DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Use of North American and European air quality networks to evaluate global chemistry–climate modeling of surface ozone

Abstract

Here we test the current generation of global chemistry–climate models in their ability to simulate observed, present-day surface ozone. Models are evaluated against hourly surface ozone from 4217 stations in North America and Europe that are averaged over 1° × 1° grid cells, allowing commensurate model–measurement comparison. Models are generally biased high during all hours of the day and in all regions. Most models simulate the shape of regional summertime diurnal and annual cycles well, correctly matching the timing of hourly (~ 15:00 local time (LT)) and monthly (mid-June) peak surface ozone abundance. The amplitude of these cycles is less successfully matched. The observed summertime diurnal range (~ 25 ppb) is underestimated in all regions by about 7 ppb, and the observed seasonal range (~ 21 ppb) is underestimated by about 5 ppb except in the most polluted regions, where it is overestimated by about 5 ppb. The models generally match the pattern of the observed summertime ozone enhancement, but they overestimate its magnitude in most regions. Most models capture the observed distribution of extreme episode sizes, correctly showing that about 80 % of individual extreme events occur in large-scale, multi-day episodes of more than 100 grid cells. The modelsmore » also match the observed linear relationship between episode size and a measure of episode intensity, which shows increases in ozone abundance by up to 6 ppb for larger-sized episodes. Lastly, we conclude that the skill of the models evaluated here provides confidence in their projections of future surface ozone.« less

Authors:
; ; ; ; ; ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ORCiD logo
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER); National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA); National Science Foundation (NSF)
OSTI Identifier:
1227576
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1341966
Report Number(s):
LLNL-JRNL-667324
Journal ID: ISSN 1680-7324
Grant/Contract Number:  
SC0007021; AC52-07NA27344; AC02-05CH11231; NNX09AJ47G; NNX13AL12G; NNX15AE35G
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (Online)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (Online) Journal Volume: 15 Journal Issue: 18; Journal ID: ISSN 1680-7324
Publisher:
Copernicus Publications, EGU
Country of Publication:
Germany
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Citation Formats

Schnell, J. L., Prather, M. J., Josse, B., Naik, V., Horowitz, L. W., Cameron-Smith, P., Bergmann, D., Zeng, G., Plummer, D. A., Sudo, K., Nagashima, T., Shindell, D. T., Faluvegi, G., and Strode, S. A. Use of North American and European air quality networks to evaluate global chemistry–climate modeling of surface ozone. Germany: N. p., 2015. Web. doi:10.5194/acp-15-10581-2015.
Schnell, J. L., Prather, M. J., Josse, B., Naik, V., Horowitz, L. W., Cameron-Smith, P., Bergmann, D., Zeng, G., Plummer, D. A., Sudo, K., Nagashima, T., Shindell, D. T., Faluvegi, G., & Strode, S. A. Use of North American and European air quality networks to evaluate global chemistry–climate modeling of surface ozone. Germany. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10581-2015
Schnell, J. L., Prather, M. J., Josse, B., Naik, V., Horowitz, L. W., Cameron-Smith, P., Bergmann, D., Zeng, G., Plummer, D. A., Sudo, K., Nagashima, T., Shindell, D. T., Faluvegi, G., and Strode, S. A. Fri . "Use of North American and European air quality networks to evaluate global chemistry–climate modeling of surface ozone". Germany. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10581-2015.
@article{osti_1227576,
title = {Use of North American and European air quality networks to evaluate global chemistry–climate modeling of surface ozone},
author = {Schnell, J. L. and Prather, M. J. and Josse, B. and Naik, V. and Horowitz, L. W. and Cameron-Smith, P. and Bergmann, D. and Zeng, G. and Plummer, D. A. and Sudo, K. and Nagashima, T. and Shindell, D. T. and Faluvegi, G. and Strode, S. A.},
abstractNote = {Here we test the current generation of global chemistry–climate models in their ability to simulate observed, present-day surface ozone. Models are evaluated against hourly surface ozone from 4217 stations in North America and Europe that are averaged over 1° × 1° grid cells, allowing commensurate model–measurement comparison. Models are generally biased high during all hours of the day and in all regions. Most models simulate the shape of regional summertime diurnal and annual cycles well, correctly matching the timing of hourly (~ 15:00 local time (LT)) and monthly (mid-June) peak surface ozone abundance. The amplitude of these cycles is less successfully matched. The observed summertime diurnal range (~ 25 ppb) is underestimated in all regions by about 7 ppb, and the observed seasonal range (~ 21 ppb) is underestimated by about 5 ppb except in the most polluted regions, where it is overestimated by about 5 ppb. The models generally match the pattern of the observed summertime ozone enhancement, but they overestimate its magnitude in most regions. Most models capture the observed distribution of extreme episode sizes, correctly showing that about 80 % of individual extreme events occur in large-scale, multi-day episodes of more than 100 grid cells. The models also match the observed linear relationship between episode size and a measure of episode intensity, which shows increases in ozone abundance by up to 6 ppb for larger-sized episodes. Lastly, we conclude that the skill of the models evaluated here provides confidence in their projections of future surface ozone.},
doi = {10.5194/acp-15-10581-2015},
journal = {Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (Online)},
number = 18,
volume = 15,
place = {Germany},
year = {Fri Sep 25 00:00:00 EDT 2015},
month = {Fri Sep 25 00:00:00 EDT 2015}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10581-2015

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 36 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

On the impact of the vertical resolution on chemistry-transport modelling
journal, March 2013


Ozone in rural areas of the United States
journal, June 1989


Sulfur, sea salt, and radionuclide aerosols in GISS ModelE
journal, January 2006

  • Koch, Dorothy; Schmidt, Gavin A.; Field, Christy V.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 111, Issue D6
  • DOI: 10.1029/2004JD005550

Effects of future climate change on regional air pollution episodes in the United States
journal, January 2004


Impact of future land use and land cover changes on atmospheric chemistry-climate interactions
journal, January 2010

  • Ganzeveld, Laurens; Bouwman, Lex; Stehfest, Elke
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 115, Issue D23
  • DOI: 10.1029/2010JD014041

Fresh air in the 21st century?: FRESH AIR IN THE 21ST CENTURY?
journal, January 2003

  • Prather, Michael; Gauss, Michael; Berntsen, Terje
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 30, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1029/2002GL016285

Skill in forecasting extreme ozone pollution episodes with a global atmospheric chemistry model
journal, January 2014

  • Schnell, J. L.; Holmes, C. D.; Jangam, A.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 14, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-14-7721-2014

Pre-industrial to end 21st century projections of tropospheric ozone from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP)
journal, January 2013

  • Young, P. J.; Archibald, A. T.; Bowman, K. W.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 13, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-13-2063-2013

Impact of climate change on tropospheric ozone and its global budgets
journal, January 2008

  • Zeng, G.; Pyle, J. A.; Young, P. J.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 8, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-8-369-2008

Multimodel estimates of intercontinental source-receptor relationships for ozone pollution
journal, January 2009

  • Fiore, A. M.; Dentener, F. J.; Wild, O.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 114, Issue D4
  • DOI: 10.1029/2008JD010816

Coupling dry deposition to vegetation phenology in the Community Earth System Model: Implications for the simulation of surface O 3
journal, April 2014

  • Val Martin, M.; Heald, C. L.; Arnold, S. R.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 41, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014GL059651

Introduction
book, January 2003


Interactive ozone and methane chemistry in GISS-E2 historical and future climate simulations
journal, January 2013

  • Shindell, D. T.; Pechony, O.; Voulgarakis, A.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 13, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-13-2653-2013

The Dynamical Core, Physical Parameterizations, and Basic Simulation Characteristics of the Atmospheric Component AM3 of the GFDL Global Coupled Model CM3
journal, July 2011

  • Donner, Leo J.; Wyman, Bruce L.; Hemler, Richard S.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 24, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1175/2011JCLI3955.1

Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram
journal, April 2001

  • Taylor, Karl E.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 106, Issue D7
  • DOI: 10.1029/2000JD900719

Impact of preindustrial to present-day changes in short-lived pollutant emissions on atmospheric composition and climate forcing: IMPACT OF SHORT-LIVED POLLUTANT EMISSION
journal, July 2013

  • Naik, Vaishali; Horowitz, Larry W.; Fiore, Arlene M.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50608

The response of tropical tropospheric ozone to ENSO: OZONE RESPONSE TO ENSO
journal, July 2011

  • Oman, L. D.; Ziemke, J. R.; Douglass, A. R.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 38, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011GL047865

Correlating tropospheric column ozone with tropopause folds: the Aura-OMI satellite data
journal, January 2010


DO 3 SE modelling of soil moisture to determine ozone flux to forest trees
journal, January 2012

  • Büker, P.; Morrissey, T.; Briolat, A.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 12, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-12-5537-2012

The Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP): overview and description of models, simulations and climate diagnostics
journal, January 2013

  • Lamarque, J. -F.; Shindell, D. T.; Josse, B.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-6-179-2013

Can a global model reproduce observed trends in summertime surface ozone levels?
journal, January 2012


Occurrence and persistence of future atmospheric stagnation events
journal, June 2014

  • Horton, Daniel E.; Skinner, Christopher B.; Singh, Deepti
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 4, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2272

Radon global simulations with the multiscale chemistry and transport model MOCAGE
journal, September 2004


Modelling future changes in surface ozone: a parameterized approach
journal, January 2012

  • Wild, O.; Fiore, A. M.; Shindell, D. T.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 12, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-12-2037-2012

Surface ozone variability and the jet position: Implications for projecting future air quality: OZONE VARIABILITY, JET, AND CLIMATE CHANGE
journal, June 2013

  • Barnes, Elizabeth A.; Fiore, Arlene M.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 40, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1002/grl.50411

Toward an Earth system model: atmospheric chemistry, coupling, and petascale computing
journal, September 2006


Impact of stratospheric ozone recovery on tropospheric ozone and its budget: IMPACT OF OZONE RECOVERY ON TROPOSPHERIC OZONE
journal, May 2010

  • Zeng, G.; Morgenstern, O.; Braesicke, P.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 37, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1029/2010GL042812

The influence of foreign vs. North American emissions on surface ozone in the US
journal, January 2009

  • Reidmiller, D. R.; Fiore, A. M.; Jaffe, D. A.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 9, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-9-5027-2009

MIROC-ESM 2010: model description and basic results of CMIP5-20c3m experiments
journal, January 2011

  • Watanabe, S.; Hajima, T.; Sudo, K.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 4, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-4-845-2011

North American influence on tropospheric ozone and the effects of recent emission reductions: Constraints from ICARTT observations
journal, January 2009

  • Hudman, R. C.; Murray, L. T.; Jacob, D. J.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 114, Issue D7
  • DOI: 10.1029/2008JD010126

Technical Note: The CCCma third generation AGCM and its extension into the middle atmosphere
journal, January 2008

  • Scinocca, J. F.; McFarlane, N. A.; Lazare, M.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 8, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-8-7055-2008

Observations and modeling of air quality trends over 1990–2010 across the Northern Hemisphere: China, the United States and Europe
journal, January 2015


Impacts of climate change on surface ozone and intercontinental ozone pollution: A multi-model study: CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS ON O
journal, May 2013

  • Doherty, R. M.; Wild, O.; Shindell, D. T.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50266

Future methane, hydroxyl, and their uncertainties: key climate and emission parameters for future predictions
journal, January 2013

  • Holmes, C. D.; Prather, M. J.; Søvde, O. A.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 13, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-13-285-2013