skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: A Case for Employing Near-field Measurements to Detect Important Effluents from Nuclear Material Processing Operations

Abstract

General discussion of effluents from nuclear material reprocessing operations and the opportunity to detect important effluents in the near-field domain.

Authors:
; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
921584
Report Number(s):
PNNL-16393
NN2001000; TRN: US0802044
DOE Contract Number:
AC05-76RL01830
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS; 45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEFENSE; ATOMS; CHEMICAL EFFLUENTS; COMPLIANCE; DETECTION; MONITORING; NUCLEAR FUELS; NUCLEAR WEAPONS; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY; PLUMES; PLUTONIUM; PROBABILITY; PROLIFERATION; PUREX PROCESS; REPROCESSING; RESIDUES; SECURITY; SOILS; TARGETS; URANIUM; Nuclear material processing effluent detection, semi-volatile chemicals

Citation Formats

Hartman, John S., Kelly, James F., and Birnbaum, Jerome C.. A Case for Employing Near-field Measurements to Detect Important Effluents from Nuclear Material Processing Operations. United States: N. p., 2007. Web. doi:10.2172/921584.
Hartman, John S., Kelly, James F., & Birnbaum, Jerome C.. A Case for Employing Near-field Measurements to Detect Important Effluents from Nuclear Material Processing Operations. United States. doi:10.2172/921584.
Hartman, John S., Kelly, James F., and Birnbaum, Jerome C.. Wed . "A Case for Employing Near-field Measurements to Detect Important Effluents from Nuclear Material Processing Operations". United States. doi:10.2172/921584. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/921584.
@article{osti_921584,
title = {A Case for Employing Near-field Measurements to Detect Important Effluents from Nuclear Material Processing Operations},
author = {Hartman, John S. and Kelly, James F. and Birnbaum, Jerome C.},
abstractNote = {General discussion of effluents from nuclear material reprocessing operations and the opportunity to detect important effluents in the near-field domain.},
doi = {10.2172/921584},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Jan 31 00:00:00 EST 2007},
month = {Wed Jan 31 00:00:00 EST 2007}
}

Technical Report:

Save / Share:
  • This guide provides methods acceptable to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff for developing effluent monitoring programs to be described in license applications and for monitoring and reporting effluent data by licensees. The guidance is applicable to nuclear fuel processing and fabrication plants and uranium hexafluoride production plants.
  • Several potential incident scenarios involving the accidental release of radioactive material at five reference, nonreactor nuclear material licensees are analyzed in this report. The economic risk ($/licensee/yr) of decontamination is evaluated for each reference licensee. Although most releases and cleanup costs are minor, some less frequent incidents may result in very high cleanup costs that dominate the economic risk of decontamination of a particular licensee. The economic risk for the 5 plants ranged from a low of $14,000 per licensee per year to a high of $104,000 per licensee per year. This report is the second of two reports bymore » Sandia National Laboratories on the economic risk of nonreactor nuclear material licensee operations. 40 refs., 21 figs., 31 tabs.« less
  • The objective of this research project is to analyze the trace elements in gaseous and liquid effluents and wastes from fossil fueled power plants in order to assess the emissions at different stages of the fossil (especially coal) fuel cycle and to compare these with nuclear fuel cycle effluents and wastes. The emphasis is on effluents of radiological significance (primarily uranium and thorium) so as to obtain a basis for the comprehensive evaluation of the health effects and total engineering and social costs associated with these fuel cycles. During the first quarter, effort has been primarily directed toward project organization,more » literature searches, sample preparation and treatment techniques, identification of sample sites, planning for the acquisition of several types of environmental samples, instrumentation development, and evaluation of trace element assay techniques. Preliminary analysis has been performed using some initial test samples.« less
  • A cost/benefit study was made to determine the cost and effectiveness of radioactive waste (radwaste) treatment systems for decreasing the release of radioactive materials from a model nuclear fuel reprocessing plant which processes light-water reactor (LWR) fuels, and to determine the radiological impact (dose commitment) of the released materials on the environment. The study is designed to assist in defining the term as low as reasonably achievable in relation to limiting the release of radioactive materials from nuclear facilities. The base case model plant is representative of current plant technology and has an annual capacity of 1500 metric tons ofmore » LWR fuel. Additional radwaste treatment systems are added to the base case plant in a series of case studies to decrease the amounts of radioactive materials released and to reduce the radiological dose commitment to the population in the surrounding area. The cost for the added waste treatment operations and the corresponding dose commitments are calculated for each case. In the final analysis, radiological dose is plotted vs the annual cost for treatment of the radwastes. The status of the radwaste treatment methods used in the case studies is discussed. Much of the technology used in the advanced cases is in an early stage of development and is not suitable for immediate use. The methodology used in estimating the costs, and the radiological doses, detailed calculations, and tabulations are presented in Appendix A and ORNL-4992. This report is a revision of the original study (ORNL/TM-4901).« less