DOE Data Explorer title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Monthly Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions: Uncertainty of Emissions Gridded by On Degree Latitude by One Degree Longitude (Uncertainties, V.2016)

Abstract

The monthly, gridded fossil-fuel CO2 emissions uncertainty estimates from 1950-2013 provided in this database are derived from time series of global, regional, and national fossil-fuel CO2 emissions (Boden et al. 2016). Andres et al. (2016) describes the basic methodology in estimating the uncertainty in the (gridded fossil fuel data product ). This uncertainty is gridded at the same spatial and temporal scales as the mass magnitude maps. This gridded uncertainty includes uncertainty contributions from the spatial, temporal, proxy, and magnitude components used to create the magnitude map of FFCO2 emissions. Throughout this process, when assumptions had to be made or expert judgment employed, the general tendency in most cases was toward overestimating or increasing the magnitude of uncertainty.For access to the data files, click this link to the CDIAC data transition website: http://cdiac.ess-dive.lbl.gov/epubs/fossil_fuel_CO2_emissions_gridded_monthly_uncertainty_v2016.html

Authors:
;
  1. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center
Publication Date:
Other Number(s):
doi:10.3334/CDIAC/FFE.MONTHLYUNCERTAINTY.2016; cdiac:doi 10.3334/CDIAC/ffe.MonthlyUncertainty.2016
Research Org.:
Environmental System Science Data Infrastructure for a Virtual Ecosystem (ESS-DIVE) (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
U.S. DOE > Office of Science (SC) > Biological and Environmental Research (BER) (SC-23)
Collaborations:
Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC)
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Keywords:
Gridded monthly fossil fuel CO2 emissions; Gridded monthly uncertainty estimates of fossil fuel CO2 emissions; Gridded fossil fuel carbon emissions; Latitude; Longitude; Isomass of Emissions; isotopic fossil-fuel CO2 emissions; carbon dioxide emission estimates; del 13C; DB1013; db1013; uncertainty of monthly gridded fossil fuel emissions; latitude; longitude
Geolocation:
83.5,179.5|-55.5,179.5|-55.5,-179.5|83.5,-179.5|83.5,179.5
OSTI Identifier:
1389464
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/FFE.MONTHLYUNCERTAINTY.2016
Project Location:

DOE DataExplorer Dataset Location Google Map

Citation Formats

Andres, R. J., and Boden, T. A. Monthly Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions: Uncertainty of Emissions Gridded by On Degree Latitude by One Degree Longitude (Uncertainties, V.2016). United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.3334/CDIAC/FFE.MONTHLYUNCERTAINTY.2016.
Andres, R. J., & Boden, T. A. Monthly Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions: Uncertainty of Emissions Gridded by On Degree Latitude by One Degree Longitude (Uncertainties, V.2016). United States. doi:https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/FFE.MONTHLYUNCERTAINTY.2016
Andres, R. J., and Boden, T. A. 2016. "Monthly Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions: Uncertainty of Emissions Gridded by On Degree Latitude by One Degree Longitude (Uncertainties, V.2016)". United States. doi:https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/FFE.MONTHLYUNCERTAINTY.2016. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1389464. Pub date:Mon Jul 11 00:00:00 EDT 2016
@article{osti_1389464,
title = {Monthly Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions: Uncertainty of Emissions Gridded by On Degree Latitude by One Degree Longitude (Uncertainties, V.2016)},
author = {Andres, R. J. and Boden, T. A.},
abstractNote = {The monthly, gridded fossil-fuel CO2 emissions uncertainty estimates from 1950-2013 provided in this database are derived from time series of global, regional, and national fossil-fuel CO2 emissions (Boden et al. 2016). Andres et al. (2016) describes the basic methodology in estimating the uncertainty in the (gridded fossil fuel data product ). This uncertainty is gridded at the same spatial and temporal scales as the mass magnitude maps. This gridded uncertainty includes uncertainty contributions from the spatial, temporal, proxy, and magnitude components used to create the magnitude map of FFCO2 emissions. Throughout this process, when assumptions had to be made or expert judgment employed, the general tendency in most cases was toward overestimating or increasing the magnitude of uncertainty.For access to the data files, click this link to the CDIAC data transition website: http://cdiac.ess-dive.lbl.gov/epubs/fossil_fuel_CO2_emissions_gridded_monthly_uncertainty_v2016.html},
doi = {10.3334/CDIAC/FFE.MONTHLYUNCERTAINTY.2016},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {2016},
month = {7}
}