Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Population biology in the courtroom: the Hudson River controversy

Journal Article · · BioScience; (United States)
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1309420· OSTI ID:7003116
In support of more than a decade of litigation, scientists devoted unprecedented effort to modeling the impact of electric power generation on the Hudson River striped bass population. When the Cornwall pumped storage facility was first proposed, opponents of the project argued that enormous numbers of striped bass eggs and larvae would be entrained with the pumped water and killed. Several years later, when the US Atomic Energy Commission held hearings to investigate the potential environmental impacts of Indian Point Unit 2, a nuclear power plant nearing completion 25 km downriver from Cornwall, it was argued that young striped bass would be entrained through the condensers with the cooling water and killed by thermal and mechanical stress. In addition, fish would be killed by impingement on the trash screens. The AEC staff recommended that a cooling tower be built at Indian Point to reduce cooling-water requirements and, therefore, entrainment and impingement mortality. The most sophisticated models failed to provide useful long-term impact predictions. However, simpler models, used to evaluate alternatives for mitigation, were instrumental in arranging a negotiated settlement.
Research Organization:
Oak Ridge National Lab., TN
DOE Contract Number:
W-7405-ENG-26
OSTI ID:
7003116
Journal Information:
BioScience; (United States), Journal Name: BioScience; (United States) Vol. 34:1; ISSN BISNA
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English