Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Hydrogasification gas processing studies

Technical Report ·
OSTI ID:6461555
Three methods of separating hydrogen from methane and carbon monoxide were evaluated: use of a moving bed of activated carbon (hypersorption), use of cryogenics, and use of an ''absorbing oil'' to absorb the methane. The feed gas stream studied was the make-gas from a hydrogasifier. This separation was necessary to permit: (a) recycle of the hydrogen to the hydrogasifier, and (b) production of a pipeline gas quality methane stream that would meet the low carbon monoxide specification for pipeline gas. Hypersorption (moving bed of activated carbon) was the method of gas separation chosen. Its advantages are competitive economics and recovery of each of the components with nil quantities of the others at nearly system pressure. This makes is possible to eliminate methanation facilities, thereby simplifying the process. The opportunity for simplification of the process was made possible by the higher conversion gained in the single-stage flash hydropyrolysis unit compared to the first stage of the Hydrane process. By holding the total conversion during the flash hydropyrolysis at about 46%, a ''balance'' is struck between the conversion of coal to hydrocarbons and the production of sufficient char to make the needed hydrogen for the hydrogasifier. Processing of the gas from the hydrogasifier into a product gas stream containing less than 0.1% CO and a recycle hydrogen stream results in the desired simplification by eliminating the need for methanation of the product gas stream.
Research Organization:
Dravo Corp., Pittsburgh, PA (USA)
OSTI ID:
6461555
Report Number(s):
METC/CR-78/19
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English