Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Answering Key Fuel Cycle Questions

Conference ·
OSTI ID:839341
Given the range of fuel cycle goals and criteria, and the wide range of fuel cycle options, how can the set of options eventually be narrowed in a transparent and justifiable fashion? It is impractical to develop all options. We suggest an approach that starts by considering a range of goals for the Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative (AFCI) and then posits seven questions, such as whether Cs and Sr isotopes should be separated from spent fuel and, if so, what should be done with them. For each question, we consider which of the goals may be relevant to eventually providing answers. The AFCI program has both ''outcome'' and ''process'' goals because it must address both waste already accumulating as well as completing the fuel cycle in connection with advanced nuclear power plant concepts. The outcome objectives are waste geologic repository capacity and cost, energy security and sustainability, proliferation resistance, fuel cycle economics, and safety. The process objectives are rea diness to proceed and adaptability and robustness in the face of uncertainties.
Research Organization:
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID (US); Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM; Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL (US)
Sponsoring Organization:
US Department of Energy (US)
OSTI ID:
839341
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English