Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Location theoretic analysis of competition in electrical generation

Thesis/Dissertation ·
OSTI ID:6796273
Advocates of deregulation of electricity generation believe that it would spur efficiency and aid the industry's finances, but scale economies and transmission costs would cause deregulated power markets to be oligopolistic. Location theoretic modes, which account for the effect of location upon firm behavior, are developed to calculate the likely range of deregulated prices. THe lower bound occurs when firms believe that rivals will hold rates fixed. Limit pricing, the assumed upper bound, is where prices are set to prevent entry. Continuous location models are applied. They assume uniformity over space of demand functions, firm location, and production costs. Equilibrium prices are calculated for both the short and long run for a bulk power market in upstate New York. In the short run, deregulation raises prices by 48% to 68%, on average. This is because average costs, the basis of regulated prices, are less than either the expense of running oil fired plants or the cost to entrants of a new coal unit. On average, the oligopolistic firms raise price over mariginal cost by between 1% and 15%. In the long run, marginal and average costs are equal, and deregulated prices are within 5% of regulated levels. Network location theoretic models, solved by linear programming, are also used to project deregulated prices. They explicitly incorporate spatial variations in demand functions, generation and transmission costs, and plant ownership. The resulting short run prices, when averaged across the region, closely resemble the planar model results. Results for the year 2000 are similar: deregulated rates, just above marginal cost, are greater than regulated prices for most consumers.
OSTI ID:
6796273
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English