Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Best-judgment analysis of emergency core cooling system performance. [PWR]

Journal Article · · Nucl. Technol.; (United States)
OSTI ID:7306554
The requirements for an emergency core cooling system (ECCS) evaluation model that is acceptable for a pressurized water reactor licensing analysis are detailed in Appendix K to 10CFR50. The purpose of these requirements is to ensure that such an analysis will yield a conservative upper bound to the maximum cladding temperature and cladding oxidation that can result from a postulated loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA). By its nature, therefore, this model is inappropriate to indicate the actual anticipated results of a LOCA. Furthermore, a quantitative assessment of the conservatism inherent in the licensing model is unavailable. To produce realistic LOCA results, a calculation was performed at Combustion Engineering (C-E) for the reactor in its System 80/sup TM/ nuclear steam supply system, using a best-judgment ECCS evaluation model. The best-judgment model is a C-E first-generation best-estimate model that uses the basic Appendix K licensing computer programs, but in which the bounding conservatisms required by Appendix K are relaxed for selected parameters and models of primary concern in a LOCA analysis. The important differences between the best-judgment model and the Appendix K licensing model are examined.
Research Organization:
Combustion Engineering, Inc., Windsor, CT
OSTI ID:
7306554
Journal Information:
Nucl. Technol.; (United States), Journal Name: Nucl. Technol.; (United States) Vol. 34:2; ISSN NUTYB
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English