Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

A study of potential sources of linguistic ambiguity in written work instructions.

Technical Report ·
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/976942· OSTI ID:976942

This report describes the results of a small experimental study that investigated potential sources of ambiguity in written work instructions (WIs). The English language can be highly ambiguous because words with different meanings can share the same spelling. Previous studies in the nuclear weapons complex have shown that ambiguous WIs can lead to human error, which is a major cause for concern. To study possible sources of ambiguity in WIs, we determined which of the recommended action verbs in the DOE and BWXT writer's manuals have numerous meanings to their intended audience, making them potentially ambiguous. We used cognitive psychology techniques to conduct a survey in which technicians who use WIs in their jobs indicated the first meaning that came to mind for each of the words. Although the findings of this study are limited by the small number of respondents, we identified words that had many different meanings even within this limited sample. WI writers should pay particular attention to these words and to their most frequent meanings so that they can avoid ambiguity in their writing.

Research Organization:
Sandia National Laboratories
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
DOE Contract Number:
AC04-94AL85000
OSTI ID:
976942
Report Number(s):
SAND2009-7525
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Recommendations for reducing ambiguity in written procedures.
Technical Report · Sun Nov 01 00:00:00 EDT 2009 · OSTI ID:976943

INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH MANUAL
Technical Report · Thu Feb 21 23:00:00 EST 2002 · OSTI ID:808088

Activation of extrastriate and frontal cortical areas by visual words and word-like stimuli
Journal Article · Fri Aug 31 00:00:00 EDT 1990 · Science (Washington, D.C.); (USA) · OSTI ID:6368856