Exploration Gap Assessment (FY13 Update)

Esposito, Ariel; Young, Katherine R.; Getman, Dan; Thorsteinsson, Hidda

doi:10.15121/1261919

Title: Exploration Gap Assessment (FY13 Update)

Dataset
Other Related Research

Abstract

This submission contains an update to the previous Exploration Gap Assessment funded in 2012, which identify high potential hydrothermal areas where critical data are needed (gap analysis on exploration data). The uploaded data are contained in two data files for each data category: A shape (SHP) file containing the grid, and a data file (CSV) containing the individual layers that intersected with the grid. This CSV can be joined with the map to retrieve a list of datasets that are available at any given site. A grid of the contiguous U.S. was created with 88,000 10-km by 10-km grid cells, and each cell was populated with the status of data availability corresponding to five data types: 1. well data 2. geologic maps 3. fault maps 4. geochemistry data 5. geophysical data

Authors:: Esposito, Ariel; Young, Katherine R.; Getman, Dan; Thorsteinsson, Hidda

Publication Date:: 2013-09-30

Other Number(s):: 263

DOE Contract Number:: FY13 AOP 2.2

Research Org.:: USDOE Geothermal Data Repository (United States); National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)

Sponsoring Org.:: USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Renewable Power Office. Geothermal Technologies Program (EE-4G)

Collaborations:: National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Subject:: 15 Geothermal Energy

Keywords:: geothermal; shapefile; gap; nrel; gap assessment; ngds; national geothermal data system; geothermal prospector; well data; geologic maps; fault maps; geochemistry data; data coverage; data gaps; western US; dBase file; exploration; mineral; raw data; index file; geophysical; projection file; well; geologic; structure; structural maps; geochemistry; fault; paper; process; SGW; Stanford Geothermal Workshop; geospatial data

Geolocation:: 49.378264071349,-65.0816|24.906620000805,-65.0816|24.906620000805,-125.5392625|49.378264071349,-125.5392625|49.378264071349,-65.0816

OSTI Identifier:: 1261919

DOI:: https://doi.org/10.15121/1261919

Project Location:

Citation Formats


                    Esposito, Ariel, Young, Katherine R., Getman, Dan, and Thorsteinsson, Hidda. Exploration Gap Assessment (FY13 Update).  United States: N. p., 2013. 
        Web.  doi:10.15121/1261919.

Copy to clipboard


                    Esposito, Ariel, Young, Katherine R., Getman, Dan, & Thorsteinsson, Hidda. Exploration Gap Assessment (FY13 Update).  United States.  doi:https://doi.org/10.15121/1261919

Copy to clipboard


                    Esposito, Ariel, Young, Katherine R., Getman, Dan, and Thorsteinsson, Hidda. 2013.  
"Exploration Gap Assessment (FY13 Update)".  United States.  doi:https://doi.org/10.15121/1261919.  https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1261919. Pub date:Mon Sep 30 00:00:00 EDT 2013

Copy to clipboard


                    
@article{osti_1261919,

  title        = {Exploration Gap Assessment (FY13 Update)},

  author       = {Esposito, Ariel and Young, Katherine R. and Getman, Dan and Thorsteinsson, Hidda},

  abstractNote = {This submission contains an update to the previous Exploration Gap Assessment funded in 2012, which identify high potential hydrothermal areas where critical data are needed (gap analysis on exploration data). The uploaded data are contained in two data files for each data category: A shape (SHP) file containing the grid, and a data file (CSV) containing the individual layers that intersected with the grid. This CSV can be joined with the map to retrieve a list of datasets that are available at any given site. A grid of the contiguous U.S. was created with 88,000 10-km by 10-km grid cells, and each cell was populated with the status of data availability corresponding to five data types: 1. well data 2. geologic maps 3. fault maps 4. geochemistry data 5. geophysical data},

  doi          = {10.15121/1261919},

  journal      = {},

  number       = ,

  volume       = ,

  place        = {United States},

  year         = {2013},

  month        = {9}

}

Copy to clipboard

Dataset:

View Dataset

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15121/1261919

Save / Share:

Export Metadata

Save to My Library

Similar records in DOE Data Explorer and OSTI.GOV collections:

Gap Assessment (FY 13 Update)

Dataset Getman, Dan

To help guide its future data collection efforts, The DOE GTO funded a data gap analysis in FY2012 to identify high potential hydrothermal areas where critical data are needed. This analysis was updated in FY2013 and the resulting datasets are represented by this metadata. The original process was published in FY 2012 and is available here: https://pangea.stanford.edu/ERE/db/GeoConf/papers/SGW/2013/Esposito.pdf Though there are many types of data that can be used for hydrothermal exploration, five types of exploration data were targeted for this analysis. These data types were selected for their regional reconnaissance potential, and include many of the primary exploration techniques currentlymore »« less
Olson's Major World Ecosystem Complexes Ranked by Carbon in Live Vegetation: An Updated Database Using the GLC2000 Land Cover Product (NDP-017b, a 2006 update of the original 1985 and 2001 data file)

Dataset Gibbs, Holly K.

In the 1980s, Olson et al. developed a data base and corresponding map following more than 20 years of field investigations, consultations, and analyses of published literature. The original data characterize the use and vegetative cover of the Earth's land surface with a 0.5° by 0.5° grid. The purpose of these world-ecosystem-complex data and the accompanying map were to provide a current reference base for interpreting the role of vegetation in the global cycling of CO2 and other gases and a basis for improved estimates of vegetation and soil carbon, of natural exchanges of CO2, and of net historic shiftsmore »« less
Update on Geothermal Direct-Use Installations in the United States

Dataset Beckers, Koenraad F. ; Snyder, Diana M. ; Young, Katherine R.

An updated database of geothermal direct-use systems in the U.S. has been compiled and analyzed, building upon the Oregon Institute of Technology (OIT) Geo-Heat Center direct-use database. Types of direct-use applications examined include hot springs resorts and pools, aquaculture farms, greenhouses, and district heating systems, among others; power-generating facilities and ground-source heat pumps were excluded. Where possible, the current operation status, open and close dates, well data, and other technical data were obtained for each entry. The database contains 545 installations, of which 407 are open, 108 are closed, and 30 have an unknown status. A report is also includedmore »« less
2018 Annual Technology Baseline ATB Cost and Performance Data for Electricity Generation Technologies - Interim Data Without Geothermal Updates

Dataset Augustine, Chad ; Beiter, Philipp ; Cole, Wesley ; ...

Each year since 2015 NREL has presented Annual Technology Baseline ATB in a workbook that contains detailed cost and performance data both current and projected for renewable and conventional technologies. The workbook includes a spreadsheet for each technology. This workbook provides data for the 2018 ATB. Geothermal updates await publication of GeoVision.In this edition of the ATB two financial assumptions cases are provided 1 effects of research and development alone 2 effects of research and development as well as market conditions.
Utah FORGE Updated Well, Well Pad, and Seismic Station GPS Coordinates December, 2021

Dataset Erickson, Ben

This is a CSV spreadsheet containing UTM and Latitude and Longitude coordinates and elevations for Wells 78-32, 78B-32, 56-32, 58-32, 68-32, and 16A(78)-32 and seismic stations BOR1, BOR2, BOR3, FOR1, FOR2, FOR5, FOR6, FOR 7, FOR8, FORK, FORU, FORW, and FORB. These are from a GPS survey conducted by the Utah Geological Survey completed in December, 2021.

Similar Records