U.S. Department of EnergyOffice of Scientific and Technical Information
Utah FORGE: Well 16B(78)-32 Drill Core Fracture Analysis Images and Data
Abstract
This dataset contains drilling core data from well 16B(78)-32, including PDF documents with flattened core images annotated by feature type and core interval, as well as spreadsheets detailing feature morphologies by depth, planar feature measurements, and planar feature orientations rotated to in situ conditions. Core was recovered from three intervals, one per stimulation stage, in the crystalline rocks affected by the stimulation of well 16A(78)-32. Seven core runs were conducted, yielding 135.8 feet of recovered core. Features in the core were categorized into planar fractures, semi-planar fractures, unbroken mineralized fractures, rough fractures, curviplanar fractures, concave-convex surfaces, and planar compositional features such as mylonite or dike-like structures. Planar features were measured while the core was positioned horizontally, with the core axis aligned to a downhole azimuth of 42 degrees. Planar core measurements from stimulations 2 and 3 that could be confidently correlated with FMI data were rotated to in situ orientations. This was done by rotating the planes along vertical and horizontal axes to match the azimuth and inclination data recorded in the directional survey of well 16B(78)-32, as well as applying an axial rotation to resemble the fracture orientations observed in the FMI log at corresponding depths. Coherent sets ofmore »
- Authors:
-
- Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
- Publication Date:
- Other Number(s):
- 1708
- DOE Contract Number:
- EE0007080
- Research Org.:
- DOE Geothermal Data Repository; Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Renewable Power Office. Geothermal Technologies Program (EE-4G)
- Collaborations:
- Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah
- Subject:
- 15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY; 16B78-32; 16B78-32 core; EGS; FMI; Utah FORGE; Well 16B78-32; Well 16B78-32 core; Well 16B78-32 core fracture analysis; core; core fracture analysis; core images; core measurements; crystalline rock; drill core fracture analysis; drilling core; drilling core data; energy; feature morphology; fracture characterization; fracture stages; geothermal; imaging; planar features; stimulation
- OSTI Identifier:
- 2516749
- DOI:
- https://doi.org/10.15121/2516749
Citation Formats
Jones, Clay. Utah FORGE: Well 16B(78)-32 Drill Core Fracture Analysis Images and Data. United States: N. p., 2025.
Web. doi:10.15121/2516749.
Jones, Clay. Utah FORGE: Well 16B(78)-32 Drill Core Fracture Analysis Images and Data. United States. doi:https://doi.org/10.15121/2516749
Jones, Clay. 2025.
"Utah FORGE: Well 16B(78)-32 Drill Core Fracture Analysis Images and Data". United States. doi:https://doi.org/10.15121/2516749. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/2516749. Pub date:Wed Jan 29 04:00:00 UTC 2025
@article{osti_2516749,
title = {Utah FORGE: Well 16B(78)-32 Drill Core Fracture Analysis Images and Data},
author = {Jones, Clay},
abstractNote = {This dataset contains drilling core data from well 16B(78)-32, including PDF documents with flattened core images annotated by feature type and core interval, as well as spreadsheets detailing feature morphologies by depth, planar feature measurements, and planar feature orientations rotated to in situ conditions. Core was recovered from three intervals, one per stimulation stage, in the crystalline rocks affected by the stimulation of well 16A(78)-32. Seven core runs were conducted, yielding 135.8 feet of recovered core. Features in the core were categorized into planar fractures, semi-planar fractures, unbroken mineralized fractures, rough fractures, curviplanar fractures, concave-convex surfaces, and planar compositional features such as mylonite or dike-like structures. Planar features were measured while the core was positioned horizontally, with the core axis aligned to a downhole azimuth of 42 degrees. Planar core measurements from stimulations 2 and 3 that could be confidently correlated with FMI data were rotated to in situ orientations. This was done by rotating the planes along vertical and horizontal axes to match the azimuth and inclination data recorded in the directional survey of well 16B(78)-32, as well as applying an axial rotation to resemble the fracture orientations observed in the FMI log at corresponding depths. Coherent sets of planar fracture measurements were made by aligning the core within each 3-foot section of the dissected core barrel, and between adjacent 3-foot sections within a core run by matching rock fabrics, saw cuts and/or tool marks. Where coherent fracture measurements could not be made within a core run, data sets are denoted by a subscript (i.e. 2-Ta and 2-Tb both come from tangent core run number 2).},
doi = {10.15121/2516749},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Jan 29 04:00:00 UTC 2025},
month = {Wed Jan 29 04:00:00 UTC 2025}
}