U.S. Department of EnergyOffice of Scientific and Technical Information
Baseline vs. DER Scenario
Abstract
Projections and associated uncertainty estimates are generated for a variety of user-selectable EV charging sessions, electricity tariffs, subsidy levels, revenue schemes, charging station configurations, and on-site solar and/or storage options. The outputs are presented in CHIP's web portal browser in the form of easily interpretable graphics (interactive graphs and bar charts) that facilitate convenient comparison among different scenarios to aid decision-making. The user should bring assumptions for modeling on simulation planning horizon, number of EV charging sessions per year, electricity costs (energy and demand charge rates; flat versus time-of-use rate), site capital costs (equipment for EV chargers and transformer), solar PV, and battery energy storage (kW).
- Authors:
-
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
- Publication Date:
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC05-76RL01830
- Research Org.:
- National Renewable Energy Laboratory; Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; Idaho National Laboratory
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Transportation Office. Vehicle Technologies Office (EE-3V)
- Subject:
- 32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION
- OSTI Identifier:
- 2571850
- DOI:
- https://doi.org/10.15483/2571850
Citation Formats
Vlachokostas, Alex. Baseline vs. DER Scenario. United States: N. p., 2025.
Web. doi:10.15483/2571850.
Vlachokostas, Alex. Baseline vs. DER Scenario. United States. doi:https://doi.org/10.15483/2571850
Vlachokostas, Alex. 2025.
"Baseline vs. DER Scenario". United States. doi:https://doi.org/10.15483/2571850. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/2571850. Pub date:Tue Jul 15 00:00:00 EDT 2025
@article{osti_2571850,
title = {Baseline vs. DER Scenario},
author = {Vlachokostas, Alex},
abstractNote = {Projections and associated uncertainty estimates are generated for a variety of user-selectable EV charging sessions, electricity tariffs, subsidy levels, revenue schemes, charging station configurations, and on-site solar and/or storage options. The outputs are presented in CHIP's web portal browser in the form of easily interpretable graphics (interactive graphs and bar charts) that facilitate convenient comparison among different scenarios to aid decision-making. The user should bring assumptions for modeling on simulation planning horizon, number of EV charging sessions per year, electricity costs (energy and demand charge rates; flat versus time-of-use rate), site capital costs (equipment for EV chargers and transformer), solar PV, and battery energy storage (kW).},
doi = {10.15483/2571850},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Jul 15 00:00:00 EDT 2025},
month = {Tue Jul 15 00:00:00 EDT 2025}
}