uncertainty around potential shale gas development – A global energy system analysis based on TIAM (TIMES Integrated Assessment Model)
journal, August 2013
- Gracceva, Francesco; Zeniewski, Peter
- Energy, Vol. 57
Well economics across ten tiers in low and high Btu (British thermal unit) areas, Barnett Shale, Texas
journal, October 2013
- Gülen, Gürcan; Browning, John; Ikonnikova, Svetlana
- Energy, Vol. 60
The Influence of Shale Gas on U.S. Energy and Environmental Policy
journal, January 2012
- Jacoby, Henry D.; O'Sullivan, Francis M.; Paltsev, Sergey
- Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, Vol. 1, Issue 1
Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations: A letter
journal, April 2011
- Howarth, Robert W.; Santoro, Renee; Ingraffea, Anthony
- Climatic Change, Vol. 106, Issue 4
Methods of estimating shale gas resources – Comparison, evaluation and implications
journal, September 2013
- McGlade, Christophe; Speirs, Jamie; Sorrell, Steve
- Energy, Vol. 59
A reality check on the shale revolution
journal, February 2013
- Hughes, J. David
- Nature, Vol. 494, Issue 7437
Limited impact on decadal-scale climate change from increased use of natural gas
journal, October 2014
- McJeon, Haewon; Edmonds, Jae; Bauer, Nico
- Nature, Vol. 514, Issue 7523
Quantifying atmospheric methane emissions from the Haynesville, Fayetteville, and northeastern Marcellus shale gas production regions: CH4 emissions from shale gas production
journal, March 2015
- Peischl, J.; Ryerson, T. B.; Aikin, K. C.
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 120, Issue 5
Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change?
journal, November 2015
- Fawcett, A. A.; Iyer, G. C.; Clarke, L. E.
- Science, Vol. 350, Issue 6265
ETSAP-TIAM: the TIMES integrated assessment model Part I: Model structure
journal, February 2007
- Loulou, Richard; Labriet, Maryse
- Computational Management Science, Vol. 5, Issue 1-2
An Assessment of World Hydrocarbon Resources
journal, November 1997
- Rogner, H-H.
- Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, Vol. 22, Issue 1
Response to Comment on “Methane Emissions from Process Equipment at Natural Gas Production Sites in the United States: Pneumatic Controllers”
journal, February 2015
- Allen, David T.; Sullivan, David W.; Harrison, Matt
- Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 6
Methane emissions estimate from airborne measurements over a western United States natural gas field: CH
journal, August 2013
- Karion, Anna; Sweeney, Colm; Pétron, Gabrielle
- Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 40, Issue 16
A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways
journal, October 2013
- O’Neill, Brian C.; Kriegler, Elmar; Riahi, Keywan
- Climatic Change, Vol. 122, Issue 3
Shale gas production: potential versus actual greenhouse gas emissions
journal, November 2012
- O’Sullivan, Francis; Paltsev, Sergey
- Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 7, Issue 4
Modeling the Relative GHG Emissions of Conventional and Shale Gas Production
journal, December 2011
- Stephenson, Trevor; Valle, Jose Eduardo; Riera-Palou, Xavier
- Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 45, Issue 24
Sensor transition failure in the high flow sampler: Implications for methane emission inventories of natural gas infrastructure
journal, March 2015
- Howard, Touché; Ferrara, Thomas W.; Townsend-Small, Amy
- Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, Vol. 65, Issue 7
UK public perceptions of shale gas hydraulic fracturing: The role of audience, message and contextual factors on risk perceptions and policy support
journal, December 2015
- Whitmarsh, Lorraine; Nash, Nick; Upham, Paul
- Applied Energy, Vol. 160
Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States
journal, September 2013
- Allen, D. T.; Torres, V. M.; Thomas, J.
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 110, Issue 44
Remote sensing of fugitive methane emissions from oil and gas production in North American tight geologic formations: Remote sensing of fugitive methane emissions from oil and gas production
journal, October 2014
- Schneising, Oliver; Burrows, John P.; Dickerson, Russell R.
- Earth's Future, Vol. 2, Issue 10
Drivers of the US CO2 emissions 1997–2013
text, January 2015
- Feng, Kuishuang; Davis, Steven J.; Sun, Laixiang
- Digital Repository at the University of Maryland