Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Topical Report

Moore, Joseph; Simmons, Stuart; McLennan, John; Jones, Clay; Skowron, Gosia; Wannamaker, Phil; Nash, Greg; Hardwick, Christian; Hurlbut, Will; Allis, Rick; Kirby, Stephan; Erickson, Ben; Feigl, Kurt; Batzli, Sam; Miller, John; Witter, Jeff; Podgorney, Rob; Pankow, Kristine; Reinisch, Elena; Patel, Vivek; Martin, Taylor; Rutledge, Jim; McKean, Adam

doi:10.15121/1578287

Title: Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Topical Report

Dataset
Other Related Research

Abstract

This is the topical report that wraps up the work and results achieved during Utah FORGE Phase 2C. The zip file includes several folders containing (1) an overview; (2) the results; (3) the lessons learned; and (4) the conclusions. It also contains a folder containing appendices including (1) the updated permitting inventory; (2) the updated site characterization data inventory; (3) the updated conceptual geological model; and (4) the stakeholders engagement and outreach status.

Publication Date:: Tue Dec 10 23:00:00 EST 2019

Other Number(s):: 1187

DOE Contract Number:: EE0007080

Research Org.:: DOE Geothermal Data Repository; Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah

Sponsoring Org.:: USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Geothermal Technologies Program (EE-2C)

Collaborations:: Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah

Subject:: 15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY; DAS; Distributed Acoustic Sensing; EGS; FORGE; INSaR; Injection testing; Milford; Phase 2C Topical Report; Roosevelt Hot Springs; Utah FORGE; Utah FORGE Phase 2C; Utah FORGE Phase 2C Report; alluvium-granitoid; characterization; conceptual; conclusions; data inventory; energy; feasibility; geologic; geology; geophysics; geothermal; gravity; gravity measurements; injection test; learned; lessons; microseismic; microseismicity; model; modeling; moderate rate injection tests; numerical reservoir models; overview; permitting; remote sensing; results; seismic; seismic reflection survey; site; stimulated; stimulation; technical

OSTI Identifier:: 1578287

DOI:: https://doi.org/10.15121/1578287

Citation Formats


                    Moore, Joseph, Simmons, Stuart, McLennan, John, Jones, Clay, Skowron, Gosia, Wannamaker, Phil, Nash, Greg, Hardwick, Christian, Hurlbut, Will, Allis, Rick, Kirby, Stephan, Erickson, Ben, Feigl, Kurt, Batzli, Sam, Miller, John, Witter, Jeff, Podgorney, Rob, Pankow, Kristine, Reinisch, Elena, Patel, Vivek, Martin, Taylor, Rutledge, Jim, and McKean, Adam. Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Topical Report.  United States: N. p., 2019. 
        Web.  doi:10.15121/1578287.

Copy to clipboard


                    Moore, Joseph, Simmons, Stuart, McLennan, John, Jones, Clay, Skowron, Gosia, Wannamaker, Phil, Nash, Greg, Hardwick, Christian, Hurlbut, Will, Allis, Rick, Kirby, Stephan, Erickson, Ben, Feigl, Kurt, Batzli, Sam, Miller, John, Witter, Jeff, Podgorney, Rob, Pankow, Kristine, Reinisch, Elena, Patel, Vivek, Martin, Taylor, Rutledge, Jim, & McKean, Adam. Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Topical Report.  United States.  doi:https://doi.org/10.15121/1578287

Copy to clipboard


                    Moore, Joseph, Simmons, Stuart, McLennan, John, Jones, Clay, Skowron, Gosia, Wannamaker, Phil, Nash, Greg, Hardwick, Christian, Hurlbut, Will, Allis, Rick, Kirby, Stephan, Erickson, Ben, Feigl, Kurt, Batzli, Sam, Miller, John, Witter, Jeff, Podgorney, Rob, Pankow, Kristine, Reinisch, Elena, Patel, Vivek, Martin, Taylor, Rutledge, Jim, and McKean, Adam. 2019.  
"Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Topical Report".  United States.  doi:https://doi.org/10.15121/1578287.  https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1578287. Pub date:Tue Dec 10 23:00:00 EST 2019

Copy to clipboard


                    
@article{osti_1578287,

  title        = {Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Topical Report},

  author       = {Moore, Joseph and Simmons, Stuart and McLennan, John and Jones, Clay and Skowron, Gosia and Wannamaker, Phil and Nash, Greg and Hardwick, Christian and Hurlbut, Will and Allis, Rick and Kirby, Stephan and Erickson, Ben and Feigl, Kurt and Batzli, Sam and Miller, John and Witter, Jeff and Podgorney, Rob and Pankow, Kristine and Reinisch, Elena and Patel, Vivek and Martin, Taylor and Rutledge, Jim and McKean, Adam},

  abstractNote = {This is the topical report that wraps up the work and results achieved during Utah FORGE Phase 2C. The zip file includes several folders containing (1) an overview; (2) the results; (3) the lessons learned; and (4) the conclusions. It also contains a folder containing appendices including (1) the updated permitting inventory; (2) the updated site characterization data inventory; (3) the updated conceptual geological model; and (4) the stakeholders engagement and outreach status.},

  doi          = {10.15121/1578287},

  journal      = {},

  number       = ,

  volume       = ,

  place        = {United States},

  year         = {Tue Dec 10 23:00:00 EST 2019},

  month        = {Tue Dec 10 23:00:00 EST 2019}

}

Copy to clipboard

Dataset:

View Dataset

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15121/1578287

Save / Share:

Export Metadata

Save to My Library

Similar records in DOE Data Explorer and OSTI.GOV collections:

Utah FORGE: Updated Phase 2C Well Location Coordinates

Dataset Hardwick, Christian

Utah FORGE has been established to develop, test, and improve the technologies and techniques required to develop EGS-type geothermal resources. Drilling of the first of two deep deviated wells, 16A(78)-32, will begin in the second half of 2020. This well will serve as the injection well for the injection-production well pair that will form the heart of the laboratory. This submission contains an archive of well location data within the Roosevelt Hot Springs geothermal area. An Excel spreadsheet is included containing updated GPS data for Utah FORGE wells drilled during Phase 2C (56-32, 68-32, 78-32). This data was collected overmore »« less
Utah FORGE: Updated Phase 2C Well Location Coordinates

Dataset Hardwick, Christian

Utah FORGE has been established to develop, test, and improve the technologies and techniques required to develop EGS-type geothermal resources. Drilling of the first of two deep deviated wells, 16A(78)-32, will begin in the second half of 2020. This well will serve as the injection well for the injection-production well pair that will form the heart of the laboratory. This submission contains an archive of well location data within the Roosevelt Hot Springs geothermal area. An Excel spreadsheet is included containing updated GPS data for Utah FORGE wells drilled during Phase 2C (56-32, 68-32, 78-32). This data was collected overmore »« less
Utah FORGE: Final Topical Report 2018

Dataset Moore, Joe ; Allis, Rick ; Simmons, Stuart Simmons ; ...

This is the final topical report for the Phase 2B Utah FORGE project, which is located near Roosevelt Hot Springs, Utah. This PDF format report details results associated with the conceptual geologic model, deep well 58-32, rock geomechanics, reservoir temperatures, seismic surveys, seismic monitoring, certainty, and NEPA. The report also provides an overview of all of the deliverables which were used to produce the results and full appendices.
Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Seismic Observation and Ground Water Well Data and Well Locations

Dataset Abraham, Sam ; Mann, Mary ; Curtis, T. ; ...

This submission contains the following data associated with Utah FORGE Phase 2C within the Roosevelt Hot Springs geothermal area: - An ArcGIS shapefile with well locations for wells 58-32, 78-32, 68-32, OH-3, OH-4, WOW-2, and WOW-3. Well 58-32 is the deep test well, wells 68-32 and 78-32 are seismic test wells, and the OH and WOW wells were used for ground water monitoring and temperature gradient logging. - Drilling reports, lithologic logs, daily drilling reports, cuttings logs, and drilling photos for seismic monitoring wells 78-32 and 68-32. - Raw and post-processing temperature logs for wells OH-3, OH-4, WOW-2, and WOW-4.more »« less
Utah FORGE: Phase 3 Microgravity Data

Dataset Hardwick, Christian

A 4D microgravity survey began in early 2019 in order to benchmark surface and subsurface elevations prior to Phase 3 drilling and stimulation campaigns. Microgravity stations are collocated with GPS deformation benchmarks and use the same location survey data. Surveys are undertaken on a quarterly basis. The focus of current activities is comparative analysis of GPS survey results and InSAR analysis (see GDR Submission 1251) to check seasonal variance and to evaluate possible changes in the groundwater elevation. The attached zip file contains a text file and an Excel spreadsheet containing Utah FORGE Phase 3 processed "final" microgravity data throughmore »« less

Similar Records