Analyzing the reprocessing decision: plutonium recycle and nuclear proliferation. Final report
The United States decision to defer indefinitely the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel is examined in this thesis. Bayesian decision analysis is applied to develop a rational framework for the assessment of alternatives. Benefits and costs for each alternative are evaluated and compared in dollar terms to determine the optimal decision. A fuel cycle simulation model is constructed to assess the economic value of reprocessing light water reactor (LWR) spent fuel and recycling plutonium. In addition, a dynamic fuel substitution model is used to estimate the economic effects of the reprocessing decision's influence on the introduction date of the liquid metal fast breeder reactor (LMFBR). The analysis of benefits and costs is extended to include the social costs due to technological risks, such as accident risk, nuclear theft and/or sabotage, and international nuclear proliferation. These social costs are expressed in dollar terms for comparison with the conventional economic values. Results of the analysis indicate that the domestic social costs are less than the economic benefits by more than three orders of magnitude, and that the permit option dominates those of delay or prohibit. An examination of proliferation risk indicates a factor of approximately 7 between cost-benefits. Thus, on the basis of this analysis, it appears that to permit reprocessing is optimal over delaying or prohibiting the technology.
- Research Organization:
- Stanford Univ., CA (USA). Dept. of Mechanical Engineering
- OSTI ID:
- 6431427
- Report Number(s):
- EPRI-NP-931; TRN: 79-004059
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Light water reactor fuel reprocessing and recycling
Radioactive Waste Management - It's Role in contributing and achieving Sustainability. R1.13 The French strategy of waste management: technical and political dimensions of sustainability
Related Subjects
POLICY AND ECONOMY
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS
98 NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT, SAFEGUARDS, AND PHYSICAL PROTECTION
PLUTONIUM RECYCLE
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS
RISK ASSESSMENT
DECISION MAKING
ECONOMICS
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
HEALTH HAZARDS
PROLIFERATION
REPROCESSING
SABOTAGE
SAFETY
SOCIAL IMPACT
THEFT
FUEL CYCLE
HAZARDS
SEPARATION PROCESSES
290600* - Energy Planning & Policy- Nuclear Energy
050800 - Nuclear Fuels- Spent Fuels Reprocessing
055001 - Nuclear Fuels- Safeguards
Inspection
& Accountability- Technical Aspects