DOE Data Explorer title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Navigating Epistemic Uncertainty in the Management of Flash Droughts

Abstract

Abstract: Flash droughts, characterized by their rapid onset, sharply contrast with the typically gradual development of traditional droughts. These events are triggered by a combination of low rainfall and high evaporation rates, driven by elevated temperatures, making them particularly challenging to predict and prepare for. As a relatively new concept, flash drought is not well understood, which introduces significant epistemic uncertainties regarding their nature and detection methods. This under-detection hinders planners' ability to effectively manage these events. Despite these uncertainties, flash droughts can have significant impacts, raising the question: how can decision-makers prepare for such events given the current knowledge gaps? To address this, we propose a methodological framework aimed at enhancing flash drought preparedness by guiding the selection of appropriate indicators based on their detection capabilities and the decision-makers' level of risk aversion. Our approach involves evaluating six different flash drought indicators and analyzing the level of agreement among them. Additionally, we consider the decision-makers' risk aversion, distinguishing between those who require consensus across all methods (risk-takers) and those who act based on a single method's indication (risk-averse). The insights gained from this study offer a pathway towards more informed decision-making processes regarding flash droughts, potentially mitigating their adversemore » effects through better preparedness and response strategies.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo ; ORCiD logo
  1. Pennsylvania State University; Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
  2. Pennsylvania State University
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
MultiSector Dynamics - Living, Intuitive, Value-adding, Environment
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
Subject:
Decision-making framework; Epistemic uncertainty; climate resilience; drought impact
OSTI Identifier:
2500385
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57931/2500385

Citation Formats

Gabriela, Gesualdo, and Antonia, Hadjimichael. Navigating Epistemic Uncertainty in the Management of Flash Droughts. United States: N. p., 2025. Web. doi:10.57931/2500385.
Gabriela, Gesualdo, & Antonia, Hadjimichael. Navigating Epistemic Uncertainty in the Management of Flash Droughts. United States. doi:https://doi.org/10.57931/2500385
Gabriela, Gesualdo, and Antonia, Hadjimichael. 2025. "Navigating Epistemic Uncertainty in the Management of Flash Droughts". United States. doi:https://doi.org/10.57931/2500385. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/2500385. Pub date:Wed Jan 15 04:00:00 UTC 2025
@article{osti_2500385,
title = {Navigating Epistemic Uncertainty in the Management of Flash Droughts},
author = {Gabriela, Gesualdo and Antonia, Hadjimichael},
abstractNote = {Abstract: Flash droughts, characterized by their rapid onset, sharply contrast with the typically gradual development of traditional droughts. These events are triggered by a combination of low rainfall and high evaporation rates, driven by elevated temperatures, making them particularly challenging to predict and prepare for. As a relatively new concept, flash drought is not well understood, which introduces significant epistemic uncertainties regarding their nature and detection methods. This under-detection hinders planners' ability to effectively manage these events. Despite these uncertainties, flash droughts can have significant impacts, raising the question: how can decision-makers prepare for such events given the current knowledge gaps? To address this, we propose a methodological framework aimed at enhancing flash drought preparedness by guiding the selection of appropriate indicators based on their detection capabilities and the decision-makers' level of risk aversion. Our approach involves evaluating six different flash drought indicators and analyzing the level of agreement among them. Additionally, we consider the decision-makers' risk aversion, distinguishing between those who require consensus across all methods (risk-takers) and those who act based on a single method's indication (risk-averse). The insights gained from this study offer a pathway towards more informed decision-making processes regarding flash droughts, potentially mitigating their adverse effects through better preparedness and response strategies.},
doi = {10.57931/2500385},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Jan 15 04:00:00 UTC 2025},
month = {Wed Jan 15 04:00:00 UTC 2025}
}