DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The impact of shale gas on the cost and feasibility of meeting climate targets—A global energy system model analysis and an exploration of uncertainties

Abstract

There exists considerable uncertainty over both shale and conventional gas resource availability and extraction costs, as well as the fugitive methane emissions associated with shale gas extraction and its possible role in mitigating climate change. This study uses a multi-region energy system model, TIAM (TIMES integrated assessment model), to consider the impact of a range of conventional and shale gas cost and availability assessments on mitigation scenarios aimed at achieving a limit to global warming of below 2 °C in 2100, with a 50% likelihood. When adding shale gas to the global energy mix, the reduction to the global energy system cost is relatively small (up to 0.4%), and the mitigation cost increases by 1%–3% under all cost assumptions. The impact of a “dash for shale gas”, of unavailability of carbon capture and storage, of increased barriers to investment in low carbon technologies, and of higher than expected leakage rates, are also considered; and are each found to have the potential to increase the cost and reduce feasibility of meeting global temperature goals. Finally, we conclude that the extraction of shale gas is not likely to significantly reduce the effort required to mitigate climate change under globally coordinated action, butmore » could increase required mitigation effort if not handled sufficiently carefully.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [2]
  1. Imperial College London, London (United Kingdom)
  2. Met Office Hadley Centre, Devon (United Kingdom)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Imperial College London, London (United Kingdom)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
OSTI Identifier:
1358443
Grant/Contract Number:  
SC0009988
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Energies
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 10; Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 1996-1073
Publisher:
MDPI AG
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
04 OIL SHALES AND TAR SANDS; shale gas; natural gas; supply curves; climate change mitigation; energy system analysis; energy scenarios; TIMES Integrated AssessmentModel (TIAM); fugitive methane emissions; energy economics

Citation Formats

Few, Sheridan, Gambhir, Ajay, Napp, Tamaryn, Hawkes, Adam, Mangeon, Stephane, Bernie, Dan, and Lowe, Jason. The impact of shale gas on the cost and feasibility of meeting climate targets—A global energy system model analysis and an exploration of uncertainties. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.3390/en10020158.
Few, Sheridan, Gambhir, Ajay, Napp, Tamaryn, Hawkes, Adam, Mangeon, Stephane, Bernie, Dan, & Lowe, Jason. The impact of shale gas on the cost and feasibility of meeting climate targets—A global energy system model analysis and an exploration of uncertainties. United States. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10020158
Few, Sheridan, Gambhir, Ajay, Napp, Tamaryn, Hawkes, Adam, Mangeon, Stephane, Bernie, Dan, and Lowe, Jason. Fri . "The impact of shale gas on the cost and feasibility of meeting climate targets—A global energy system model analysis and an exploration of uncertainties". United States. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10020158. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1358443.
@article{osti_1358443,
title = {The impact of shale gas on the cost and feasibility of meeting climate targets—A global energy system model analysis and an exploration of uncertainties},
author = {Few, Sheridan and Gambhir, Ajay and Napp, Tamaryn and Hawkes, Adam and Mangeon, Stephane and Bernie, Dan and Lowe, Jason},
abstractNote = {There exists considerable uncertainty over both shale and conventional gas resource availability and extraction costs, as well as the fugitive methane emissions associated with shale gas extraction and its possible role in mitigating climate change. This study uses a multi-region energy system model, TIAM (TIMES integrated assessment model), to consider the impact of a range of conventional and shale gas cost and availability assessments on mitigation scenarios aimed at achieving a limit to global warming of below 2 °C in 2100, with a 50% likelihood. When adding shale gas to the global energy mix, the reduction to the global energy system cost is relatively small (up to 0.4%), and the mitigation cost increases by 1%–3% under all cost assumptions. The impact of a “dash for shale gas”, of unavailability of carbon capture and storage, of increased barriers to investment in low carbon technologies, and of higher than expected leakage rates, are also considered; and are each found to have the potential to increase the cost and reduce feasibility of meeting global temperature goals. Finally, we conclude that the extraction of shale gas is not likely to significantly reduce the effort required to mitigate climate change under globally coordinated action, but could increase required mitigation effort if not handled sufficiently carefully.},
doi = {10.3390/en10020158},
journal = {Energies},
number = 2,
volume = 10,
place = {United States},
year = {Fri Jan 27 00:00:00 EST 2017},
month = {Fri Jan 27 00:00:00 EST 2017}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 6 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States
journal, November 2013

  • Miller, S. M.; Wofsy, S. C.; Michalak, A. M.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 110, Issue 50
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1314392110

Deterministic and stochastic analysis of alternative climate targets under differentiated cooperation regimes
journal, December 2009


Information Collection, Access, and Dissemination to Support Evidence-Based Shale Gas Policies
journal, November 2014


International climate policy architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios
journal, December 2009


Unconventional gas – A review of regional and global resource estimates
journal, June 2013


Toward a better understanding and quantification of methane emissions from shale gas development
journal, April 2014

  • Caulton, D. R.; Shepson, P. B.; Santoro, R. L.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1316546111

Drivers of the US CO2 emissions 1997–2013
journal, July 2015

  • Feng, Kuishuang; Davis, Steven J.; Sun, Laixiang
  • Nature Communications, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8714

Reconciling divergent estimates of oil and gas methane emissions
journal, December 2015

  • Zavala-Araiza, Daniel; Lyon, David R.; Alvarez, Ramón A.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1522126112

Energy systems modeling for twenty-first century energy challenges
journal, May 2014

  • Pfenninger, Stefan; Hawkes, Adam; Keirstead, James
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 33
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.003

The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C
journal, January 2015


Boom or bust? Mapping out the known unknowns of global shale gas production potential
journal, May 2015


Methane Emissions from Conventional and Unconventional Natural Gas Production Sites in the Marcellus Shale Basin
journal, January 2016

  • Omara, Mark; Sullivan, Melissa R.; Li, Xiang
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 50, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b05503

Aircraft-Based Measurements of Point Source Methane Emissions in the Barnett Shale Basin
journal, June 2015

  • Lavoie, Tegan N.; Shepson, Paul B.; Cambaliza, Maria O. L.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00410

Natural gas: The fracking fallacy
journal, December 2014


Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure
journal, April 2012

  • Alvarez, R. A.; Pacala, S. W.; Winebrake, J. J.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 109, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1202407109

The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies
journal, January 2014

  • Kriegler, Elmar; Weyant, John P.; Blanford, Geoffrey J.
  • Climatic Change, Vol. 123, Issue 3-4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10584-013-0953-7

Well economics across ten tiers in low and high Btu (British thermal unit) areas, Barnett Shale, Texas
journal, October 2013


The Influence of Shale Gas on U.S. Energy and Environmental Policy
journal, January 2012

  • Jacoby, Henry D.; O'Sullivan, Francis M.; Paltsev, Sergey
  • Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5547/2160-5890.1.1.5

Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations: A letter
journal, April 2011


Methods of estimating shale gas resources – Comparison, evaluation and implications
journal, September 2013


A reality check on the shale revolution
journal, February 2013


Limited impact on decadal-scale climate change from increased use of natural gas
journal, October 2014

  • McJeon, Haewon; Edmonds, Jae; Bauer, Nico
  • Nature, Vol. 514, Issue 7523
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature13837

Quantifying atmospheric methane emissions from the Haynesville, Fayetteville, and northeastern Marcellus shale gas production regions: CH4 emissions from shale gas production
journal, March 2015

  • Peischl, J.; Ryerson, T. B.; Aikin, K. C.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 120, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014jd022697

Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change?
journal, November 2015


ETSAP-TIAM: the TIMES integrated assessment model Part I: Model structure
journal, February 2007


An Assessment of World Hydrocarbon Resources
journal, November 1997


Response to Comment on “Methane Emissions from Process Equipment at Natural Gas Production Sites in the United States: Pneumatic Controllers”
journal, February 2015

  • Allen, David T.; Sullivan, David W.; Harrison, Matt
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00941

Methane emissions estimate from airborne measurements over a western United States natural gas field: CH
journal, August 2013

  • Karion, Anna; Sweeney, Colm; Pétron, Gabrielle
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 40, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.1002/grl.50811

A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways
journal, October 2013


Shale gas production: potential versus actual greenhouse gas emissions
journal, November 2012


Modeling the Relative GHG Emissions of Conventional and Shale Gas Production
journal, December 2011

  • Stephenson, Trevor; Valle, Jose Eduardo; Riera-Palou, Xavier
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 45, Issue 24
  • DOI: 10.1021/es2024115

Sensor transition failure in the high flow sampler: Implications for methane emission inventories of natural gas infrastructure
journal, March 2015

  • Howard, Touché; Ferrara, Thomas W.; Townsend-Small, Amy
  • Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, Vol. 65, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2015.1025925

Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States
journal, September 2013

  • Allen, D. T.; Torres, V. M.; Thomas, J.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 110, Issue 44
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1304880110

Drivers of the US CO2 emissions 1997–2013
text, January 2015

  • Feng, Kuishuang; Davis, Steven J.; Sun, Laixiang
  • Digital Repository at the University of Maryland
  • DOI: 10.13016/m22z12p9f