DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The DES Science Verification Weak Lensing Shear Catalogs

Abstract

Here, we present weak lensing shear catalogues for 139 square degrees of data taken during the Science Verification (SV) time for the new Dark Energy Camera (DECam) being used for the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We also describe our object selection, point spread function estimation and shear measurement procedures using two independent shear pipelines, IM3SHAPE and NGMIX, which produce catalogues of 2.12 million and 3.44 million galaxies, respectively. Furthermore, we detail a set of null tests for the shear measurements and find that they pass the requirements for systematic errors at the level necessary for weak lensing science applications using the SV data. Finally, we discuss some of the planned algorithmic improvements that will be necessary to produce sufficiently accurate shear catalogues for the full 5-yr DES, which is expected to cover 5000 square degrees.

Authors:
 [1]
  1. Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (United States). et al.
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States); Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP)
Contributing Org.:
DES Collaboration
OSTI Identifier:
1223235
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1336165
Report Number(s):
FERMILAB-PUB-15-309-AE; BNL-112730-2016-JA
Journal ID: ISSN 1365-2966; arXiv eprint number arXiv:1507.05603; TRN: US1601624
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-07CH11359; SC00112704; AC02-98CH10886; SC0007901; SC0007859
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (Online)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (Online); Journal Volume: 460; Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 1365-2966
Publisher:
Royal Astronomical Society
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS; gravitational lensing: weak; methods: data analysis; techniques: image processing; catalogues; surveys; cosmology: observations

Citation Formats

Jarvis, M. The DES Science Verification Weak Lensing Shear Catalogs. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw990.
Jarvis, M. The DES Science Verification Weak Lensing Shear Catalogs. United States. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw990
Jarvis, M. Sun . "The DES Science Verification Weak Lensing Shear Catalogs". United States. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw990. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1223235.
@article{osti_1223235,
title = {The DES Science Verification Weak Lensing Shear Catalogs},
author = {Jarvis, M.},
abstractNote = {Here, we present weak lensing shear catalogues for 139 square degrees of data taken during the Science Verification (SV) time for the new Dark Energy Camera (DECam) being used for the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We also describe our object selection, point spread function estimation and shear measurement procedures using two independent shear pipelines, IM3SHAPE and NGMIX, which produce catalogues of 2.12 million and 3.44 million galaxies, respectively. Furthermore, we detail a set of null tests for the shear measurements and find that they pass the requirements for systematic errors at the level necessary for weak lensing science applications using the SV data. Finally, we discuss some of the planned algorithmic improvements that will be necessary to produce sufficiently accurate shear catalogues for the full 5-yr DES, which is expected to cover 5000 square degrees.},
doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw990},
journal = {Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (Online)},
number = 2,
volume = 460,
place = {United States},
year = {Sun May 01 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Sun May 01 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 124 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

The Second Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
journal, July 2004

  • Abazajian, Kevork; Adelman-McCarthy, Jennifer K.; Agüeros, Marcel A.
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 128, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/421365

Systematic bias in cosmic shear: extending the Fisher matrix
journal, November 2008


The brighter-fatter effect and pixel correlations in CCD sensors
journal, March 2014


Cosmic shear E/B-mode estimation with binned correlation function data
journal, August 2013

  • Becker, Matthew R.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 435, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1396

Fourier band-power E/B-mode estimators for cosmic shear
journal, January 2016

  • Becker, Matthew R.; Rozo, Eduardo
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 457, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv3018

An Ultra Fast Image Generator (UFig) for wide-field astronomy
journal, February 2013


Shape measurement biases from underfitting and ellipticity gradients: Shape measurement biases
journal, June 2010


Bayesian lensing shear measurement
journal, January 2014

  • Bernstein, Gary M.; Armstrong, Robert
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 438, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt2326

Resampling Images in Fourier Domain
journal, March 2014

  • Bernstein, Gary M.; Gruen, Daniel
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Vol. 126, Issue 937
  • DOI: 10.1086/675812

Shapes and Shears, Stars and Smears: Optimal Measurements for Weak Lensing
journal, February 2002

  • Bernstein, G. M.; Jarvis, M.
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 123, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/338085

SExtractor: Software for source extraction
journal, June 1996

  • Bertin, E.; Arnouts, S.
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, Vol. 117, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1051/aas:1996164

Using neural networks to estimate redshift distributions. An application to CFHTLenS
journal, March 2015

  • Bonnett, Christopher
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 449, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv230

Handbook for the GREAT08 Challenge: An image analysis competition for cosmological lensing
journal, March 2009

  • Bridle, Sarah; Shawe-Taylor, John; Amara, Adam
  • The Annals of Applied Statistics, Vol. 3, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1214/08-AOAS222

Results of the GREAT08 Challenge★: an image analysis competition for cosmological lensing: Results of the GREAT08 Challenge
journal, May 2010


Calibrated Ultra fast Image Simulations for the dark Energy Survey
journal, January 2016

  • Bruderer, Claudio; Chang, Chihway; Refregier, Alexandre
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 817, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/0004-637X/817/1/25

The 10 Meter South Pole Telescope
journal, May 2011

  • Carlstrom, J. E.; Ade, P. A. R.; Aird, K. A.
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Vol. 123, Issue 903
  • DOI: 10.1086/659879

Atmospheric point spread function interpolation for weak lensing in short exposure imaging data: Atmospheric PSF interpolation
journal, November 2012


The effective number density of galaxies for weak lensing measurements in the LSST project
journal, July 2013

  • Chang, C.; Jarvis, M.; Jain, B.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 434, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1156

Spin‐induced Galaxy Alignments and Their Implications for Weak‐Lensing Measurements
journal, October 2001

  • Crittenden, Robert G.; Natarajan, Priyamvada; Pen, Ue‐Li
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 559, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/322370

The Blanco Cosmology Survey: data Acquisition, Processing, Calibration, Quality Diagnostics, and data Release
journal, September 2012


The Dark Energy Survey Camera (DECam)
journal, January 2012


The Dark Energy Survey and operations: Year 1
conference, August 2014

  • Diehl, H. T.; Abbott, T. M. C.; Annis, J.
  • SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation, SPIE Proceedings
  • DOI: 10.1117/12.2056982

Use of the Hough transformation to detect lines and curves in pictures
journal, January 1972

  • Duda, Richard O.; Hart, Peter E.
  • Communications of the ACM, Vol. 15, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1145/361237.361242

The dark Energy Camera
journal, October 2015


emcee : The MCMC Hammer
journal, March 2013

  • Foreman-Mackey, Daniel; Hogg, David W.; Lang, Dustin
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Vol. 125, Issue 925
  • DOI: 10.1086/670067

Very weak lensing in the CFHTLS wide: cosmology from cosmic shear in the linear regime
journal, December 2007


Interpolating point spread function anisotropy
journal, December 2012


HEALPix: A Framework for High‐Resolution Discretization and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere
journal, April 2005

  • Gorski, K. M.; Hivon, E.; Banday, A. J.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 622, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/427976

Weak lensing analysis of RXC J2248.7−4431
journal, April 2013

  • Gruen, D.; Brimioulle, F.; Seitz, S.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 432, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt566

Evidence for self-interaction of charge distribution in charge-coupled devices
journal, February 2015


Cosmological weak lensing with the HST GEMS survey
journal, July 2005


The Shear Testing Programme – I. Weak lensing analysis of simulated ground-based observations
journal, April 2006

  • Heymans, Catherine; Van Waerbeke, Ludovic; Bacon, David
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 368, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10198.x

The impact of high spatial frequency atmospheric distortions on weak-lensing measurements: Atmospheric distortions
journal, February 2012


CFHTLenS: the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey: CFHTLenS
journal, October 2012

  • Heymans, Catherine; Van Waerbeke, Ludovic; Miller, Lance
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 427, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21952.x

Shear calibration biases in weak-lensing surveys
journal, August 2003


Galaxy-galaxy weak lensing in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: intrinsic alignments and shear calibration errors
journal, September 2004

  • Hirata, Christopher M.; Mandelbaum, Rachel; Seljak, Uroš
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 353, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08090.x

Replacing Standard Galaxy Profiles with Mixtures of Gaussians
journal, June 2013

  • Hogg, David W.; Lang, Dustin
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Vol. 125, Issue 928
  • DOI: 10.1086/671228

The readout and control system of the Dark Energy Camera
conference, September 2012

  • Honscheid, Klaus; Elliott, Ann; Annis, James
  • SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation, SPIE Proceedings
  • DOI: 10.1117/12.925717

Weak-Lensing Results from the 75 Square Degree Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory Survey
journal, March 2003

  • Jarvis, M.; Bernstein, G. M.; Fischer, P.
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 125, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1086/367799

COSMIC SHEAR RESULTS FROM THE DEEP LENS SURVEY. I. JOINT CONSTRAINTS ON Ω M AND σ 8 WITH A TWO-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS
journal, February 2013

  • Jee, M. James; Tyson, J. Anthony; Schneider, Michael D.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 765, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/765/1/74

Measurement and calibration of noise bias in weak lensing galaxy shape estimation
journal, December 2012


Sersic galaxy models in weak lensing shape measurement: model bias, noise bias and their interaction
journal, May 2014

  • Kacprzak, T.; Bridle, S.; Rowe, B.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 441, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu588

A Method for Weak Lensing Observations
journal, August 1995

  • Kaiser, Nick; Squires, Gordon; Broadhurst, Tom
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 449
  • DOI: 10.1086/176071

The impact of cosmic variance on simulating weak lensing surveys
journal, April 2015

  • Kannawadi, Arun; Mandelbaum, Rachel; Lackner, Claire
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 449, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv520

Gravitational Lensing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) Challenge Handbook
journal, September 2011

  • Kitching, Thomas; Amara, Adam; Gill, Mandeep
  • The Annals of Applied Statistics, Vol. 5, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1214/11-AOAS484

Image analysis for cosmology: results from the GREAT10 Galaxy Challenge: GREAT10 Galaxy Challenge
journal, June 2012


Image Analysis for Cosmology: Results from the Great10 star Challenge
journal, March 2013

  • Kitching, T. D.; Rowe, B.; Gill, M.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 205, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/205/2/12

Blind Analysis in Nuclear and Particle Physics
journal, December 2005


The COSMOS Survey: Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys Observations and Data Processing
journal, September 2007

  • Koekemoer, A. M.; Aussel, H.; Calzetti, D.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 172, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/520086

Gravitational lensing analysis of the Kilo-Degree Survey
journal, October 2015

  • Kuijken, Konrad; Heymans, Catherine; Hildebrandt, Hendrik
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 454, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2140

Weak Gravitational Lensing with COSMOS: Galaxy Selection and Shape Measurements
journal, September 2007

  • Leauthaud, Alexie; Massey, Richard; Kneib, Jean‐Paul
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 172, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/516598

Galaxy shear estimation from stacked images
journal, September 2009


Systematic errors in weak lensing: application to SDSS galaxy-galaxy weak lensing
journal, August 2005


Precision simulation of ground-based lensing data using observations from space: Ground-based image simulation
journal, December 2011

  • Mandelbaum, Rachel; Hirata, Christopher M.; Leauthaud, Alexie
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 420, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20138.x

The Third Gravitational Lensing Accuracy Testing (Great3) Challenge Handbook
journal, April 2014

  • Mandelbaum, Rachel; Rowe, Barnaby; Bosch, James
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 212, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/5

GREAT3 results – I. Systematic errors in shear estimation and the impact of real galaxy morphology
journal, May 2015

  • Mandelbaum, Rachel; Rowe, Barnaby; Armstrong, Robert
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 450, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv781

An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters
journal, June 1963

  • Marquardt, Donald W.
  • Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 11, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1137/0111030

Polar shapelets
journal, October 2005


The Shear Testing Programme 2: Factors affecting high-precision weak-lensing analyses
journal, March 2007


Means of confusion: how pixel noise affects shear estimates for weak gravitational lensing: How pixel noise affects shear estimates
journal, July 2012


Limitations on shapelet-based weak-lensing measurements
journal, February 2010


Weak gravitational lensing with deimos: Weak gravitational lensing with deimos
journal, March 2011


Mass and galaxy distributions of four massive galaxy clusters from Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
journal, March 2015

  • Melchior, P.; Suchyta, E.; Huff, E.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 449, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv398

Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
journal, June 1953

  • Metropolis, Nicholas; Rosenbluth, Arianna W.; Rosenbluth, Marshall N.
  • The Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 21, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.1699114

Impact of Atmospheric Chromatic Effects on weak Lensing Measurements
journal, July 2015


Bayesian galaxy shape measurement for weak lensing surveys - I. Methodology and a fast-fitting algorithm
journal, November 2007


Bayesian galaxy shape measurement for weak lensing surveys – III. Application to the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey
journal, January 2013

  • Miller, L.; Heymans, C.; Kitching, T. D.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 429, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sts454

The Dark Energy Survey data processing and calibration system
conference, September 2012

  • Mohr, Joseph J.; Armstrong, Robert; Bertin, Emmanuel
  • SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation, SPIE Proceedings
  • DOI: 10.1117/12.926785

Shear Recovery Accuracy in Weak-Lensing Analysis with the Elliptical Gauss-Laguerre Method
journal, March 2007

  • Nakajima, Reiko; Bernstein, Gary
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 133, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1086/511957

A Simplex Method for Function Minimization
journal, January 1965


Point spread function calibration requirements for dark energy from cosmic shear
journal, March 2008


Atmospheric Dispersion Effects in Weak Lensing Measurements
journal, October 2012

  • Alejandro Plazas, Andrés; Bernstein, Gary
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Vol. 124, Issue 920
  • DOI: 10.1086/668294

Noise bias in weak lensing shape measurements: Noise bias in lensing shape measurement
journal, August 2012

  • Refregier, Alexandre; Kacprzak, Tomasz; Amara, Adam
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 425, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21483.x

Weak Lensing Measurements: A Revisited Method and Application to Hubble Space Telescope Images
journal, June 2000

  • Rhodes, Jason; Refregier, Alexandre; Groth, Edward J.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 536, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/308902

Wavefront sensing and the active optics system of the dark energy camera
conference, July 2014

  • Roodman, Aaron; Reil, Kevin; Davis, Chris
  • SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation, SPIE Proceedings
  • DOI: 10.1117/12.2056904

Improving PSF modelling for weak gravitational lensing using new methods in model selection
journal, February 2010


GalSim: The modular galaxy image simulation toolkit
journal, April 2015


The Redmapper Galaxy Cluster Catalog from des Science Verification data
journal, May 2016

  • Rykoff, E. S.; Rozo, E.; Hollowood, D.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 224, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/0067-0049/224/1/1

Photometric redshift analysis in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
journal, October 2014

  • Sánchez, C.; Carrasco Kind, M.; Lin, H.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 445, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1836

B-modes in cosmic shear from source redshift clustering
journal, July 2002


Cosmic shear analysis of archival HST/ACS data: I. Comparison of early ACS pure parallel data to the HST/GEMS survey
journal, April 2007


Evidence of the accelerated expansion of the Universe from weak lensing tomography with COSMOS
journal, June 2010


An implementation of Bayesian lensing shear measurement
journal, July 2014

  • Sheldon, Erin S.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, Vol. 444, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slu104

The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS)
journal, February 2006

  • Skrutskie, M. F.; Cutri, R. M.; Stiening, R.
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 131, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/498708

Star/galaxy separation at faint magnitudes: application to a simulated Dark Energy Survey
journal, April 2015

  • Soumagnac, M. T.; Abdalla, F. B.; Lahav, O.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 450, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1410

Large format filter changer mechanism for the dark energy survey
conference, July 2010

  • Tarlé, G.; Bigelow, B.; Boprie, D.
  • SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation, SPIE Proceedings
  • DOI: 10.1117/12.857426

Probing galaxy dark matter haloes in COSMOS with weak lensing flexion: Flexion in COSMOS
journal, January 2011


Limitations of model-fitting methods for lensing shear estimation
journal, March 2010


Weighing the Giants – I. Weak-lensing masses for 51 massive galaxy clusters: project overview, data analysis methods and cluster images
journal, February 2014

  • von der Linden, Anja; Allen, Mark T.; Applegate, Douglas E.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 439, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1945

Detection of weak gravitational lensing distortions of distant galaxies by cosmic dark matter at large scales
journal, May 2000

  • Wittman, David M.; Tyson, J. Anthony; Kirkman, David
  • Nature, Vol. 405, Issue 6783
  • DOI: 10.1038/35012001

Cosmic shears should not be measured in conventional ways: Unconventional cosmic shear measurement
journal, May 2011


im3shape: a maximum likelihood galaxy shear measurement code for cosmic gravitational lensing
journal, July 2013

  • Zuntz, Joe; Kacprzak, Tomasz; Voigt, Lisa
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 434, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1125

Works referencing / citing this record:

The Galaxy Cluster Mass Scale and Its Impact on Cosmological Constraints from the Cluster Population
journal, February 2019


Gravitational lensing detection of an extremely dense environment around a galaxy cluster
journal, July 2018


The Effect of Detector Nonlinearity on WFIRST PSF Profiles for Weak Gravitational Lensing Measurements
journal, September 2016


redMaGiC: selecting luminous red galaxies from the DES Science Verification data
journal, May 2016

  • Rozo, E.; Rykoff, E. S.; Abate, A.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 461, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1281

Cosmology constraints from shear peak statistics in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
journal, August 2016

  • Kacprzak, T.; Kirk, D.; Friedrich, O.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 463, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2070

SKA weak lensing– II. Simulated performance and survey design considerations
journal, August 2016

  • Bonaldi, Anna; Harrison, Ian; Camera, Stefano
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 463, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2104

Cosmic shear as a probe of galaxy formation physics
journal, September 2016

  • Foreman, Simon; Becker, Matthew R.; Wechsler, Risa H.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 463, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2189

Radio–optical galaxy shape correlations in the COSMOS field
journal, September 2016

  • Tunbridge, Ben; Harrison, Ian; Brown, Michael L.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 463, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2224

KiDS-450: cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing
journal, November 2016

  • Hildebrandt, H.; Viola, M.; Heymans, C.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 465, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2805

The Catalina Surveys Southern periodic variable star catalogue
journal, May 2017

  • Drake, A. J.; Djorgovski, S. G.; Catelan, M.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 469, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1085

KiDS-450: the tomographic weak lensing power spectrum and constraints on cosmological parameters
journal, July 2017

  • Köhlinger, F.; Viola, M.; Joachimi, B.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 471, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1820

KiDS-450: cosmological constraints from weak lensing peak statistics – I. Inference from analytical prediction of high signal-to-noise ratio convergence peaks
journal, November 2017

  • Shan, HuanYuan; Liu, Xiangkun; Hildebrandt, Hendrik
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 474, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2837

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: the impact of galaxy neighbours on weak lensing cosmology with im3shape
journal, December 2017

  • Samuroff, S.; Bridle, S. L.; Zuntz, J.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 475, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx3282

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: weak lensing shape catalogues
journal, August 2018

  • Zuntz, J.; Sheldon, E.; Samuroff, S.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 481, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2219

Weak lensing shear calibration with simulations of the HSC survey
journal, September 2018

  • Mandelbaum, Rachel; Lanusse, François; Leauthaud, Alexie
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 481, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2420

The effects of calibration on the bias of shear measurements
journal, October 2018

  • Gillis, Bryan R.; Taylor, A. N.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 482, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2637

Radio galaxy shape measurement with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo in the visibility domain
journal, October 2018

  • Rivi, M.; Lochner, M.; Balan, S. T.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 482, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2700

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: weak lensing mass calibration of redMaPPer galaxy clusters
journal, October 2018

  • McClintock, T.; Varga, T. N.; Gruen, D.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 482, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2711

A unified analysis of four cosmic shear surveys
journal, October 2018

  • Chang, Chihway; Wang, Michael; Dodelson, Scott
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 482, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2902

The gravitational and lensing-ISW bispectrum of 21 cm radiation
journal, December 2018

  • Schmit, Claude J.; Heavens, Alan F.; Pritchard, Jonathan R.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 483, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3400

Radio weak lensing shear measurement in the visibility domain – II. Source extraction
journal, February 2018

  • Rivi, M.; Miller, L.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 476, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty371

Cross-correlation redshift calibration without spectroscopic calibration samples in DES Science Verification Data
journal, March 2018

  • Davis, C.; Rozo, E.; Roodman, A.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 477, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty787

KiDS-i-800: comparing weak gravitational lensing measurements from same-sky surveys
journal, April 2018

  • Amon, A.; Heymans, C.; Klaes, D.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 477, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty859

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: redshift distributions of the weak-lensing source galaxies
journal, April 2018

  • Hoyle, B.; Gruen, D.; Bernstein, G. M.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 478, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty957

Galaxies in X-ray selected clusters and groups in Dark Energy Survey data – II. Hierarchical Bayesian modelling of the red-sequence galaxy luminosity function
journal, June 2019

  • Zhang, Y.; Miller, C. J.; Rooney, P.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 488, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1612

Radio–optical galaxy shape and shear correlations in the COSMOS field using 3 GHz VLA observations
journal, July 2019

  • Hillier, Tom; Brown, Michael L.; Harrison, Ian
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 488, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2098

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: constraints on intrinsic alignments and their colour dependence from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
journal, August 2019

  • Samuroff, S.; Blazek, J.; Troxel, M. A.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 489, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2197

A new sample of southern radio galaxies: host-galaxy masses and star-formation rates
journal, August 2019

  • Marubini, Takalani; Jarvis, Matt J.; Fine, Stephen
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 489, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2371

Galaxy shape measurement with convolutional neural networks
journal, August 2019

  • Ribli, Dezső; Dobos, László; Csabai, István
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 489, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2374

The Wendelstein Weak Lensing (WWL) pathfinder: accurate weak lensing masses for Planck clusters
journal, March 2019

  • Rehmann, R. L.; Gruen, D.; Seitz, S.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 486, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz817

The Hyper Suprime-Cam software pipeline
journal, October 2017

  • Bosch, James; Armstrong, Robert; Bickerton, Steven
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, Vol. 70, Issue SP1
  • DOI: 10.1093/pasj/psx080

Cosmology from cosmic shear power spectra with Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam first-year data
journal, March 2019

  • Hikage, Chiaki; Oguri, Masamune; Hamana, Takashi
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, Vol. 71, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/pasj/psz010

Beyond linear galaxy alignments
journal, November 2019


Integrated cosmological probes: Extended analysis
journal, April 2017


Looking through the same lens: Shear calibration for LSST, Euclid, and WFIRST with stage 4 CMB lensing
journal, June 2017


Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Galaxy-galaxy lensing
journal, August 2018


Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear
journal, August 2018


Exploring the Brighter-fatter Effect with the Hyper Suprime-Cam
journal, May 2018

  • Coulton, William R.; Armstrong, Robert; Smith, Kendrick M.
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 155, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/aac08d

Practical Weak-lensing Shear Measurement with Metacalibration
journal, May 2017


Removing the Impact of Correlated PSF Uncertainties in Weak Lensing
journal, May 2018


Galaxy–Galaxy Weak-lensing Measurements from SDSS. II. Host Halo Properties of Galaxy Groups
journal, July 2018


Stellar Streams Discovered in the Dark Energy Survey
journal, July 2018


Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Detection of Intracluster Light at Redshift ∼ 0.25
journal, April 2019


Hierarchical Modeling and Statistical Calibration for Photometric Redshifts
journal, August 2019

  • Leistedt, Boris; Hogg, David W.; Wechsler, Risa H.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 881, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2d29

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: The Photometric Data Set for Cosmology
journal, April 2018

  • Drlica-Wagner, A.; Sevilla-Noarbe, I.; Rykoff, E. S.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 235, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f5

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Photometric Data Set for Cosmology
text, January 2018

  • Drlica-Wagner, A.; Sevilla-Noarbe, I.; Rykoff, Es
  • Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
  • DOI: 10.17863/cam.21145

The effect of detector nonlinearity on WFIRST PSF profiles for weak gravitational lensing measurements
text, January 2016


Radio-Optical Galaxy Shape Correlations in the COSMOS Field
text, January 2016


Practical Weak Lensing Shear Measurement with Metacalibration
text, January 2017


The Hyper Suprime-Cam Software Pipeline
text, January 2017


Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Photometric Data Set for Cosmology
text, January 2017


Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing
text, January 2017


Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cosmic Shear
text, January 2017


Exploring the brighter fatter effect with the Hyper Suprime-Cam
text, January 2017


Removing the Impact of Correlated PSF Uncertainties in Weak Lensing
text, January 2017


Hierarchical modeling and statistical calibration for photometric redshifts
text, January 2018


Gravitational lensing detection of an extremely dense environment around a galaxy cluster
preprint, January 2018


A Unified Analysis of Four Cosmic Shear Surveys
text, January 2018


Cosmology from cosmic shear power spectra with Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam first-year data
text, January 2018


Galaxy shape measurement with convolutional neural networks
text, January 2019


A new sample of southern radio galaxies: Host galaxy masses and star-formation rates
text, January 2019


Cosmological model discrimination with Deep Learning
preprint, January 2017


Gravitational lensing detection of an extremely dense environment around a galaxy cluster
preprint, January 2018