Flow conditioner location effects in orifice flowmeters. Technical note
Technical Report
·
OSTI ID:6618318
Tests sponsored by Gas Research Institute were conducted with orifice flowmeters of two nominal sizes: 104 mm (4 in) and 52 mm (2 in). For the 104 mm orifice meter the authors compared discharge coefficients measured in two common piping configurations used by laboratories to establish baseline flow conditions. The discharge coefficients are similar for beta ratios of 0.43, 0.55, and 0.67, but not for the 0.73 beta ratio plate. For other tests with the orifice meter, a 90 degree elbow or a reducer was located upstream of the orifice plate and flow conditioner. Two beta ratios (0.54, 0.67) were tested in the 52 mm orifice meter in baseline configuration and with an elbow at 17D and a flow conditioner at 12D. For many of the tests, differential pressures were measured at more than one flange tap location. Placing the flow conditioner too close to the orifice plate in either meter yields discharge coefficients below baseline values. The location of the flow conditioner with respect to the orifice plate appears to influence meter performance more significantly than the type or location of flow disturbance upstream of it.
- Research Organization:
- National Inst. of Standards and Technology (CSTL), Boulder, CO (United States). Chemical Engineering Div.
- OSTI ID:
- 6618318
- Report Number(s):
- PB-93-159457/XAB; NIST/TN--1356
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Flow conditioner tests for three orifice flowmeter sizes. Technical note
Orifice meter installation effects in the GRI MRF
Installation effects on the V-Cone flowmeter
Technical Report
·
Sun May 01 00:00:00 EDT 1994
·
OSTI ID:6780789
Orifice meter installation effects in the GRI MRF
Conference
·
Sat Dec 30 23:00:00 EST 1995
·
OSTI ID:443583
Installation effects on the V-Cone flowmeter
Conference
·
Sat Dec 30 23:00:00 EST 1995
·
OSTI ID:443562