Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Combined cytokinesis-block micronucleus and chromosomal aberration assay for the evaluation of radiosensitizers at low radiation doses

Journal Article · · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics

Several methods have been tried for evaluating the efficacy of hypoxic cell radiosensitizers at clinically relevant low radiation doses (1-4 Gy). The cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay is known to be useful for both the in vitro and in vivo evaluation of radiosensitizers, while the chromosomal aberration assay has been commonly used to assess the mutagenicity of various agents. In the present study, the chromosomal aberration assay and the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay were performed simultaneously to assess the radiosensitizing effect of etanidazole and KU-2285 at low radiation doses. The correlation between the two assays was also evaluated. In vitro study: EMT-6 cells were irradiated at a dose of 1-3 Gy under hypoxic conditions with or without the drugs at 1 mM. In vivo-in vitro study: EMT-6 tumor-bearing BALB/c mice received 2-4 Gy of radiation with or without administration of the drugs at 200 mg/kg. Single-cell suspensions were then obtained in both studies and were used for the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay and the chromosomal aberration assay. The micronucleus frequency in binucleate cells was evaluated in the former assay, and the frequency of chromosomal aberrations in metaphase cells was evaluated in the latter assay. In vitro study: the sensitizer enhancement ratios of etanidazole and KU-2285 were 1.73 and 2.21, respectively, in the micronucleus assay, and 1.41 and 1.79 in the chromosomal aberration assay. In vivo-in vitro study: the sensitizer enhancement ratios of etanidazole and KU-2285 were 1.18 and 1.31, respectively, in the micronucleus assay, and 1.16 and 1.42 in the chromosomal aberration assay. In both studies, a linear correlation was observed between the micronucleus frequency and the chromosomal aberration frequency. The background (i.e., the frequency at 0 Gy) of the latter assay was considerably lower than that of the former assay, especially in the in vivo study. 31 refs., 4 figs.

Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
OSTI ID:
86338
Journal Information:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Journal Name: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics Journal Issue: 5 Vol. 30; ISSN IOBPD3; ISSN 0360-3016
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

In vivo radiosensitization efficacy of KU-2285 and etanidazole at clinically relevant low radiation doses
Journal Article · Tue Nov 30 23:00:00 EST 1993 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics; (United States) · OSTI ID:6857424

KIN-804 vs. KU-2285 as a radiosensitizer for clinical use
Journal Article · Wed Jun 15 00:00:00 EDT 1994 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics; (United States) · OSTI ID:6946384

Comparison of radiosensitizing effect of KU-2285 and SR-2508 at low drug concentrations and doses
Journal Article · Wed Jun 15 00:00:00 EDT 1994 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics; (United States) · OSTI ID:7099959