Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Comparison of advanced nuclear and chemical propulsion

Conference ·
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1988-2927· OSTI ID:6845818

The country is developing a new heavy launch cargo vehicle. A complete low cost space transportation system will require new propulsion modules for moving payloads from low earth orbit to their final destination. Three propulsion concepts, a direct thrust nuclear stage, a nuclear electric stage, and a direct thrust chemical stage, have been compared for performing earth orbital transfer operations. The nuclear stages have the potential to be the most cost effective because of their lower propellant consumption. The direct thrust nuclear stage appears to be the most cost effective because of its high thrust compared to the nuclear-electric stage, its high specific impulse compared to the chemical stage, and its operational flexibility. Public acceptance of nuclear propulsion in space will require a more disciplined approach to design to ensure that reliability and safety are an integral part of the basic design. Operational concepts for nuclear systems are also important to safe operation and these should be studied early. A design process initiated in the design of the NERVA prototype flight engine is recommended as a starting point for implementing a rigorous design process. 7 refs., 3 figs., 5 tabs.

Research Organization:
EG and G Idaho, Inc., Idaho Falls, ID (USA)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
DOE Contract Number:
AC07-76ID01570
OSTI ID:
6845818
Report Number(s):
EGG-M-88279; CONF-880764-3; AIAA-88-2927; ON: TI88015225
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English