Implications of Monte Carlo Statistical Errors in Criticality Safety Assessments
Most criticality safety calculations are performed using Monte Carlo techniques because of Monte Carlo's ability to handle complex three-dimensional geometries. For Monte Carlo calculations, the more histories sampled, the lower the standard deviation of the resulting estimates. The common intuition is, therefore, that the more histories, the better; as a result, analysts tend to run Monte Carlo analyses as long as possible (or at least to a minimum acceptable uncertainty). For Monte Carlo criticality safety analyses, however, the optimization situation is complicated by the fact that procedures usually require that an extra margin of safety be added because of the statistical uncertainty of the Monte Carlo calculations. This additional safety margin affects the impact of the choice of the calculational standard deviation, both on production and on safety. This paper shows that, under the assumptions of normally distributed benchmarking calculational errors and exact compliance with the upper subcritical limit (USL), the standard deviation that optimizes production is zero, but there is a non-zero value of the calculational standard deviation that minimizes the risk of inadvertently labeling a supercritical configuration as subcritical. Furthermore, this value is shown to be a simple function of the typical benchmarking step outcomes--the bias, the standard deviation of the bias, the upper subcritical limit, and the number of standard deviations added to calculated k-effectives before comparison to the USL.
- Research Organization:
- Office of Scientific and Technical Information, Oak Ridge, TN; Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant (Y-12), Oak Ridge, TN
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE - Office of Defense Programs (DP); USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP)
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC05-00OR22800
- OSTI ID:
- 859274
- Report Number(s):
- Y/DD-1191; 4300020173
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Plutonium Critical Mass Curve Comparison to Mass at Upper Subcritical Limit (USL) Using Whisper
Methodology for Determination of the Upper Safety Limit for Criticality Calculations for Criticality Safety Analyses
VADER: A Tool for Criticality Safety Validation
Technical Report
·
Tue Sep 27 00:00:00 EDT 2016
·
OSTI ID:1329543
Methodology for Determination of the Upper Safety Limit for Criticality Calculations for Criticality Safety Analyses
Technical Report
·
Sat Mar 31 23:00:00 EST 2001
·
OSTI ID:788327
VADER: A Tool for Criticality Safety Validation
Conference
·
Wed Nov 18 23:00:00 EST 2020
· Transactions of the American Nuclear Society
·
OSTI ID:1760137