Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Comparison of three aerosol sampling techniques and the differences in the nitrate determined by each

Conference ·
OSTI ID:6334515
Ambient aerosol samples were collected simultaneously with three different methods, one a size fractionated impactor sampler and two filter samplers. Infrared spectroscopy was used to analyze the collected aerosol using attenuated total internal reflection for the impactor samples and direct transmission through ultra-thin teflon membrane filters for the filter samples. All samples were analyzed as soon as possible after collection; some were reanalyzed after being stored in closed petri dishes for up to 10 days. A major purpose of the study was to evaluate the neutralization of acidic sulfate aerosols after sample collection by the filtration techniques. No acidic sulfate was found in any of the samples collected during the field study. However, significant differences were observed in the nitrate content of the samples collected by the different samplers. Also, in several samples collected with the ATR impactor the nitrate content decreased upon storage. In some cases the nitrate absorbance bands diminished to zero; in other cases the nitrate initially decreased and then remained stable; in yet another case, a high level of nitrate persisted over several days. The results indicate that two different types of nitrate compounds were present in the samples, one more ''volatile'' than the other, although the infrared spectra were consistent with both of them being ammonium nitrate.
Research Organization:
Argonne National Lab., IL (USA)
DOE Contract Number:
W-31109-ENG-38
OSTI ID:
6334515
Report Number(s):
CONF-8705149-1; ON: DE87011456
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English