Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Chromate versus non-chrome treatment of refinery cooling tower effluents

Conference · · Natl. Pet. Refiners Assoc. Annu. Meet. Pap.; (United States)
OSTI ID:6568948
Zinc chromate treatment of cooling water circulating at 2700 gpm at Placid Refining Co.'s 36,000 bbl/day refinery was replaced by treatment with 150 ppm of Drew Chemical Corp.'s organic corrosion inhibitor Drewgard 187 because of current expansion projects involving a 20,000 bbl/day vacuum unit, a 40,000 gpm cooling water demand, and a maximum allowable chromate discharge of 1.6 lb/day. Calcium hypochlorite was replaced by gaseous chlorination for microbiological control. Corrosion rates for mild steel under the Drewgard 187 treatment have been 2-4 mils/yr. An attempt to treat the cooling water with an inorganic polyphosphate produced considerable fouling due to the local makeup water quality. A comparison of traditional zinc-chromate technology combined with various chromium removal systems showed that the Drewgard program was more economical.
OSTI ID:
6568948
Report Number(s):
CONF-7903175-
Conference Information:
Journal Name: Natl. Pet. Refiners Assoc. Annu. Meet. Pap.; (United States) Journal Volume: AM-79-40
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English