Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Improved Recovery from Gulf of Mexico Reservoirs, Volume 4, Comparison of Methane, Nitrogen and Flue Gas for Attic Oil. February 14, 1995 - October 13, 1996. Final Report

Technical Report ·
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/755539· OSTI ID:755539
 [1];
  1. National Petroleum Technology Office
Gas injection for attic oil recovery was modeled in vertical sandpacks to compare the process performance characteristics of three gases, namely methane, nitrogen and flue gas. All of the gases tested recovered the same amount of oil over two cycles of gas injection. Nitrogen and flue gas recovered oil more rapidly than methane because a large portion of the methane slug dissolved in the oil phase and less free gas was available for oil displacement. The total gas utilization for two cycles of gas injection was somewhat better for nitrogen as compared to methane and flue gas. The lower nitrogen utilization was ascribed to the lower compressibility of nitrogen.
Research Organization:
Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA (US)
Sponsoring Organization:
US Department of Energy (US)
DOE Contract Number:
FG22-95BC14802
OSTI ID:
755539
Report Number(s):
DOE/BC/14802-8-Vol.4
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Evaluation and production of attic oil
Patent · Tue May 05 04:00:00 UTC 1981 · OSTI ID:6468643

Mobile inert gas generator for attic oil recovery
Conference · Wed Jan 01 04:00:00 UTC 1969 · Proc. 5th Ann. Natural Gas Processors Assoc. Meeting; (United States) · OSTI ID:5375340

Volume 3: Characterization of representative reservoirs -- South Marsh Island 73, B35K and B65G Reservoirs
Technical Report · Wed Jul 01 04:00:00 UTC 1998 · OSTI ID:661389