Coupled Thermal-Chemical-Mechanical Modeling of Validation Cookoff Experiments
The cookoff of energetic materials involves the combined effects of several physical and chemical processes. These processes include heat transfer, chemical decomposition, and mechanical response. The interaction and coupling between these processes influence both the time-to-event and the violence of reaction. The prediction of the behavior of explosives during cookoff, particularly with respect to reaction violence, is a challenging task. To this end, a joint DoD/DOE program has been initiated to develop models for cookoff, and to perform experiments to validate those models. In this paper, a series of cookoff analyses are presented and compared with data from a number of experiments for the aluminized, RDX-based, Navy explosive PBXN-109. The traditional thermal-chemical analysis is used to calculate time-to-event and characterize the heat transfer and boundary conditions. A reaction mechanism based on Tarver and McGuire's work on RDX{sup 2} was adjusted to match the spherical one-dimensional time-to-explosion data. The predicted time-to-event using this reaction mechanism compares favorably with the validation tests. Coupled thermal-chemical-mechanical analysis is used to calculate the mechanical response of the confinement and the energetic material state prior to ignition. The predicted state of the material includes the temperature, stress-field, porosity, and extent of reaction. There is little experimental data for comparison to these calculations. The hoop strain in the confining steel tube gives an estimation of the radial stress in the explosive. The inferred pressure from the measured hoop strain and calculated radial stress agree qualitatively. However, validation of the mechanical response model and the chemical reaction mechanism requires more data. A post-ignition burn dynamics model was applied to calculate the confinement dynamics. The burn dynamics calculations suffer from a lack of characterization of the confinement for the flaw-dominated failure mode experienced in the tests. High-pressure burning rates are needed for more detailed post-ignition studies. Sub-models for chemistry, mechanical response and burn dynamics need to be validated against data from less complex experiments. The sub-models can then be used in integrated analysis for comparison with experimental data taken during integrated tests.
- Research Organization:
- Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States); Sandia National Lab. (SNL-CA), Livermore, CA (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- US Department of Energy (US)
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC04-94AL85000
- OSTI ID:
- 768084
- Report Number(s):
- SAND2000-2926C; TRN: AH200123%%316
- Resource Relation:
- Conference: JANNAF Propulsion Systems Hazards Subcommittee Meeting, Monterey, CA (US), 11/13/2000--11/17/2000; Other Information: PBD: 27 Nov 2000
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
ALE3D Model Predictions and Materials Characterization for the Cookoff Response of PBXN-109
Simulating thermal explosion of RDX-based explosives: Model comparison with experiment