Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Inconsistencies and open questions regarding low-dose health effects of ionizing radiation

Journal Article · · Environmental Health Perspectives; (United States)
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.94102656· OSTI ID:6647206
 [1];  [2]
  1. Portland State Univ., OR (United States)
  2. Universitaet Muenster (Germany)

The state of knowledge of health effects from low-dose exposures to ionizing radiation has recently been reviewed in extensive reports by three prestigious national and international commissions of scientific and medical experts with partially overlapping membership, known by their acronyms UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation), BEIR V (Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation), and ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection). Publication of these reports was followed by a number of summaries in scientific journals, authored by recognized radiation experts, that purport to present a scientific consensus of low-dose effects in a more accessible format for health professionals. A critical comparison between various presentations of accepted views, however, reveals inconsistencies regarding [open quotes]established[close quotes] facts and unsettled questions.

OSTI ID:
6647206
Journal Information:
Environmental Health Perspectives; (United States), Journal Name: Environmental Health Perspectives; (United States) Vol. 102:8; ISSN 0091-6765; ISSN EVHPAZ
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English