Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Performance and economics of eight alternative systems for residential heating, cooling, and water heating in 115 US cities

Technical Report ·
OSTI ID:6670951
This study updates the results of a previous report, ORNL/CON-52, to take into account the effects of 1981 costs and technology on the performance and economics of five electrically driven heating, ventilating, air-conditioning, and water-heating systems for residences. In addition, the present study extends the analysis to include three fossil-fuel-fired systems. Current life-cycle costs and annual efficiencies are presented for 115 cities in the United States for each of the following residential systems: (1) an electric furnace, central air conditioner, and electric resistance water heater; (2) a high-performance air-to-air heat pump with electric resistance water heater; (3) a high-performance air-to-air heat pump with desuperheater water heater; (4) a minimum annual cycle energy system (ACES) of the brine-chiller type; (5) a full ACES of the brine-chiller type; (6) an advanced gas furnace, central air conditioner, and gas water heater; (7) an oil furnace, central air conditioner, and electric resistance water heater; and (8) a pulse gas furnace, central air conditioner, and gas water heater. Of the electrically driven systems, the full ACES is found to exhibit the highest annual efficiency and the highest life-cycle costs for most regions of the nation. The gas furnace system generally exhibits lower life-cycle costs than any of the other residential heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning systems and yields reasonably good annual efficiency.
Research Organization:
Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (USA)
DOE Contract Number:
W-7405-ENG-26
OSTI ID:
6670951
Report Number(s):
ORNL/CON-89; ON: DE83003196
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English