Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Topical Report

doi:10.15121/1578287

Title: Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Topical Report

Abstract

This is the topical report that wraps up the work and results achieved during Utah FORGE Phase 2C. The zip file includes several folders containing (1) an overview; (2) the results; (3) the lessons learned; and (4) the conclusions. It also contains a folder containing appendices including (1) the updated permitting inventory; (2) the updated site characterization data inventory; (3) the updated conceptual geological model; and (4) the stakeholders engagement and outreach status.

Publication Date:: 2019-12-11

Other Number(s):: 1187

DOE Contract Number:: EE0007080

Product Type:: Dataset

Research Org.:: DOE Geothermal Data Repository; Energy and Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah

Sponsoring Org.:: USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Geothermal Technologies Program (EE-2C)

Subject:: 15 Geothermal Energy

Keywords:: geothermal; energy; FORGE; Utah FORGE; Utah FORGE Phase 2C Report; Phase 2C Topical Report; Utah FORGE Phase 2C; EGS; moderate rate injection tests; microseismic; Distributed Acoustic Sensing; DAS; seismic reflection survey; gravity measurements; INSaR; stimulated; numerical reservoir models; alluvium-granitoid; Injection testing; Milford; Roosevelt Hot Springs; overview; results; lessons; learned; conclusions; permitting; characterization; site; data inventory; conceptual; geologic; model; geophysics; seismic; gravity; geology; feasibility; technical; injection test; microseismicity; remote sensing; modeling; stimulation

OSTI Identifier:: 1578287

DOI:: 10.15121/1578287

Citation Formats


                    Moore, Joseph, Simmons, Stuart, McLennan, John, Jones, Clay, Skowron, Gosia, Wannamaker, Phil, Nash, Greg, Hardwick, Christian, Hurlbut, Will, Allis, Rick, Kirby, Stephan, Erickson, Ben, Feigl, Kurt, Batzli, Sam, Miller, John, Witter, Jeff, Podgorney, Rob, Pankow, Kristine, Reinisch, Elena, Patel, Vivek, Martin, Taylor, Rutledge, Jim, and McKean, Adam. Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Topical Report.  United States: N. p., 2019. 
        Web.  doi:10.15121/1578287.

Copy to clipboard


                    Moore, Joseph, Simmons, Stuart, McLennan, John, Jones, Clay, Skowron, Gosia, Wannamaker, Phil, Nash, Greg, Hardwick, Christian, Hurlbut, Will, Allis, Rick, Kirby, Stephan, Erickson, Ben, Feigl, Kurt, Batzli, Sam, Miller, John, Witter, Jeff, Podgorney, Rob, Pankow, Kristine, Reinisch, Elena, Patel, Vivek, Martin, Taylor, Rutledge, Jim, & McKean, Adam. Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Topical Report.  United States.  doi:10.15121/1578287.

Copy to clipboard


                    Moore, Joseph, Simmons, Stuart, McLennan, John, Jones, Clay, Skowron, Gosia, Wannamaker, Phil, Nash, Greg, Hardwick, Christian, Hurlbut, Will, Allis, Rick, Kirby, Stephan, Erickson, Ben, Feigl, Kurt, Batzli, Sam, Miller, John, Witter, Jeff, Podgorney, Rob, Pankow, Kristine, Reinisch, Elena, Patel, Vivek, Martin, Taylor, Rutledge, Jim, and McKean, Adam. 2019.  
"Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Topical Report".  United States.  doi:10.15121/1578287.  https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1578287. Pub date:Wed Dec 11 00:00:00 EST 2019

Copy to clipboard


                    
@article{osti_1578287,

  title        = {Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Topical Report},

  author       = {Moore, Joseph and Simmons, Stuart and McLennan, John and Jones, Clay and Skowron, Gosia and Wannamaker, Phil and Nash, Greg and Hardwick, Christian and Hurlbut, Will and Allis, Rick and Kirby, Stephan and Erickson, Ben and Feigl, Kurt and Batzli, Sam and Miller, John and Witter, Jeff and Podgorney, Rob and Pankow, Kristine and Reinisch, Elena and Patel, Vivek and Martin, Taylor and Rutledge, Jim and McKean, Adam},

  abstractNote = {This is the topical report that wraps up the work and results achieved during Utah FORGE Phase 2C. The zip file includes several folders containing (1) an overview; (2) the results; (3) the lessons learned; and (4) the conclusions. It also contains a folder containing appendices including (1) the updated permitting inventory; (2) the updated site characterization data inventory; (3) the updated conceptual geological model; and (4) the stakeholders engagement and outreach status.},

  doi          = {10.15121/1578287},

  journal      = {},

  number       = ,

  volume       = ,

  place        = {United States},

  year         = {2019},

  month        = {12}

}

Copy to clipboard

Dataset:

View Dataset

DOI: 10.15121/1578287

Save / Share:

Export Metadata

Save to My Library

Geothermal Data Repository (GDR)

Anderson, Arlene ; Weers, Jon

The Geothermal Data Repository (GDR) is the submission point for all data collected from researchers funded by the U.S. Department of Energy's Geothermal Technologies Office (DOE GTO). The DOE GTO is providing access to its geothermal project information through the GDR. The GDR is powered by OpenEI, an energy information portal sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy and developed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL).

Similar records in DOE Data Explorer and OSTI.GOV collections:

Utah FORGE Updated Phase 2C Well Location Coordinates

Dataset Hardwick, Christian

Utah FORGE has been established to develop, test, and improve the technologies and techniques required to develop EGS-type geothermal resources. Drilling of the first of two deep deviated wells, 16A(78)-32, will begin in the second half of 2020. This well will serve as the injection well for the injection-production well pair that will form the heart of the laboratory. This submission contains an archive of well location data within the Roosevelt Hot Springs geothermal area. An Excel spreadsheet is included containing updated GPS data for Utah FORGE wells drilled during Phase 2C (56-32, 68-32, 78-32). This data was collected overmore »« less
Utah FORGE: Final Topical Report 2018

Dataset Moore, Joe ; Allis, Rick ; Simmons, Stuart Simmons ; ...

This is the final topical report for the Phase 2B Utah FORGE project, which is located near Roosevelt Hot Springs, Utah. This PDF format report details results associated with the conceptual geologic model, deep well 58-32, rock geomechanics, reservoir temperatures, seismic surveys, seismic monitoring, certainty, and NEPA. The report also provides an overview of all of the deliverables which were used to produce the results and full appendices.
Utah FORGE Phase 3 Magnetotelluric (MT) Data

Dataset Wannamaker, Phil

New high-quality tensor MT data at 122 sites, including the vertical magnetic field and utilizing ultra-remote referencing, have been acquired over the Utah FORGE project area. The results will be used to delineate the densities of faults and fractures in crystalline basement rocks, to define the heat sources, and to derive baseline 3D resistivity structure for later MT monitoring of temporal changes in resistivity structure following well stimulation in the EGS reservoir. There are three files here related to Utah FORGE magnetotelluric (MT) data acquisition and processing. The FORGE MT EDIs zip file contains the observed MT responses in industry-standardmore »« less
Utah FORGE Phase 3 Microgravity Data

Dataset Hardwick, Christian

A 4D microgravity survey began in early 2019 in order to benchmark surface and subsurface elevations prior to Phase 3 drilling and stimulation campaigns. Microgravity stations are collocated with GPS deformation benchmarks and use the same location survey data. Surveys are undertaken on a quarterly basis. The focus of current activities is comparative analysis of GPS survey results and InSAR analysis (see GDR Submission 1251) to check seasonal variance and to evaluate possible changes in the groundwater elevation. The attached zip file contains a text file and an Excel spreadsheet containing Utah FORGE Phase 3 processed "final" microgravity data throughmore »« less
Utah FORGE Phase 3 Ground Water Level Monitoring Data

Dataset Kirby, Stefan

This spreadsheet contains ground water level data from the Utah FORGE site as monitored from wells WOW-2 and WOW-3. The well locations are also provided as UTM, Zone 12, NAD83 coordinates.

Similar Records

Research Org:	National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Org:	USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Renewable Power Office. Geothermal Technologies Office