OSHA's approach to risk assessment for setting a revised occupational exposure standard for 1,3-butadiene
Journal Article
·
· Environmental Health Perspectives; (USA)
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Washington, DC (USA)
In its 1980 benzene decision (Industrial Union Department, ALF-CIO v. American Petroleum Institute, 448 U.S. 607 (1980)), the Supreme Court ruled that before he can promulgate any permanent health or safety standard, the Secretary (of Labor) is required to make a threshold finding that a place of employment is unsafe--in the sense that significant risks are present and can be lessened by a change in practices (448 U.S. at 642). The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has interpreted this to mean that whenever possible, it must quantify the risk associated with occupational exposure to a toxic substance at the current permissible exposure limit (PEL). If OSHA determines that there is significant risk to workers' health at its current standard, then it must quantify the risk associated with a variety of alternative standards to determine at what level, if any, occupational exposure to a substance no longer poses a significant risk. For rulemaking on occupational exposure to 1,3-butadiene, there are two studies that are suitable for quantitative risk assessment. One is a mouse inhalation bioassay conducted by the National Toxicology Program (NTP), and the other is a rat inhalation bioassay conducted by Hazelton Laboratories Europe. Of the four risk assessments that have been submitted to OSHA, all four have used the mouse and/or rat data with a variety of models to quantify the risk associated with occupational exposure to 1,3-butadiene. In addition, OSHA has performed its own risk assessment using the female mouse and female rat data and the one-hit and multistage models.
- OSTI ID:
- 6508111
- Journal Information:
- Environmental Health Perspectives; (USA), Journal Name: Environmental Health Perspectives; (USA) Vol. 86; ISSN 0091-6765; ISSN EVHPA
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Court decision dropping toxic substance rules stands
Implications of OSHA's reliance on TLVs in developing the air contaminants standard
OSHA's permissible exposure limits: Regulatory compliance versus health risk
Journal Article
·
Tue Jun 01 00:00:00 EDT 1993
· Pollution Engineering; (United States)
·
OSTI ID:6408969
Implications of OSHA's reliance on TLVs in developing the air contaminants standard
Journal Article
·
Mon Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 1990
· American Journal of Industrial Medicine; (USA)
·
OSTI ID:5897726
OSHA's permissible exposure limits: Regulatory compliance versus health risk
Journal Article
·
Thu Nov 30 23:00:00 EST 1989
· Risk Analysis; (USA)
·
OSTI ID:7169609
Related Subjects
560300* -- Chemicals Metabolism & Toxicology
63 RADIATION, THERMAL, AND OTHER ENVIRON. POLLUTANT EFFECTS ON LIVING ORGS. AND BIOL. MAT.
AIR POLLUTION
ANIMALS
BIOASSAY
BUTADIENE
CARCINOGENESIS
DIENES
HYDROCARBONS
MAMMALS
MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE EXPOSURE
MICE
NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
PATHOGENESIS
POLLUTION
POLYENES
RATS
RISK ASSESSMENT
RODENTS
SAFETY STANDARDS
STANDARDS
US DOL
US ORGANIZATIONS
US OSHA
VERTEBRATES
63 RADIATION, THERMAL, AND OTHER ENVIRON. POLLUTANT EFFECTS ON LIVING ORGS. AND BIOL. MAT.
AIR POLLUTION
ANIMALS
BIOASSAY
BUTADIENE
CARCINOGENESIS
DIENES
HYDROCARBONS
MAMMALS
MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE EXPOSURE
MICE
NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
PATHOGENESIS
POLLUTION
POLYENES
RATS
RISK ASSESSMENT
RODENTS
SAFETY STANDARDS
STANDARDS
US DOL
US ORGANIZATIONS
US OSHA
VERTEBRATES