skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Do Nuclear Star Clusters and Supermassive Black Holes Follow the Same Host-Galaxy Correlations?

Abstract

Studies have suggested that there is a strong correlation between the masses of nuclear star clusters (NSCs) and their host galaxies, a correlation which is said to be an extension of the well-known correlations between supermassive black holes (SMBHs) and their host galaxies. But careful analysis of disk galaxies—including 2D bulge/disk/bar decompositions—shows that while SMBHs correlate with the stellar mass of the bulge component of galaxies, the masses of NSCs correlate much better with the total galaxy stellar mass. In addition, the mass ratio M NSC / M ,  tot for NSCs in spirals (at least those with Hubble types Sc and later) is typically an order of magnitude smaller than the mass ratio M BH / M ,  bul of SMBHs. The absence of a universal “central massive object” correlation argues against common formation and growth mechanisms for both SMBHs and NSCs. We also discuss evidence for a break in the NSC-host galaxy correlation, galaxies with Hubble types earlier than Sbc appear to host systematically more massive NSCs than do types Sc and later.

Authors:
 [1];  [2]
  1. Max-Planck-Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstraβe, 85748 Garching, Germany, Universitäts-Sternwarte München, Scheinerstraβe 1, 81679 München, Germany
  2. European Southern Observatory, Alonso de Cordova 3107, Vitacura, Casilla 19001, Santiago 19, Chile
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1209641
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Advances in Astronomy
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Advances in Astronomy Journal Volume: 2012; Journal ID: ISSN 1687-7969
Publisher:
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Country of Publication:
Country unknown/Code not available
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Erwin, Peter, and Gadotti, Dimitri Alexei. Do Nuclear Star Clusters and Supermassive Black Holes Follow the Same Host-Galaxy Correlations?. Country unknown/Code not available: N. p., 2012. Web. doi:10.1155/2012/946368.
Erwin, Peter, & Gadotti, Dimitri Alexei. Do Nuclear Star Clusters and Supermassive Black Holes Follow the Same Host-Galaxy Correlations?. Country unknown/Code not available. doi:10.1155/2012/946368.
Erwin, Peter, and Gadotti, Dimitri Alexei. Sun . "Do Nuclear Star Clusters and Supermassive Black Holes Follow the Same Host-Galaxy Correlations?". Country unknown/Code not available. doi:10.1155/2012/946368.
@article{osti_1209641,
title = {Do Nuclear Star Clusters and Supermassive Black Holes Follow the Same Host-Galaxy Correlations?},
author = {Erwin, Peter and Gadotti, Dimitri Alexei},
abstractNote = {Studies have suggested that there is a strong correlation between the masses of nuclear star clusters (NSCs) and their host galaxies, a correlation which is said to be an extension of the well-known correlations between supermassive black holes (SMBHs) and their host galaxies. But careful analysis of disk galaxies—including 2D bulge/disk/bar decompositions—shows that while SMBHs correlate with the stellar mass of the bulge component of galaxies, the masses of NSCs correlate much better with the total galaxy stellar mass. In addition, the mass ratio M NSC / M ⋆ ,  tot for NSCs in spirals (at least those with Hubble types Sc and later) is typically an order of magnitude smaller than the mass ratio M BH / M ⋆ ,  bul of SMBHs. The absence of a universal “central massive object” correlation argues against common formation and growth mechanisms for both SMBHs and NSCs. We also discuss evidence for a break in the NSC-host galaxy correlation, galaxies with Hubble types earlier than Sbc appear to host systematically more massive NSCs than do types Sc and later.},
doi = {10.1155/2012/946368},
journal = {Advances in Astronomy},
number = ,
volume = 2012,
place = {Country unknown/Code not available},
year = {2012},
month = {1}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
DOI: 10.1155/2012/946368

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 13 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share: