skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Comparison of gadolinium and ZrB/sub 2/ as integral fuel burnable absorbers in PWRs

Conference · · Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc.; (United States)
OSTI ID:6883558

This study compares the use of gadolinium and zirconium diboride (ZrB/sub 2/) as integral fuel burnable absorbers (IFBAs) for controlling peaking factors and maintaining an acceptable moderator temperature coefficient (MTC) in pressurized water reactors (PWRs). The ceramic Gd/sub 2/O/sub 3/ is mixed directly with UO/sub 2/, while ZrB/sub 2/ is coated on the surface of the UO/sub 2/ pellet. Because of the lower thermal conductivity and lower melting temperature in the mixture of Gd/sub 2/O/sub 3/ + UO/sub 2/ a reduced uranium enrichment in the gadolinium bearing rods is required. In the ZrB/sub 2/ application, the depletion produces additional helium gas; therefore, the initial back-filled gas pressure has to be reduced. The use of either absorber results in a more complete burnout relative to lumped burnable absorbers, thereby yielding improved uranium utilization. ZrB/sub 2/ is favored over gadolinium as the integral fuel burnable absorber for PWRs because of improved power peaking control, reduced residual activity, and its unchanged uranium enrichment requirement. These factors lead to longer cycle lengths and greater fuel management flexibility in PWRs. The use of ZrB/sub 2/ IFBAs provides a more economical and flexible burnable absorber than gadolinium for PWR applications.

OSTI ID:
6883558
Report Number(s):
CONF-8711195-; TRN: 88-028671
Journal Information:
Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc.; (United States), Vol. 55; Conference: American Nuclear Society winter meeting, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 15 Nov 1987
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English