Economic impact analysis of proposed noise control regulation. Final report
Technical Report
·
OSTI ID:7120418
The report analyzes those aspects of the proposed noise regulation of October 24, 1974 (and alternative regulations) which are not part of the present OSHA noise regulation (29CFR1910.95). The proposed regulation maintains the 90 dBA level but adds provisions for audiometric testing and noise monitoring when workers are exposed to noise levels greater than 85 dBA. Though the exact magnitude of the benefits depends on the working definition of material impairment, the incremental benefit of an 85 dBA standard could protect 30 to 293 thousand workers from incurring a substantial hearing impairment. The proposed regulation(90 dBA) would cost $241 million annually ($155 million for noise monitoring, $86 million for audiometric testing). An 85 dBA regulation achieved solely by use of hearing protection would cost an additional $43 million annually; an 85 dBA regulation achieved through engineering controls would require an initial investment of $8 billion, but would eliminate the need and annual cost of audiometric testing($86 million) upon compliance. (GRA)
- Research Organization:
- Bolt, Beranek, and Newman, Inc., Cambridge, MA (USA)
- OSTI ID:
- 7120418
- Report Number(s):
- PB-258841; BBN-3246
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
H-Coal Pilot Plant: noise survey at the H-Coal Pilot Plant, E and H-14
Occupational noise exposure in the printing industry
Six-year follow up study for evaluation of the 85 dBA safe criterion for noise exposure
Technical Report
·
Fri Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 1982
·
OSTI ID:6255619
Occupational noise exposure in the printing industry
Journal Article
·
Thu Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 1987
· Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J.; (United States)
·
OSTI ID:5192868
Six-year follow up study for evaluation of the 85 dBA safe criterion for noise exposure
Journal Article
·
Tue May 01 00:00:00 EDT 1979
· Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J.; (United States)
·
OSTI ID:5685050