U. S. leans toward denatured thorium cycle
Journal Article
·
· Electr. Light Power (Boston); (United States)
OSTI ID:7084887
Denatured thorium appears to be the most promising among the nonproliferating alternatives to the plutonium cycle, which the Carter Administration is trying to cancel. Criteria for a better system include uranium utilization comparable to current light water reactors and minimal separation of fissile material into the waste stream. Comparisons with other systems conclude that thorium is preferable because it can lead to an acceptable fast breeder. The thorium cycle can be placed in energy centers for sensitive facilities and can also be introduced into ongoing light water systems. Reprocessing can be handled in the centers, where thorium can be mixed with plutonium for use in reactors within the center, while light water reactors operate on the outside. Any fuel leaving the center would be unsuitable for weapons. Later adaptation to in-center fast breeders will extend energy supplies, although a thorium breeder will be less efficient than a plutonium fast breeder. Denatured thorium is a technical answer to a complex political problem, but those in the nuclear industry see the U.S. goal of a nonproliferating fuel as futile in the light of world politics and breeder efforts in other countries. (DCK)
- OSTI ID:
- 7084887
- Journal Information:
- Electr. Light Power (Boston); (United States), Journal Name: Electr. Light Power (Boston); (United States) Vol. 55:8; ISSN ELLPA
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Denatured fuel cycles for international safeguards
Denatured thorium cycle: an overview
Interim assessment of the denatured /sup 233/U fuel cycle: feasibility and nonproliferation characteristics
Journal Article
·
Tue Oct 31 23:00:00 EST 1978
· Nucl. Technol.; (United States)
·
OSTI ID:6399609
Denatured thorium cycle: an overview
Journal Article
·
Wed Jan 31 23:00:00 EST 1979
· Nucl. Technol.; (United States)
·
OSTI ID:6222846
Interim assessment of the denatured /sup 233/U fuel cycle: feasibility and nonproliferation characteristics
Technical Report
·
Fri Nov 30 23:00:00 EST 1979
·
OSTI ID:5664449
Related Subjects
055001 -- Nuclear Fuels-- Safeguards
Inspection
& Accountability-- Technical Aspects
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS
210000 -- Nuclear Power Plants
29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY
290600* -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Nuclear Energy
98 NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT, SAFEGUARDS, AND PHYSICAL PROTECTION
ACTINIDES
ATOMIC ENERGY CONTROL
BREEDER REACTORS
ELEMENTS
ENERGY PARKS
ENERGY POLICY
ENERGY SOURCE DEVELOPMENT
FISSION PRODUCTS
FUEL CYCLE
FUEL REPROCESSING PLANTS
GLOBAL ASPECTS
GOVERNMENT POLICIES
INTERNATIONAL CONTROL
ISOTOPES
MANAGEMENT
METALS
NUCLEAR FACILITIES
NUCLEAR MATERIALS MANAGEMENT
NUCLEAR PARKS
PLUTONIUM
RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS
RADIOACTIVE WASTES
REACTORS
SECURITY
THORIUM REACTORS
TRANSURANIUM ELEMENTS
WASTES
Inspection
& Accountability-- Technical Aspects
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS
210000 -- Nuclear Power Plants
29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY
290600* -- Energy Planning & Policy-- Nuclear Energy
98 NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT, SAFEGUARDS, AND PHYSICAL PROTECTION
ACTINIDES
ATOMIC ENERGY CONTROL
BREEDER REACTORS
ELEMENTS
ENERGY PARKS
ENERGY POLICY
ENERGY SOURCE DEVELOPMENT
FISSION PRODUCTS
FUEL CYCLE
FUEL REPROCESSING PLANTS
GLOBAL ASPECTS
GOVERNMENT POLICIES
INTERNATIONAL CONTROL
ISOTOPES
MANAGEMENT
METALS
NUCLEAR FACILITIES
NUCLEAR MATERIALS MANAGEMENT
NUCLEAR PARKS
PLUTONIUM
RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS
RADIOACTIVE WASTES
REACTORS
SECURITY
THORIUM REACTORS
TRANSURANIUM ELEMENTS
WASTES