Comment on 'Nonlocality, Counterfactuals and Quantum Mechanics'
A recent proof [H. P. Stapp, Am. J. Phys. 65, 300 (1997)], formulated in the symbolic language of modal logic, claims to show that contemporary quantum theory, viewed as a set of rules that allow us to calculate statistical predictions among certain kinds of observations, cannot be imbedded in any rational framework that conforms to the principles that (1) the experimenters' choices of which experiments they will perform can be considered to be free choices, (2) outcomes of measurements are unique, and (3) the free choices just mentioned have no backward-in-time effects of any kind. This claim is similar to Bell's theorem, but much stronger, because no reality assumption alien to quantum philosophy is used. The paper being commented on [W. Unruh, Phys. Rev. A 59, 126 (1999)] argues that some such reality assumption has been ''smuggled'' in. That argument is examined here and shown, I believe, to be defective.
- Research Organization:
- Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE Director, Office of Science (US)
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC03-76SF00098
- OSTI ID:
- 773703
- Report Number(s):
- LBNL-41813; TRN: AH200106%%127
- Journal Information:
- Physical Review A. Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, Vol. 60, Issue 3; Other Information: PBD: 14 Apr 1999
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Comments on Shimony's 'An Analysis of Stapp's 'A bell-type theoremwithout hidden variables''
Searle's"Dualism Revisited"