Pitfalls and considerations in obtaining state commission approval for injection projects
Conference
·
· AAPG Bulletin (American Association of Petroleum Geologists); (United States)
OSTI ID:6681577
- VanCott, Bagley, Cornwall McCarthy, Salt Lake City, UT (United States)
Attractive economics and technological advances have helped stimulate interest in enhanced-recovery projects. In most Rocky Mountain states, underground fluid-injection projects must be approved by an oil and gas commission or board in accordance with statutes or administrative regulations. Frequently, petroleum geologists and reservoir engineers present the factual basis supporting the injection project by testifying as expert witnesses during administrative proceedings. Many injection projects are operated by independents who may have limited experience in preparing for such hearings. Obtaining proper jurisdiction and establishing an adequate factual record is critical. Failure to do so may preclude obtaining approval from the commission or subject such approval to attack on appeal. Faulty legal compliance may jeopardize such projects. Accordingly, legal counsel should be consulted during the preparation of the application, testimony, and exhibits. Formal rules often are replaced during administrative proceedings and improper objections to projects are relatively common. Whereas some objections may be raised by competitors, many improper objections to projects are raised by surface landowners who attempt to use their objections as a negotiating tactic to obtain favorable surface-access agreements from operators. Although oil and gas commissions typically lack legal authority to resolve surface-access disputes, nevertheless, in the interest of furthering the appearance of fairness, they commonly permit surface landowners to state their objections during hearings. Operators should be prepared to protect their interests on the record and not allow such objections to sidetrack their efforts to obtain approval of their injection projects.
- OSTI ID:
- 6681577
- Report Number(s):
- CONF-930947--
- Conference Information:
- Journal Name: AAPG Bulletin (American Association of Petroleum Geologists); (United States) Journal Volume: 77:8
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Sunset panel votes on changes to the PUC and OPUC
Policy issues raised by intervenor requests for financial assistance in NRC proceedings
Inconstant lady: discovery in administrative adjudications and the evidentiary use of its fruits
Journal Article
·
· Texas Energy Reporter; (United States)
·
OSTI ID:6533656
Policy issues raised by intervenor requests for financial assistance in NRC proceedings
Technical Report
·
Fri Jul 18 00:00:00 EDT 1975
·
OSTI ID:7341467
Inconstant lady: discovery in administrative adjudications and the evidentiary use of its fruits
Journal Article
·
Fri Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 1982
· Energy Law J.; (United States)
·
OSTI ID:6466484
Related Subjects
02 PETROLEUM
020300* -- Petroleum-- Drilling & Production
020700 -- Petroleum-- Economics
Industrial
& Business Aspects
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES
ENERGY SOURCES
ENHANCED RECOVERY
FLUID INJECTION
FOSSIL FUELS
FUELS
INJECTION WELLS
LICENSES
LICENSING PROCEDURES
OPERATING LICENSES
PETROLEUM
WELLS
020300* -- Petroleum-- Drilling & Production
020700 -- Petroleum-- Economics
Industrial
& Business Aspects
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES
ENERGY SOURCES
ENHANCED RECOVERY
FLUID INJECTION
FOSSIL FUELS
FUELS
INJECTION WELLS
LICENSES
LICENSING PROCEDURES
OPERATING LICENSES
PETROLEUM
WELLS