skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Modeling the impact of agricultural land use and management on US carbon budgets

Abstract

Cultivation of the terrestrial land surface can create either a source or sink of atmospheric CO₂, depending on land management practices. The Community Land Model (CLM) provides a useful tool for exploring how land use and management impact the soil carbon pool at regional to global scales. CLM was recently updated to include representation of managed lands growing maize, soybean, and spring wheat. In this study, CLM-Crop is used to investigate the impacts of various management practices, including fertilizer use and differential rates of crop residue removal, on the soil organic carbon (SOC) storage of croplands in the continental United States over approximately a 170-year period. Results indicate that total US SOC stocks have already lost over 8 Pg C (10%) due to land cultivation practices (e.g., fertilizer application, cultivar choice, and residue removal), compared to a land surface composed of native vegetation (i.e., grasslands). After long periods of cultivation, individual subgrids (the equivalent of a field plot) growing maize and soybean lost up to 65% of the carbon stored compared to a grassland site. Crop residue management showed the greatest effect on soil carbon storage, with low and medium residue returns resulting in additional losses of 5 and 3.5%,more » respectively, in US carbon storage, while plots with high residue returns stored 2% more carbon. Nitrogenous fertilizer can alter the amount of soil carbon stocks significantly. Under current levels of crop residue return, not applying fertilizer resulted in a 5% loss of soil carbon. Our simulations indicate that disturbance through cultivation will always result in a loss of soil carbon, and management practices will have a large influence on the magnitude of SOC loss.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [2];  [1];  [1]
  1. Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
  2. Northern Illinois Univ., DeKalb, IL (United States). Dept. of Geography.
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC); USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER) (SC-23), Earth System Modeling; National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC)
OSTI Identifier:
1197737
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1201739; OSTI ID: 1396278
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-06CH11357; AC02-05CH11231
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Biogeosciences (Online)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Biogeosciences (Online); Journal Volume: 12; Journal Issue: 7; Journal ID: ISSN 1726-4189
Publisher:
European Geosciences Union
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; Agriculture; Biogeochemistry; Soil Organic Carbon; land surface model

Citation Formats

Drewniak, B. A., Mishra, U., Song, J., Prell, J., and Kotamarthi, V. R. Modeling the impact of agricultural land use and management on US carbon budgets. United States: N. p., 2015. Web. doi:10.5194/bg-12-2119-2015.
Drewniak, B. A., Mishra, U., Song, J., Prell, J., & Kotamarthi, V. R. Modeling the impact of agricultural land use and management on US carbon budgets. United States. doi:10.5194/bg-12-2119-2015.
Drewniak, B. A., Mishra, U., Song, J., Prell, J., and Kotamarthi, V. R. Thu . "Modeling the impact of agricultural land use and management on US carbon budgets". United States. doi:10.5194/bg-12-2119-2015.
@article{osti_1197737,
title = {Modeling the impact of agricultural land use and management on US carbon budgets},
author = {Drewniak, B. A. and Mishra, U. and Song, J. and Prell, J. and Kotamarthi, V. R.},
abstractNote = {Cultivation of the terrestrial land surface can create either a source or sink of atmospheric CO₂, depending on land management practices. The Community Land Model (CLM) provides a useful tool for exploring how land use and management impact the soil carbon pool at regional to global scales. CLM was recently updated to include representation of managed lands growing maize, soybean, and spring wheat. In this study, CLM-Crop is used to investigate the impacts of various management practices, including fertilizer use and differential rates of crop residue removal, on the soil organic carbon (SOC) storage of croplands in the continental United States over approximately a 170-year period. Results indicate that total US SOC stocks have already lost over 8 Pg C (10%) due to land cultivation practices (e.g., fertilizer application, cultivar choice, and residue removal), compared to a land surface composed of native vegetation (i.e., grasslands). After long periods of cultivation, individual subgrids (the equivalent of a field plot) growing maize and soybean lost up to 65% of the carbon stored compared to a grassland site. Crop residue management showed the greatest effect on soil carbon storage, with low and medium residue returns resulting in additional losses of 5 and 3.5%, respectively, in US carbon storage, while plots with high residue returns stored 2% more carbon. Nitrogenous fertilizer can alter the amount of soil carbon stocks significantly. Under current levels of crop residue return, not applying fertilizer resulted in a 5% loss of soil carbon. Our simulations indicate that disturbance through cultivation will always result in a loss of soil carbon, and management practices will have a large influence on the magnitude of SOC loss.},
doi = {10.5194/bg-12-2119-2015},
journal = {Biogeosciences (Online)},
number = 7,
volume = 12,
place = {United States},
year = {2015},
month = {4}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
DOI: 10.5194/bg-12-2119-2015

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 6 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share: