DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Thermographic Microstructure Monitoring in Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing

Abstract

To reduce the uncertainty of build performance in metal additive manufacturing, robust process monitoring systems that can detect imperfections and improve repeatability are desired. One of the most promising methods for in-situ monitoring is thermographic imaging. However, there is a challenge in using this technology due to the difference in surface emittance between the metal powder and solidified part being observed that affects the accuracy of the temperature data collected. This developed a method for properly calibrating temperature profiles from thermographic data and then determining important characteristics of the build through additional processing. The thermographic data was analyzed to determine the transition of material from metal powder to a solid as-printed part. A corrected temperature profile was then assembled for each point using calibrations for these surface conditions. Using this data, we calculated the thermal gradient and solid-liquid interface velocity and correlated it to microstructural variation within the part experimentally. This work shows that by using a method of process monitoring, repeatability of a build could be monitored specifically in relation to microstructure control.

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [2];  [2];  [2];  [2];  [3]
  1. Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN (United States). Dept. of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Biomedical Engineering
  2. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Materials Science & Technology Division
  3. Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN (United States). Dept. of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Biomedical Engineering; Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). High Temperature Materials Lab. (HTML); Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Manufacturing Demonstration Facility (MDF)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Energy Efficiency Office. Advanced Manufacturing Office
OSTI Identifier:
1349606
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Scientific Reports
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 7; Journal ID: ISSN 2045-2322
Publisher:
Nature Publishing Group
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
36 MATERIALS SCIENCE; Electron Beam Melting; additive manufacturing; thermography; infrared imaging; process monitoring; microstructure

Citation Formats

Raplee, Jake B., Plotkowski, Alex J., Kirka, Michael M., Dinwiddie, Ralph Barton, Okello, Alfred O, Dehoff, Ryan R., and Babu, Sudarsanam Suresh. Thermographic Microstructure Monitoring in Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1038/srep43554.
Raplee, Jake B., Plotkowski, Alex J., Kirka, Michael M., Dinwiddie, Ralph Barton, Okello, Alfred O, Dehoff, Ryan R., & Babu, Sudarsanam Suresh. Thermographic Microstructure Monitoring in Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing. United States. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43554
Raplee, Jake B., Plotkowski, Alex J., Kirka, Michael M., Dinwiddie, Ralph Barton, Okello, Alfred O, Dehoff, Ryan R., and Babu, Sudarsanam Suresh. Fri . "Thermographic Microstructure Monitoring in Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing". United States. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43554. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1349606.
@article{osti_1349606,
title = {Thermographic Microstructure Monitoring in Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing},
author = {Raplee, Jake B. and Plotkowski, Alex J. and Kirka, Michael M. and Dinwiddie, Ralph Barton and Okello, Alfred O and Dehoff, Ryan R. and Babu, Sudarsanam Suresh},
abstractNote = {To reduce the uncertainty of build performance in metal additive manufacturing, robust process monitoring systems that can detect imperfections and improve repeatability are desired. One of the most promising methods for in-situ monitoring is thermographic imaging. However, there is a challenge in using this technology due to the difference in surface emittance between the metal powder and solidified part being observed that affects the accuracy of the temperature data collected. This developed a method for properly calibrating temperature profiles from thermographic data and then determining important characteristics of the build through additional processing. The thermographic data was analyzed to determine the transition of material from metal powder to a solid as-printed part. A corrected temperature profile was then assembled for each point using calibrations for these surface conditions. Using this data, we calculated the thermal gradient and solid-liquid interface velocity and correlated it to microstructural variation within the part experimentally. This work shows that by using a method of process monitoring, repeatability of a build could be monitored specifically in relation to microstructure control.},
doi = {10.1038/srep43554},
journal = {Scientific Reports},
number = ,
volume = 7,
place = {United States},
year = {Fri Mar 03 00:00:00 EST 2017},
month = {Fri Mar 03 00:00:00 EST 2017}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 91 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing
journal, March 2016


Site specific control of crystallographic grain orientation through electron beam additive manufacturing
journal, November 2014


Thermal effects on microstructural heterogeneity of Inconel 718 materials fabricated by electron beam melting
journal, July 2014

  • Sames, William J.; Unocic, Kinga A.; Dehoff, Ryan R.
  • Journal of Materials Research, Vol. 29, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2014.140

In situ quality control of the selective laser melting process using a high-speed, real-time melt pool monitoring system
journal, August 2014

  • Clijsters, S.; Craeghs, T.; Buls, S.
  • The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 75, Issue 5-8
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00170-014-6214-8

Detection of Process Failures in Layerwise Laser Melting with Optical Process Monitoring
journal, January 2012


Summary for Policymakers
book, March 2014


Review of in-situ process monitoring and in-situ metrology for metal additive manufacturing
journal, April 2016


Calibrating IR cameras for in-situ temperature measurement during the electron beam melt processing of Inconel 718 and Ti-Al6-V4
conference, June 2016

  • Dinwiddie, R. B.; Kirka, M. M.; Lloyd, P. D.
  • SPIE Commercial + Scientific Sensing and Imaging, SPIE Proceedings
  • DOI: 10.1117/12.2229070

The Prediction of the Emissivity and Thermal Conductivity of Powder Beds
journal, July 2004


Steady state columnar and equiaxed growth of dendrites and eutectic
journal, July 1984


Correlation between solidification parameters and weld microstructures
journal, January 1989


Single-crystal laser deposition of superalloys: processing–microstructure maps
journal, April 2001


Metallurgy of additive manufacturing: Examples from electron beam melting
journal, January 2015


Facteurs influençant le refus de consulter au centre de santé dans la région rurale Ouest du Burkina Faso
journal, January 2016

  • Ilboudo, Sidbéwendin David Olivier; Sombié, Issa; Soubeiga, André Kamba
  • Santé Publique, Vol. 28, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.3917/spub.163.0391

Tailoring the grain structure of IN718 during selective electron beam melting
journal, January 2014


Strong morphological and crystallographic texture and resulting yield strength anisotropy in selective laser melted tantalum
journal, July 2013


Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures.
journal, July 1964

  • Savitzky, Abraham.; Golay, M. J. E.
  • Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 36, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1021/ac60214a047

Metallurgy of additive manufacturing: Examples from electron beam melting
journal, January 2015


Detection of Process Failures in Layerwise Laser Melting with Optical Process Monitoring
journal, January 2012


Tailoring the grain structure of IN718 during selective electron beam melting
journal, January 2014


Calibrating IR cameras for in-situ temperature measurement during the electron beam melt processing of Inconel 718 and Ti-Al6-V4
conference, June 2016

  • Dinwiddie, R. B.; Kirka, M. M.; Lloyd, P. D.
  • SPIE Commercial + Scientific Sensing and Imaging, SPIE Proceedings
  • DOI: 10.1117/12.2229070

Works referencing / citing this record:

In Operando Monitoring by Analysis of Backscattered Electrons during Electron Beam Melting
journal, December 2019

  • Arnold, Christopher; Böhm, Jonas; Körner, Carolin
  • Advanced Engineering Materials, Vol. 22, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1002/adem.201901102

Pilot capability evaluation of a feedback electronic imaging system prototype for in-process monitoring in electron beam additive manufacturing
journal, September 2018

  • Wong, Hay; Neary, Derek; Jones, Eric
  • The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 100, Issue 1-4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00170-018-2702-6

Additive Manufacturing of Nickel Superalloys: Opportunities for Innovation and Challenges Related to Qualification
journal, June 2018

  • Babu, S. S.; Raghavan, N.; Raplee, J.
  • Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, Vol. 49, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11661-018-4702-4