Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

2-D or not 2-D, that is the question: A Northern California test

Conference ·
Reliable estimates of the seismic source spectrum are necessary for accurate magnitude, yield, and energy estimation. In particular, how seismic radiated energy scales with increasing earthquake size has been the focus of recent debate within the community and has direct implications on earthquake source physics studies as well as hazard mitigation. The 1-D coda methodology of Mayeda et al. has provided the lowest variance estimate of the source spectrum when compared against traditional approaches that use direct S-waves, thus making it ideal for networks that have sparse station distribution. The 1-D coda methodology has been mostly confined to regions of approximately uniform complexity. For larger, more geophysically complicated regions, 2-D path corrections may be required. The complicated tectonics of the northern California region coupled with high quality broadband seismic data provides for an ideal ''apples-to-apples'' test of 1-D and 2-D path assumptions on direct waves and their coda. Using the same station and event distribution, we compared 1-D and 2-D path corrections and observed the following results: (1) 1-D coda results reduced the amplitude variance relative to direct S-waves by roughly a factor of 8 (800%); (2) Applying a 2-D correction to the coda resulted in up to 40% variance reduction from the 1-D coda results; (3) 2-D direct S-wave results, though better than 1-D direct waves, were significantly worse than the 1-D coda. We found that coda-based moment-rate source spectra derived from the 2-D approach were essentially identical to those from the 1-D approach for frequencies less than {approx}0.7-Hz, however for the high frequencies (0.7{le} f {le} 8.0-Hz), the 2-D approach resulted in inter-station scatter that was generally 10-30% smaller. For complex regions where data are plentiful, a 2-D approach can significantly improve upon the simple 1-D assumption. In regions where only 1-D coda correction is available it is still preferable over 2-D direct wave-based measures.
Research Organization:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
DOE Contract Number:
W-7405-ENG-48
OSTI ID:
917506
Report Number(s):
UCRL-CONF-212738
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (11)

A Numerical Investigation of Lg Geometrical Spreading journal December 2002
Moment, energy, stress drop, and source spectra of western United States earthquakes from regional coda envelopes journal May 1996
Strong Lg wave attenuation in the Northern and Eastern Tibetan Plateau measured by a two-station/two-event stacking method: STRONG WAVE ATTENUATION IN TIBETAN PLATEAU MEASURED journal May 2003
Path correction using interpolated amplitude residuals: An example from central China journal July 1998
An application of the coda methodology for moment-rate spectra using broadband stations in Turkey: AN APPLICATION OF THE CODA METHODOLOGY journal June 2004
Stable and Transportable Regional Magnitudes Based on Coda-Derived Moment-Rate Spectra journal February 2003
Coda-derived source spectra, moment magnitudes and energy-moment scaling in the western Alps: Energy-moment scaling in the western Alps journal December 2004
Analysis of the seismic coda of local earthquakes as scattered waves journal January 1969
Evidence for non-constant energy/moment scaling from coda-derived source spectra journal January 2005
Attenuation of 1-6 s L g waves in Eurasia journal December 1994
Does apparent stress vary with earthquake size? journal September 2001

Similar Records

2-D Path Corrections for Local and Regional Coda Waves: A Test of Transportability
Conference · Wed Jul 13 00:00:00 EDT 2005 · OSTI ID:881646

Evolution of the Regional Coda Methodology
Conference · Thu Jul 15 00:00:00 EDT 2004 · OSTI ID:15014475

2-D Coda and Direct Wave Attenuation Tomography in Northern Italy
Journal Article · Wed Oct 17 00:00:00 EDT 2007 · Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America · OSTI ID:950640