Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and radionuclide imaging in the evaluation of renal transplant failure

Journal Article · · Clin. Nucl. Med.; (United States)

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was compared with radionuclide scintigraphy (RNS) in 16 patients with renal transplants undergoing renal failure to determine which modality could best discriminate between rejection, acute tubular necrosis (ATN), and cyclosporin nephrotoxicity (CN). Although all rejecting transplants had reduced corticomedullary differentiation (CMD) on T1-weighted MR images, four of five cases of ATN had appearances that could not be distinguished from rejection. A normal CMD suggests nonrejection, but diminished CMD is nonspecific. Tc-99m DTPA/I-131 hippuran RNS was superior to MRI in differentiating rejection from ATN. Although ATN and CN have similar RNS patterns, this distinction can usually be made based on the clinical time course. Other potential uses of MRI in the evaluation of the renal transplants are discussed.

Research Organization:
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (USA)
OSTI ID:
6858941
Journal Information:
Clin. Nucl. Med.; (United States), Journal Name: Clin. Nucl. Med.; (United States) Vol. 13:4; ISSN CNMED
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English