Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Effects of sorbent attrition on utilization

Technical Report ·
OSTI ID:6878784

Attrition of surface product levers of sulfite/sulfate may be the key to substantially increasing sorbent utilization in new dry scrubbing processes. This conclusion has been reached from research results obtained from new gas/solid contacting methods such as the Circulating Fluidized Bed Absorber and the Limestone Emission Control method. An additional savings may be reduced by the use of large initial sorbent, particle sizes which greatly reduces the cost of grinding and sorbent preparation. The objectives of project 1.7 were then to study attrition of sorbent particles in a systematic fashion in order to determine how to use attrition to increase sorbent utilization. This was to be carried out by the construction of a bench scale fluidized bed where a series of experiments were to be conducted to measure attrition of lime and limestone samples. This has been accomplished and the project proceeded as anticipated. The results indicate that attrition differs for wet and dry conditions for certain sorbents and that these differences are substantial. Under dry conditions, the results of attrition tests on carefully characterized lime samples indicate that mechanical abrasion is the primary attrition mechanism. The rate of attrition is seen to be similar to a first order chemical reaction where the bed mass (or total surface area) is analagous to reactant concentration. A model for mechanical attrition is presented which expresses the rate constant in an Arrhenius type form proportional to a pseudo attrition activation energy and excess gas energy above a minimum level. The value of this pseudo attrition activation energy for lime has been found to be 106 KJ/KG. For the attrition of wetted lime particles in a fluidized bed. the attrition rate has been found to be directly related to the volumetric flow rate of injected water.

Research Organization:
Ohio Coal Development Office, Columbus, OH (United States); Cincinnati Univ., OH (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
STOFOH; Ohio State Government, Columbus, OH (United States)
OSTI ID:
6878784
Report Number(s):
OCDO-93004574; ON: TI93004574; CNN: CDO/R-87-2C/B
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English